Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-m8s7h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T21:20:12.186Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SCFV-6HIS Bioengineered for High Fidelity Labeling.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Marek Malecki
Affiliation:
Molecular Imaging Laboratories, University of California, San Diego, California.
Lea Tiongco
Affiliation:
Molecular Imaging Laboratories, University of California, San Diego, California.
Annie Hsu
Affiliation:
Molecular Imaging Laboratories, University of California, San Diego, California.
Nina Takeuchi
Affiliation:
Molecular Imaging Laboratories, University of California, San Diego, California.
Get access

Extract

In life sciences, the essential part of the functional molecular analysis is the unambiguous identification of biochemical composition of the observed structures. This analysis is expected to create a bridge between functional data pouring from biochemistry and molecular biology laboratories with the molecular architecture data available from ultrastructural images. This goal can be attained by application of various ultrastructural tags (See: Albrecht et al. 1992).

A new promising approach for high fidelity labeling is offered by molecular cloning and expression of molecules containing metal binding sites making them suitable for electron spectroscopic imaging (ESI) (Malecki 1995). A truly enormous potential of ESI relies in its ability for mapping of various elements within the same sample. Interactions of electrons with an atom result in the electrons specific energy loss. Based upon these energy losses distribution of the elements within the sample can be mapped.

Type
Labeling for Microscopy and Correlative Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Albrecht, et al. 1992. Methods Enzymol. 215:456-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessels, et al. 1995. Scanning Microscopy Suppl. 10:327-44.Google Scholar
Malecki, 1995. Scanning Microscopy Suppl. 10:126.Google Scholar
Malecki, et al. 1998. Microscopy and Microanalysis: 994-5. San Francisco Press Inc., San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar