Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-89wxm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T17:30:29.468Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Argentian mercurian tetrahedrite, a new variety, from the Chiprovtsi ore deposit, Western Stara-Planina mountains, Bulgaria

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Vassil At. Atanasov
Vassil At. Atanasov*
Affiliation:
Higher Institute of Mining and Geology, Sofia 56, Bulgaria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

An electron-probe microanalysis of tetrahedrite occurring together with the latest-deposited pyrite-cinnabar association in the Chiprovtsi lead-silver deposit yielded more than 16 wt. % Ag and more than 18 wt. % Hg. X-ray powder examination established an extremely large unit-cell edge, a 10.64±0.01 Å. Vickers microhardness 223 to 237 kg/mm2. The chemical formula derived on the basis of the analyses made is quite near to Cu6+(Cu+, Ag+)4(Hg,Zn)2(Sb,As)4S13. There is not any antiparallelism between Ag and Hg in tetrahedrite. The name proposed for all stages of simultaneous isomorphic replacement along the Cu+-Ag+ and Cu2+-Hg2+(Zn2+,Fe2+) directions is argentian mercurian tetrahedrite. The upper limits of the Ag and Hg content are expected to be Cu6Ag4Hg2(Sb,As)4S13. It is the six copper atoms (Cu4+;Cu22+), sited in the Laves’ polyhedra, that are replaced by Ag+ and Hg2+ respectively.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 40 , Issue 311 , September 1975 , pp. 233 - 237
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[Atanasov, (V. A.)] (Ann. É;cole Sup. Mines Géol. Sofia), 17, fasc. 2, 248-66.Google Scholar
[Belov, (N. V.)] (Min. Mag. Lvov Univ.), 6, 21-34.Google Scholar
Berry, (L. G.) and Thompson, (R. M.), 1962. Geol. Soc. Amer. Mere. 85 (The Peacock Atlas).Google Scholar
Dimitrov, (C.), 1964. Ber. Geol. Ges. D.D.R. 9, Heft 2.Google Scholar
[Indolev, (L. N.), Nevoisa, (G. G.), and Bryzgalov, (I. A.)] CCCP. (Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. URSS), 199, 1146-9.Google Scholar
[Kostov, (I. N.)] (Mem. All-Union Min. Soc.), 86, 336-42.Google Scholar
[Lazarenko, (E. K.)] (Min. Mag. Lvov. Univ.), 10, 171-211.Google Scholar
[Mincheva-Stefanova, (I.), Gorova, (M.), and Pavlova, (M.)] 1964. (Review of the Bulgarian Geol. Soc.), 25, 181-6.Google Scholar
Pauling, (L. S.) and Neuman, (E. W.), 1934. Zeits. Krist. 88, 54-62.[M.A. 6-39].Google Scholar
[Sakharova, (M. S.)] CaxaρoBa, (M. C.) 1966. (Geol. ore-deposits), 8, 23-40.Google Scholar
Shimada, (N.) and Hirowatari, (F.), 1972. Japan Min. Journ. 7, 77-87.Google Scholar
Springer, (G.), 1967. Fortschr. Min. 45, 103-24.Google Scholar
Springer, (G.), 1969. Neues Jahrb. Min. Monatsh. 1-48.Google Scholar
Wuensch, (B. I.), 1964. Zeits. Krist. 119, 437-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar