Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-s9k8s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T14:59:36.247Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Silica percentage as a factor in igneous-rock classification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

A. K. Wells*
Affiliation:
King's College, University of London

Extract

In previous editions of Hatch's ‘Petrology of the igneous rocks’ including the last two, for the revision of which the writer was largely responsible, historical precedent was followed and the main lines of classification were based on variation in the silica percentage. In preparing for the new post-war edition considerable thought has been given to this matter. The weakness of the scheme has become increasingly apparent to the writer, and it is now obvious that no juggling with the selected ranges of silica percentage chosen to delimit the ‘acid’, ‘intermediate’, and ‘basic’ categories can result in a workable, logical scheme. Silica percentage as a basis of rock classification must be abandoned for the reasons discussed below.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1949

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 689 note 1 Johannsen, A., A descriptive petrography of the igneous rocks. Chicago, 1937, vol. 3, p. 4. [M.A. 6–483.]Google Scholar

page 689 note 2 Shand, S. J., Eruptive rocks. 3rd edit., London and New York, 1947, p. 370. M.A. 10–305.]Google Scholar

page 692 note 1 Johannsen, A., loc. cit., vol. 2, p. 151.Google Scholar