Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-5cfd469876-2rqk5 Total loading time: 2.562 Render date: 2021-06-24T19:59:16.023Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true }

Why You Can't Squash this Bug!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2021

Stephen W. Carmichael
Affiliation:
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905
Corresponding
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

[]
Type
Carmichael's Concise Review
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2021

The diabolical ironclad beetle (DIB: Phloeodes diabolicus) is an oak-dwelling fungivore primarily residing on the west coast of North America. Entomologists who are fortunate enough to have one of these bugs in their collection are challenged when displaying it, since the steel pin used to mount the specimen often bends as it is inserted into the beetle. This is due to the particularly rugged exoskeletal forewings (elytra) of this beetle. The paired elytra are fused to provide a strong shield to resist predation by crushing or pecking. Also, this beetle uses its elytra as camouflage, resembling a stone. The elytra are about twice as dense as those of a typical flying beetle, demonstrating that they have evolved as an impressive protective shield rather than appendages for flight. This defensive capability is largely due to the microscopic arrangement of the tough organic components of the elytra. This microstructure was recently investigated by a large international team lead by Jesus Rivera and David Kisailus [Reference Rivera1] using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), compression testing, finite element analysis, and digital image correlation, among other methods. This elegant study has the potential for modern manufacturing to improve how certain materials are fastened together.

In the DIB the pair of elytra are fused by a robust interface. The median suture consists of interdigitated “jigsaw” arrangements of protruding segments, called blades, along the length of the abdomen. Whereas there are substantial differences in the geometry, thickness, and extent of interdigitation among beetles in general, the greatest number of interlocking elements is found in the DIB.

The protective capability of the elytra is derived from the strong median suture and reliance on lateral supports to redirect compressive forces around the internal organs. This protects the beetle and even allows it to survive being run over by a car. Observations of the exoskelton by SEM and micro-CT revealed three distinct lateral interfacial architectures that provide support between the elytra and the ventral cuticle: interdigitated, latching, and freestanding motifs. Further study with micro-CT showed that these regions merge seamlessly into one another along the length of the body. These and several other observations led Rivera et al. to surmise that the freestanding and interlocking supports enable deflection of the elytra and therefore increase the energy absorption during crushing events by providing compliance, while the interdigitated supports increase stiffness.

SEM of cross sections of the median suture revealed a laminated architecture, which, when placed under tensile loading, showed failure in the matrix, highlighting local delamination (Figure 1). Unlike homogeneous materials, which typically fail at their thinnest feature, the laminated microstructure within the blades of the suture enables considerable strain release and energy dissipation, circumventing catastrophic failure at the thinnest part of the blades. It appears that delamination within the microstructure of the blade prevents localized stresses that would cause failure at its thinnest part, thereby ensuring survival of this robust beetle.

Figure 1: Role of microstructure in the toughening of the medial suture. (a) False colored SEM micrograph of uncompressed transverse cross-sectional from the elytra of P. diabolicus. (Bl = Blades and St = Stops). Inset: Entire cross section of uncompressed elytra. (b) Laminated microstructure of blades before (top) and after (bottom) loading. (c) Charge contrast and false colored SEM micrograph of compressed elytra, highlighting crack initiation around blade regions depicted in (a). Inset: entire cross section of compressed elytra. (d) Computed tomography reconstruction of fractured suture, revealing multiple failure points (yellow arrows), including fiber bridging and delamination in the structure. (e) Comparison between normalized peak load and toughness of 3D printed laminated blades with the angle, θ, varied at 15°, 25°, and 50°. (f) Lagrangian strain distribution using digital image correlation (DIC), under tensile loading, of 3D-printed laminated blades with the angle, θ, equal to 25°, showing significant strain developing within the blade and subsequent delamination. (bottom) Finite element simulations showing delamination and strain distribution. (g) Ashby plot highlighting the strength and energy absorbance of composite-metal interfaces joined by laminated carbon fiber blades, randomly oriented chopped carbon fiber blades, and titanium-based engineering fasteners. (h) DIC showing variations in strain during tensile testing of composite-metal interfaces and revealing toughening mechanisms in laminated blades. (i) Suture-like designs used in turbine blades. Images courtesy of the laboratory of Dr. David Kisailus.

Rivera et al. suggest that the potential advantages of this design as a mechanical fastener may be applicable to manufactured structures that are subjected to high stress, such as turbine blades or aerospace structures. This and other designs revealed in the DIB could be useful in joining similar or dissimilar engineering materials, such as plastics and metals. Rivera et al. demonstrated that composites fabricated to mimic the DIB suture geometry and microstructure provide immediate advantages over current fasteners used in aviation manufacturing, providing enhanced strength and substantially increased toughness (defined as energy absorbed before failure). They fabricated carbon fiber composites that mimicked the laminated sutures, and their strength was slightly greater than a titanium-based aircraft fastener and the toughness was twice as great!

References

[1]Rivera, J et al. , Nature 586 (2020) 543–48. doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2813-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]The author gratefully acknowledges Dr. David Kisailus for reviewing this article.Google Scholar
You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Why You Can't Squash this Bug!
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Why You Can't Squash this Bug!
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Why You Can't Squash this Bug!
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *