Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:42:28.572Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Nucleus Morphometry in Cultured Epithelial Cells Correlates with Phenotype

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2016

Ayyad Z. Khan ,
Tor P. Utheim ,
Catherine J. Jackson ,
Sjur Reppe ,
Torstein Lyberg  and
Jon R. Eidet
Ayyad Z. Khan*
Affiliation:
Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, P.O Box 1171, Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
Tor P. Utheim
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway Department of Oral Biology, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Sognsvannsveien 10, P.O. Box 1052, 0316 Oslo, Norway Department of Ophthalmology, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Drammen, Norway Faculty of Health Sciences, National Centre for Optics, Vision and Eye Care, Buskerud and Vestfold University College, Norway
Catherine J. Jackson
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
Sjur Reppe
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
Torstein Lyberg
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
Jon R. Eidet
Affiliation:
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway Department of Ophthalmology, Oslo University Hospital, Kirkeveien 166, P.O. Box 4956, Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
*
*Corresponding author.aakhan@studmed.uio.no
Get access

Abstract

Phenotype of cultured ocular epithelial transplants has been shown to affect clinical success rates following transplantation to the cornea. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship between cell nucleus morphometry and phenotype in three types of cultured epithelial cells. This study provides knowledge for the development of a non-invasive method of determining the phenotype of cultured epithelium before transplantation. Cultured human conjunctival epithelial cells (HCjE), human epidermal keratinocytes (HEK), and human retinal pigment epithelial cells (HRPE) were analyzed by quantitative immunofluorescence. Assessments of nucleus morphometry and nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio (N/C ratio) were performed using ImageJ. Spearman’s correlation coefficient was employed for statistical analysis. Levels of the proliferation marker PCNA in HCjE, HEK, and HRPE correlated positively with nuclear area. Nuclear area correlated significantly with levels of the undifferentiated cell marker ABCG2 in HCjE. Bmi1 levels, but not p63α levels, correlated significantly with nuclear area in HEK. The N/C ratio did not correlate significantly with any of the immunomarkers in HCjE (ABCG2, CK7, and PCNA) and HRPE (PCNA). In HEK, however, the N/C ratio was negatively correlated with levels of the undifferentiated cell marker CK14 and positively correlated with Bmi1 expression. The size of the nuclear area correlated positively with proliferation markers in all three epithelia. Morphometric indicators of phenotype in cultured epithelia can be identified using ImageJ. Conversely, the N/C ratio did not show a uniform relationship with phenotype in HCjE, HEK, or HRPE. N/C ratio therefore, may not be a useful morphometric marker for in vitro assessment of phenotype in these three epithelia.

