Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m42fx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-22T17:08:05.271Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hydrochemical associations and depth profiles of arsenic and fluoride in Quaternary loess aquifers of northern Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

C. Warren ,
W. G. Burgess  and
M. G. Garcia
C. Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK Department of Earth Sciences, Oxford University, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PR, UK
W. G. Burgess*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
M. G. Garcia
Affiliation:
Centro de Investigaciones y Transferencia en Quimica Aplicada, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán, Tucumán 4000, Argentina
*
*E-mail: william.burgess@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Arsenic and fluoride in groundwater from Quaternary loess deposits in Argentina pose major health concerns. Common sources for arsenic and fluoride have been suggested but the processes of mobilization are disputed, and distributions in groundwater are largely unresolved at a sample density >1/50 km2. At Los Pereyras in Tucumán Province, northern Argentina, we have evaluated distributions and hydrochemical associations of arsenic and fluoride with a sample density of 0.75 per km2 over an area of 75 km2, to a depth of 230 m. Groundwater in the loess is oxic and alkaline. Fluoride is restricted to the upper 20 m of the Quaternary loess, where it reaches 8.3 mg/1. Arsenic has a vertical layering consistent with that of fluoride, ranging from 20 to 760 μg/1 in the upper 20 m and 58—163 μg/l below this. There are two sources of arsenic, one unrelated to the fluoride source. Positive correlations between arsenic and fluoride with pH, but not with alkalinity, support desorption from iron oxyhydroxides as the likely mechanism of release to groundwater for arsenic and fluoride, rather than the weathering of silicate minerals. Stratigraphic and/or palaeohydrological controls may explain the observed depth distributions within the loess aquifer.

Keywords

arsenicfluorideloessaquiferArgentinagroundwater
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 69 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 877 - 886
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Amenico, M. (2000) Identificaión de una capa de ceniza volcdnica somera y su implicancia en el contenido del oligoelemento arsenico en el aquifero libre, Departamento Robles, Santiago del Estero, Argentina (The identification of a layer of volcanic ash and its implication for the concentration of arsenic in the phreatic aquifer of Robles Department, Santiago del Estero, Argentina). Unpublished Report.Google Scholar
Appelo, C.A.J., van der Weiden, M.J.J., Tournassat, C. and Charlet, L. (2002) Surface complexation of ferrous iron and carbonate on ferrihydrite and the mobilization of arsenic. Environmental Science and Technology, 36, 3096–3103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bonaparte, J.F. and Bobovniqov, J. (1974) Algunos fósiles pleistocenos de la provincia de Tucumán y su significado bioestratigráfico. (Various Pleistocene fossils from Tucuman Province and their biostratigraphical significance). Acta Geologica Lilloana 12, 171–183.Google Scholar
Burgess, W.G., Burren, M., Perrin, J. and Ahmed, K.M. (2002) Constraints on sustainable development of arsenic-bearing aquifers in southern Bangladesh. Part 1: A conceptual model of arsenic in the aquifer. Pp. 145 — 163 in: Sustainable Groundwater Development (Hiscock, K.M., Rivett, M.O. and Davison, R.M., editors). Special Publications, 193. Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Cuthbert, M.O., Burgess, W.G. and Connell, L. (2002) Constraints on sustainable development of arsenic-bearing aquifers in southern Bangladesh. Part 2: Preliminary models of arsenic variability in pumped groundwater. Pp. 165 — 179 in: Sustainable Groundwater Development (Hiscock, K.M., Rivett, M.O. and Davison, R.M., editors). Special Publication, 193. Geological Society, London.Google Scholar
Dzombak, D.A. and Morel, F.M.M. (1990) Surface Complexation Modeling: Hydrous Ferric Oxide. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 393 pp.Google Scholar
Freeze, R.A. and Cherry, J.A. (1979) Groundwater. Prentice-Hall Inc., New Jersey, 604 pp.Google Scholar
García, M.G., Fernández, D.S., Hidalgo, M. del, V. and Blesa, M.A. (2000) Arsenic in groundwaters of the southeast of Tucuman Province, Argentina. Pp. 503–508 in: Groundwater: Past Achievements and Future Challenges (Sililo, O., editor). Proceedings of the 30th Congress of the International Association of Hydrogeologists, Cape Town, South Africa, Balkema, Rotterdam,.Google Scholar
Gonzalez, O.E. (1998) Hoja Geológica (Geological Map) 2766-11, San Miguel de Tucumán. Programa Nacional de Cartas Geológicas de la Republica Argentina. 1:250,000.Google Scholar
Kinniburgh, D.G. and Smedley, P.L. (editors) (2001) Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh (four volumes). British Geological Survey, Keyworth, Nottingham, UK.Google Scholar
Kruse, E.E. and Ainchil, J.E. (2000) Assessment of fluoride concentration in groundwater, Saldungaray, Argentina. Pp. 545–548 in: Groundwater: Past Achievements and Future Challenges (Sililo, O., editor). Proceedings of the 30th Congress of the International Association of Hydrogeologists, Cape Town, South Africa, Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Niccoli, H.B., Suriano, J.M., Gomez Peral, M.A., Ferpozzi, L.H. and Baleani, O.A. (1989) Groundwater contamination with arsenic and other trace elements in an area of the Pampa, Province of Córdoba, Argentina. Environmental Geology and Water Science, 14, 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sardi, F.G. and Aceñoloza, G.G. (1998) The Geology of Tucuman: an overview. Pp. 287–288 in: Geologia de Tucumón. Colegio de Graduados en Ciencias Geologicas de Tucumón, Argentina.Google Scholar
Sayago, J.M. (1995) The Argentine neotropical loess: an overview. Quaternary Science Reviews, 14, 755–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smedley, P.L., Nicolli, H.B., Barros, A.J. and Tullio, J.O. (1998) Origin and mobility of arsenic in groundwater from the Pampean Plain, Argentina. Pp. 275–278 in: Water Rock Interaction (Arehart, G.B. and Hulston, J.R., editors). Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Smedley, P.L., Nicolli, H.B., Macdonald, D.M.J., Barros, A.J. and Tullio, J.O. (2002) Hydrogeochemistry of arsenic and other inorganic constituents in groundwaters from La Pampa, Argentina. Applied Geochemistry 17, 259—284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smedley, P.L., Kinniburgh, D.G., Macdonald, D.M.J., Nicolli, H.B., Barros, A.J., Tullio, J.O., Pearce, J.M. and Alonso, M.S. (2005) Arsenic associations in sediments from the loess aquifer of La Pampa, Argentina. Applied Geochemistry 20, 989—1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, C. (2001) Hydrogeology and groundwater quality of Los Pereyras, Tucumñn, Argentina. MSc thesis, University College London (unpublished).Google Scholar
Welch, A.H., Westjohn, D.B., Helsel, D.R. and Wanty, R.B. (2000) Arsenic in groundwater in the United States: occurrence and geochemistry. Ground Water, 38, 589–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar