Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T07:25:46.106Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A numerical system of classification for chlorites and septechlorites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

W. R. Phillips*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah

Summary

Only two, or at most three, variables can be considered on a two-dimensional composition diagram; six variables must be fixed to completely define a variety of the chlorite or septechlorite groups. The positions of tetrahedral coordination may be described by a single variable and positions of sixfold coordination require three independent variables for complete definition. The number of OH ions is probably very near the theoretical value of eight, however, it may vary somewhat from this value, and, in so doing, influences the ratio of trivalent and bivalent cations in octahedral coordination.

The normal 14 Å chlorites and 7 Å septechlorites have traditionally been associated together and, although they represent two distinct structural groups, are considered together for classification purposes, since they share many identical variety compositions; a sixth variable denotes structural type, as determined by X-ray powder diffraction or D.T.A.

Each chlorite or septechlorite variety can be described by a numerical notation (chlorite number) consisting of six units and, by dividing the chlorite numbers into units according to accepted nomenclature, each possible chlorite composition can be assigned a variety name, and all variety names can be assigned to a definite composition range.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Foster, (M.D.), 1962. U.S.G.S. Prof, paper no. 414-A.Google Scholar
Grimm, (R.E.), 1953. Clay mineralogy, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Gruner, (J.W.), 1944. Amer. Min., vol. 29, p. 422.Google Scholar
Hey, (M.H.), 1954. Min. Mag., vol. 30, p. 277.Google Scholar
Nelson, (B.W.) and Roy, (R.), 1953. Ninth Quarterly Progress Report, School of Mineral Industries, Pennsylvania State College.Google Scholar
Nelson, (B.W.) 1958. Amer. Min., vol. 43, p. 707.Google Scholar
Orcel, (J.), 1926. Compt. Rend. Acad. Sci. Paris, vol. 183, p. 363.Google Scholar
Orcel, (J.), 1927. Bull. Soc. franc. Min., vol. 50, p. 75.Google Scholar
Pauling, (L.), 1930. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., vol. 16, p. 578.Google Scholar
Phillips, (W.R.), 1963. Min. Mag., vol. 33, p. 404.Google Scholar
Roy, (D.) and Roy, (E.)» 1954 Amer. Min., vol. 39, p. 957.Google Scholar
Tschermak, (G.), 1891. Sitz. Akad. Wiss. Wien., Math-nat. Kl., vol. 100, abt. 1, p. 29.Google Scholar
Winchell, (A.N.), 1926. Amer. Journ. Sci., ser. 5, vol. 11, p. 283.Google Scholar
Winchell, (A.N.), 1928. Ibid., vol. 13, p. 161.Google Scholar
Winchell, (A.N.), 1936. Amer. Min., vol. 21, p. 642.Google Scholar