Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T05:27:35.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of potassium feldspar polymorphs in intrusive sequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Ian Parsons  and
Rognvald Boyd
Ian Parsons
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Marischal College, Aberdeen, AB9 1AS, Scotland
Rognvald Boyd
Affiliation:
Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Marischal College, Aberdeen, AB9 1AS, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

K-feldspar variation is described for four salic plutonic igneous complexes that show normative mineral variation in keeping with the course of fractionation predicted from experimental studies. These are a sodic syenite (Loch Ailsh), potassic syenites (Loch Loyal), a peralkaline syenite and soda granite complex (Puklen), and a calc-alkaline pluton (Foyers). Additional data are given for examples from the literature. Microcline becomes more abundant relative to orthoclase as members of these intrusive sequences approach thermal minima on the liquidus in the system Ab-Or-An-Qz. This relation exists irrespective of the compositional range of the rock suites, the bulk composition of the alkali feldspars, grain size, or field relations. Early orthoclase-bearing rocks retain orthoclase when enclosed as xenoliths in microcline-bearing rocks, or when cut by minor bodies of microcline-bearing rocks. The K-feldspar variation may reflect increasing water content or the peralkaline or peraluminous character of the fractionating magmas. These factors affect the feldspar structure at the time of initial crystal growth and dictate whether microcline will develop on cooling.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 38 , Issue 295 , September 1971 , pp. 295 - 311
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, (D.K.) and Schairer, (J.F.), 1966. Journ. Petrology. 7, 114 [M.A. 18-21 l.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, (T. F. W.), 1959 [M.A. 14--504].Google Scholar
Barth, (T. F. W.), 1969. Feldspars. New York (Wiley-Interscience).Google Scholar
Bordet, (P.) and Chauris, (L.), 1965. Bull. Soc. franç Min. Crist. 85, 527 [M.A. 17-508].Google Scholar
CAILLIÈRE, (S.) and Kraut, (F.), 1960. Ibid. 83, 21 [M.A. 15-49].Google Scholar
Carmichael, (I. S. E.), 1963. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 119, 95 [M.A. 16-579].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, (O. H. J.), 1962. Norsk Geol. Tidsskr. 42, 2, Feldspar vol. 383 [M.A. 16-464].Google Scholar
Dietrich, (R.V.), 1962. Ibid. 394 [M.A. 16-462].Google Scholar
Emeleus, (C.H.) and Smith, (J.V.), 1959. Amer. Min. 44, 1187 [M.A. 15-140].Google Scholar
Euler, (R.) and Hellner, (E.), 1961. Zeits. Krist. 115, 433 IM.A. 15-440].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, (R.B.), 1960. Canad. Min. 6, 415 [M.A. 15-140].Google Scholar
King, (B.C.), 1942. Quart. Journ. Geol Soc. 98, 147 [M.A. 9-165].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laves, (F.), 1950. Journ. Geol. 58, 548 [M.A. 11-327].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, (W.S.), 1957. Amer. Journ. Sci. 255, 481 [M.A. 14--38].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, (W.S.), and Smith, (J.V.), 1961. Estudios Geolegicos, Cursillos y Conferencias. 8, 53 [M.A. 16-75].Google Scholar
Marmo, (V.), 1959. Bull. Comm. Gdol. Finlande. 29, 133 [M.A. 14-416].Google Scholar
Marston, (R.J.), 1967. Nature, 214, 159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marston, (R.J.), 1970. Quart. Journ. Geol. Soc. 126, 33 I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, (R.F.), 1969. Contr. Min. Petr. 23, 323 .CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nilssen, (B.) and Smithson, (S.B.), 1965. Norsk. Geol. Tidsskr. 45, 367 [M.A. 17-610].Google Scholar
Parsons, (I.), 1965. Journ. Petrology. 6, 365 [M.A. 19-147].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, (I.), 1968. Min. Mag. 36, 1061 [M.A. 69-311]. in press. Medd. Gronland.Google Scholar
Pulvertaft, (T. C. R.), 1961. Medd. Gronland, 123, No. 6, 36 [M.A. 16-82].Google Scholar
Ragland, (P.C.), 1970. Lithos, 3, 167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Read, (H.H.), 1931. Mem. Geol. Surv. Scotland (explanation of sheets 108 and 1O9).Google Scholar
Smith, (J.V.), 1961. Amer. Min. 46, 1489 [M.A. 16-76].Google Scholar
Smith, (J.V.), 1970. Lithos, 3, 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, (J.V.), and Mackenzie, (W.S.), 1961. Estudios Geolegicos, Cursillos y Conferencias, 8, 39.Google Scholar
Thompson, (R.N.) and Mackenzie, (W.S.), 1967. Amer. Journ. Sci. 265, 714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, (C.P.) and Tuttle, (O.F.), 1960. Ibid. 258, 664 [M.A. 15-220].Google Scholar
Tilley, (C.E.), 1958. Trans. Edinb. Geol. Soc. 17, 156 [M.A. 14-353].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilling, (R.I.), 1968. Journ. Petrology. 9, 331 [M.A. 69-2309].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, (O.F.), 1952. Journ. Geol. 60, 107 [M.A. 12-256].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, (O.F.), and Bowen, (N.L.), 1958. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem. 74 [M.A. 14-89].Google Scholar
Upton, (B. G. J.), 1960. Medd. Gronland, 123, No. 4, I [M.A. 15-301].Google Scholar
Vorma, (A.), 1971. Bull. Comm. Gdol. Finlande, 246.Google Scholar
Wright, (T.L.), 1964. Amer. Min.. 49, 714 [M.A. 17-88].Google Scholar
Wright, (T.L.), 1967. Ibid. 52, 117 [M.A. 19-308].Google Scholar
Yoder, (H.S.), Stewart, (D.B.), and Smith, (J.R.), 1957. Ann. Rep. Geophys. Lab. Carnegie Inst. Washington, 56, 206.Google Scholar