Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8kt4b Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T15:31:11.431Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Scanned-Probe Microscopy of Elastomer Blends: Morphology and Mechanical Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Michael P. Mallamaci*
Affiliation:
Analytical Sciences Department, Corporate Research, The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Akron, OH44305USA
Get access

Extract

Scanned-probe microscopy (SPM) has found application to a variety of polymer systems, primarily for the examination of surface morphology and the assessment of surface properties. In fact, SPM is unique in its ability to probe both phase morphology and mechanical properties simultaneously. The examination of industrial elastomers and their blends by SPM techniques can provide morphological information historically obtained only by transmission-electron microscopy (TEM). Since contrast with the SPM can be generated by differences in mechanical response of the constituent phases, polymer blends which are difficult to etch or stain for TEM can be successfully examined. In many cases measurements of polymer morphology can be made more easily with SPM, since time-consuming steps associated with thin-section production and staining are not required. Contact and tapping-mode operation along with force modulation and phase measurement can be used to examine phase microstructure, phase morphology, filler type, filler distribution, and viscoelastic response in elastomer systems.

Type
Developments in Measuring Polymer Microstructures
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Magonov, S. N., Polymer Science, Ser. B 38(1996)34.Google Scholar
2. Galuska, A. A. et al., Surface and Interface Analysis 25(1997)418.3.0.CO;2-P>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kajiyama, T. et al., Macromolecules 27( 1994)7932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hoperetal, R.., Ultramicroscopy 60(1995)17.Google Scholar
5.Schwark, D. W. et al., J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 11(1992)352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Mareanukroh, M. et al., Rubber Chem. Techn. 69(1997)801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Annis, B. K. et al., Makromol. Chem. 193(1992)2589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Chen, J. T. and Thomas, E. L., J. Mater. Sci. 31(1996)2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. The author gratefully acknowledges C. J. Pearson and W. D. Vandever for their preparation of the bulk elastomer blend materials.Google Scholar