Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T13:41:51.386Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chemical speciation terminology: chromium chemistry and cancer

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

J. H. Duffus
J. H. Duffus*
Affiliation:
The Edinburgh Centre for Toxicology, 43 Mansionhouse Road, Edinburgh EH9 2JD, UK
*
*E-mail: j.h.duffus@blueyonder.co.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In classical toxicology, speciation of carbon is taken for granted and the carbon compounds responsible for toxicity are always described with the appropriate chemical nomenclature. By contrast, speciation of other elements is largely ignored and elements other than carbon are often condemned as toxic because of evidence relating toxicity to only a few of the chemical species in which they occur. In some cases, such as chromium, the distinction between oxidation states (chromium III and chromium VI) may be recognized as important. The fact that chromium VI may only be a toxicological problem in certain well defined forms, such as specific chromate salts that may cause nasal and lung cancer, and then only by the respiratory route of exposure, is largely ignored. Failure to consider properly chemical speciation of elements other than carbon can lead to poor use of our resources. Laws and regulations based on simple elemental analysis may wrongly condemn environmental media or products as toxic and prevent the use of important resources.

Keywords

speciationmetaltoxicitychromiumcarcinogenicity
Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 69 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 557 - 562
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ACGIH (2005) 2005 TLVs and BEIs based on the Documentation of the Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents and Biological Exposure Indices. ACGIH Worldwide, Cincinnati, Ohio, USAGoogle Scholar
Cornelis, R., Caruso, J., Crews, H. and Heumann, K. (2003) Handbook of Elemental Speciation: Techniques and Methodology. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, M. (2000) Chromium and nickel. Pp. 113–128 in: Molecular Biology and Toxicology of Metals (Zalups, R.K. and Koropatnick, J., editors). Taylor and Francis, London & New York.Google Scholar
Cotton, F.A., Wilkinson, G. and Gaus, P.L. (1987) Basic Inorganic Chemistry. 2nd edition. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Davies, J.M. (1984) Lung cancer mortality among workers making lead chromate and zinc chromate pigments at three English factories. British Journal of Industrial Medicine, 41, 158–169.Google ScholarPubMed
Debetto, P. and Luciani, S. (1988) Toxic effect of chromium on cellular metabolism. Science of the Total Environment, 71, 365–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeFlora, S. (2000) Threshold mechanisms and site specificity in chromium (VI) carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis, 21, 533—541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFlora, S., Camoirano, A., Bagnasco, M., Bennicelli, C., Corbett, G.E. and Kerger, B.D. (1997) Estimates of the chromium (VI) reducing capacity in human body compartments as a mechanism for attenuating its potential toxicity and carcinogenicity. Carcinogenesis, 8, 531—537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffus, J.H. (2003) Toxicology of metals - science confused by poor use of terminology. Archives of Environmental Health, 58, 263–265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ECETOC (2003) Environmental Risk Assessment of Difficult Substances. Technical Report No. 88. European Centre for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals, Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission (2005) European Chemicals Bureau — Legislation. Website: http://ecb.jrc.it/Google Scholar
Frenzel-Beyme, R. (1983) Lung cancer mortality of workers employed in chromate pigment factories; a multicentric European epidemiological study. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 105, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goyer, R.A. and Clarkson, T.W. (2001) Toxic Effects of Metals. Pp. 811–867 in: Casarett and Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th edition (Klaasen, CD., editor). McGraw Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Haguenoer, J.M., Dubois, C., Frimat, P., Cantineau, A., Lefrancois, H. and Furon, D. (1982) Mortalite par cancer broncho-pulmonaire dans une fabrique de pigments a base de chromates de plomb et de zinc. Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Prevention of Occupational Cancer, Helsinki, 1981. ILO Occupational Safety and Health Series No 46. International Labour Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Hayes, R.B. (1997) The carcinogenicity of metals in humans. Cancer Causes Control, 8, 371—385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodson, M.E. (2004) Heavy metals — geochemical bogey men. Environmental Pollution, 129, 341–343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
IARC (1990) Chromium, Nickel and Welding. IARC Monographs, 49. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.Google Scholar
Jones, L. and Atkins, P.W. (1999) Chemistry: Molecules, Matter and Change, 4th edition. W.H. Freeman, New York.Google Scholar
O'Flaherty, E.J. (1994) Comparison of reference dose with estimated safe and adequate daily dietary intake for chromium. Pp. 213–218 in: Risk Assessment of Essential Elements (Merz, W., Abernathy, CO. and Olin, S.S., editors). ILSI Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Paustenbach, D.J., Finley, B.L., Mowat, F.S. and Kerger, B.D. (2003) Human health risk and exposure assessment of chromium (VI) in tap water. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health A, 66, 1295–1339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petrilli, F.L. and DeFlora, S. (1978) Metabolic deactivation of hexavalent chromium mutagenicity. Mutation Research, 54, 139–147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suzuki, Y. and Fukuda, K. (1990) Reduction of hexavalent chromium by ascorbic acid and glu- tathione with special reference to the rat lung. Archives of Toxicology, 64, 169—176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Templeton, D.M., Ariese, F., Cornells, R., Danielsson, L.-G., Muntau, H. and van Leeuwen, H.P. (2000) Guidelines for terms related to chemical speciation and fractionation of elements. Definitions, structural aspects and methodological approaches (IUPAC Recommendations 2000). Pure and Applied Chemistry, 72, 1453–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USEPA (1998) Toxicological Review of Hexavalent Chromium. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Wiegand, H.J., Ottenwalder, H. and Bolt, H.M. (1985) Fast uptake kinetics in vitro of 51Cr(VI) by red blood cells of man and rat. Archives of Toxicology, 57, 31–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed