Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T18:56:14.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Role of Calcium Currents in E-C Coupling and Evolution of the T-System and SR in Developing Cultured Embryonic Amphibian Skeletal Muscle Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Gonzalez-Serratos H
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD21201USA
Cordoba-Rodriguez R
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD21201USA
Matteson D.R.
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD21201USA
Rozycka M.
Affiliation:
Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD21201USA
Get access

Extract

Adult frog phasic skeletal muscle cells have slow inward calcium current (ICa) (Stanfield, 1977) carried through L-type voltage dependent calcium channels. It has been suggested that ICa may play a role in E-C coupling (Cota & Stefani, 1981, 1989). However, phasic skeletal muscle cells contract for several minutes after the extracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]o) is lowered to <10-8 M (Armstrong et al, 1972). Therefore, extracellular Ca2+ (Ca2+o) is not essential for contraction in these fibers. It has been also shown, by blocking Ica that Ica is not essential for triggering contraction (Gonzalez-Serratos et al., 1982). These results have led to the conclusion that Ica has no obvious role in E-C coupling in adult amphibian phasic skeletal muscle. The question arises then as to what is the biological role Ica in phasic skeletal muscle? We have observed that embryonic skeletal muscle cells are capable of contracting during the first day of development in culture (Cordoba-Rodriguez, et al., 1996), before the T-system and the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR)may have fully developed (Flucher, et al., 1993).

Type
Philadelphia—The Other Motor City: Muscle and Non-Muscle Motility. A Dedication to Dr. Lee Peachey
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Armstrong, CM., Bezanilla, F.M. & Horowicz, P. (1972). Biochim. biophys. Acta 267, 605608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Cordoba-Rodriguez, R., Matteson, D. R. & Gonzalez-SerrtaosS, H. (1996). Biophysical journal 70 (2), A390.Google Scholar
3.Cota, G. & Stefani, E. (1981). J. Physiology 317, 303316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Cota, G. & Stefani, E. (1989). J. Physiology 94, 937951Google Scholar
5.Flucher, B. E., Takekura, H & Franzini-Armstrong, C. (1993). Developmental Biology 160, 135147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Garcia, J. & Beam, K. G. (1994). J. General Physiology 108, 107123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Gonzalez-Serratos, H., Valle-Aguilera, R., Lathrop, DA. & Garcia, M.C. (1982). Nature 298, 292294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Luttgau, H.Ch. & Spiecker, W.J. (1979). J. Physiol, Lond. 296, 411429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Moody-Corbett, F., Gilbert, R, Akabarali, H. & Hall, J. (1989). Canadian J.of Physiology & Pharmacology 67, 12591264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar