Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T10:57:35.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Position-Sensitive Atom Probe - A New Dimension In Atom Probe Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

A. Cerezo
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK.
P.J. Warren
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK.
G.D.W. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Materials, University of Oxford, Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PH, UK.
Get access

Extract

A possible description of the ideal microscope would be an instrument which was able to reconstruct, with atomic resolution and in 3 dimensions, both the position and the chemical identity of atoms in a material. The 3-dimensional atom probe (3DAP) is the technique which comes closest to this goal.

The position-sensitive atom probe (PoSAP) was the first 3DAP. In the PoSAP, the high magnification of the field-ion microscope is combined with the time-of-flight mass spectroscopy of the atom probe, and position-sensitive detection based on a wedge-and-strip anode, Fig.1. This combination allows the chemical identity and the original surface position to be determined for single atoms removed from a field-ion specimen by pulsed field evaporation. Continued field evaporation and analysis builds up a 3D image of the distribution of all the atomic species originally present in the material, Fig. 2.

Type
Imaging and Analysis at the Atomic Level: 30 Years of Atom Probe Field Ion Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Cerezo, A. et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 59 (1988) 862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Blavette, D. et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 64 (1993) 2911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Cerezo, A. et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 76/77 (1994) 374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Cerezo, A. et al., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 69 (1998) 49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Camus, P.P. et al., Appl. Surf. Sci. 87/88 (1995) 305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar