Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T06:48:20.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A further investigation of tobermorite from Loch Eynort, Scotland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2018

J. A. Gard  and
H. F. W. Taylor
J. A. Gard
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen
H. F. W. Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Aberdeen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The specimen described by Claringbull and Hey (1952) has been re-examined using electron-microscope, electron-diffraction, X-ray, and dehydration isobar methods. It differs from other specimens in several respects. The basal spacing does not shrink appreciably on dehydration. The principal cleavage is (100) and not (001). The body-centred pseudo-cell of normal dimensions, but the distribution of the weak reflections differs from that found for other specimens. The mechanism of conversion into wollastonite has also been examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mineralogical magazine and journal of the Mineralogical Society , Volume 31 , Issue 236 , March 1957 , pp. 361 - 370
Copyright
Copyright © The Mineralogical Society of Great Britain and Ireland 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buerger, (M. J.), 1956. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., new ser., vol. 42, p. 113.Google Scholar
Claringbull, (G. F.) and Hey, (M. H.), 1952. Min. Mag., vol. 29, p. 960.Google Scholar
Cole, (W. F.), Sörum, (H.), and Taylor, (W. H.), 1951. Acta Cryst., vol. 4, p. 20 [M.A. 11427].Google Scholar
Dornberger-Schiff, (K.), Liebau, (F.), and Thilo, (E.), 1954. Naturwise., vol. 41, p. 551.Google Scholar
Dornberger-Schiff, (K.), Liebau, (F.), and Thilo, (E.), 1955. Acta Cryst., vol. 8, p. 752.Google Scholar
Gay, (P.), 1956. Min. Mag., vol. 31, p. 21.Google Scholar
Heddle, (M. F.), 1893. Trans. Geol. Soc. Glasgow, vol. 9, p. 254.Google Scholar
Heller, (L.) and Taylor, (H. F. W.), 1951. Journ. Chem. Soc., p. 2397 [M.A. 11-71].Google Scholar
McConnell, (J. D. C.), 1954. Min. Mag., vol. 30, p. 293.Google Scholar
Megaw, (H. D.) and Kelsey, (C. H.), 1956a. Nature, vol. 177, p. 390.Google Scholar
Megaw, (H. D.) and Kelsey, (C. H.), 1956b. Symp. Int. Union Crystallography, Madrid, 1956.Google Scholar
Mitsuishi, (T.), Nagasaki, (H.), and Uyeda, (R.), 1951. Proc. Japan Acad., vol. 27, p. 86.Google Scholar
Rang, (O.), 1953. Zeits. Physik, vol. 136, p. 465.Google Scholar
Taylor, (H. F. W.), 1953. Journ. Chem. Soc., p. 163 [M.A. 12-172].Google Scholar
Tolliday, (J.), 1956. Private communication.Google Scholar
Williams, (R. E.) and Wyckoff, (R. W. G.), 1944. Journ. Appl. Physics, vol. 15, p. 712.Google Scholar