Keywords

regenerative medicineN/C ratioRPEHCjEHEK
Type
Biological Applications
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 22 , Issue 3 , June 2016 , pp. 612 - 620
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Janabi, S., Huisman, A. & Van Diest, P.J. (2012). Digital pathology: Current status and future perspectives. Histopathology 61(1), 1–9.10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.03814.xGoogle Scholar
Ang, L.P., Tan, D.T., Cajucom-Uy, H., Phan, T.T., Beuerman, R.W. & Lavker, R.M. (2004). Reconstruction of the ocular surface by transplantation of a serum free cultivated conjunctival tissue equivalent. Ann Acad Med Singapore 33(5 Suppl), S55–S56.Google Scholar
Ang, L.P., Tanioka, H., Kawasaki, S., Ang, L.P., Yamasaki, K., Do, T.P., Thein, Z.M., Koizumi, N., Nakamura, T., Yokoi, N., Komuro, A., Inatomi, T., Nakatsukasa, M. & Kinoshita, S. (2010). Cultivated human conjunctival epithelial transplantation for total limbal stem cell deficiency. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(2), 758–764.10.1167/iovs.09-3379Google Scholar
Angello, J.C., Pendergrass, W.R., Norwood, T.H. & Prothero, J. (1987). Proliferative potential of human fibroblasts: An inverse dependence on cell size. J Cell Physiol 132(1), 125–130.Google Scholar
Arpitha, P., Prajna, N.V., Srinivasan, M. & Muthukkaruppan, V. (2005). High expression of p63 combined with a large N/C ratio defines a subset of human limbal epithelial cells: Implications on epithelial stem cells. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 46(10), 3631–3636.10.1167/iovs.05-0343Google Scholar
Arpitha, P., Prajna, N.V., Srinivasan, M. & Muthukkaruppan, V. (2008 a). A method to isolate human limbal basal cells enriched for a subset of epithelial cells with a large nucleus/cytoplasm ratio expressing high levels of p63. Microsc Res Tech 71(6), 469–476.10.1002/jemt.20573Google Scholar
Arpitha, P., Prajna, N.V., Srinivasan, M. & Muthukkaruppan, V. (2008 b). A subset of human limbal epithelial cells with greater nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio expressing high levels of p63 possesses slow-cycling property. Cornea 27(10), 1164–1170.Google Scholar
Barrandon, Y. & Green, H. (1985). Cell size as a determinant of the clone-forming ability of human keratinocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 82(16), 5390–5394.10.1073/pnas.82.16.5390Google Scholar
Budak, M.T., Alpdogan, O.S., Zhou, M., Lavker, R.M., Akinci, M.A. & Wolosin, J.M. (2005). Ocular surface epithelia contain ABCG2-dependent side population cells exhibiting features associated with stem cells. J Cell Sci 118(Pt 8), 1715–1724.Google Scholar
Cavalier-Smith, T. (2005). Economy, speed and size matter: Evolutionary forces driving nuclear genome miniaturization and expansion. Ann Bot 95(1), 147–175.10.1093/aob/mci010Google Scholar
Chen, Z., De Paiva, C.S., Luo, L., Kretzer, F.L., Pflugfelder, S.C. & Li, D.Q. (2004). Characterization of putative stem cell phenotype in human limbal epithelia. Stem Cells 22(3), 355–366.10.1634/stemcells.22-3-355Google Scholar
Cornish, T.C., Swapp, R.E. & Kaplan, K.J. (2012). Whole-slide imaging: Routine pathologic diagnosis. Adv Anat Pathol 19(3), 152–159.Google Scholar
Da Cruz, L., Chen, F.K., Ahmado, A., Greenwood, J. & Coffey, P. (2007). RPE transplantation and its role in retinal disease. Prog Retin Eye Res 26(6), 598–635.10.1016/j.preteyeres.2007.07.001Google Scholar
Dazard, J.E., Piette, J., Basset-Seguin, N., Blanchard, J.M. & Gandarillas, A. (2000). Switch from p53 to MDM2 as differentiating human keratinocytes lose their proliferative potential and increase in cellular size. Oncogene 19(33), 3693–3705.Google Scholar
Eidet, J.R., Pasovic, L., Maria, R., Jackson, C.J. & Utheim, T.P. (2014). Objective assessment of changes in nuclear morphology and cell distribution following induction of apoptosis. Diagn Pathol 9, 92.10.1186/1746-1596-9-92Google Scholar
Falbo, K.B. & Shen, X. (2006). Chromatin remodeling in DNA replication. J Cell Biochem 97(4), 684–689.10.1002/jcb.20752Google Scholar
Gao, F.B. & Raff, M. (1997). Cell size control and a cell-intrinsic maturation program in proliferating oligodendrocyte precursor cells. J Cell Biol 138(6), 1367–1377.Google Scholar
Gregory, T.R. (Ed.) (2005). Genome size evolution in animals, In The Evolution of the Genome, pp. 4–87. San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Harris, H. (1967). The reactivation of the red cell nucleus. J Cell Sci 2(1), 23–32.Google Scholar
Jara-Lazaro, A.R., Thamboo, T.P., Teh, M. & Tan, P.H. (2010). Digital pathology: Exploring its applications in diagnostic surgical pathology practice. Pathology 42(6), 512–518.Google Scholar
Le Beyec, J., Xu, R., Lee, S.Y., Nelson, C.M., Rizki, A., Alcaraz, J. & Bissell, M.J. (2007). Cell shape regulates global histone acetylation in human mammary epithelial cells. Exp Cell Res 313(14), 3066–3075.10.1016/j.yexcr.2007.04.022Google Scholar
Lyngholm, M., Vorum, H., Nielsen, K., Ostergaard, M., Honore, B. & Ehlers, N. (2008). Differences in the protein expression in limbal versus central human corneal epithelium – A search for stem cell markers. Exp Eye Res 87(2), 96–105.Google Scholar
Mao, Y. (2012). Nearest Neighbor Distances calculation with ImageJ (updated 4 January 2012) Available at https://icme.hpc.msstate.edu/mediawiki/index.php/Nearest_Neighbor_Distances_Calculation_with_ImageJ (retrieved June 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Marchini, G., Pedrotti, E., Pedrotti, M., Barbaro, V., Di Iorio, E., Ferrari, S., Bertolin, M., Ferrari, B., Passilongo, M., Fasolo, A. & Ponzin, D. (2012). Long-term effectiveness of autologous cultured limbal stem cell grafts in patients with limbal stem cell deficiency due to chemical burns. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 40(3), 255–267.Google Scholar
Meyer-Blazejewska, E.A., Kruse, F.E., Bitterer, K., Meyer, C., Hofmann-Rummelt, C., Wunsch, P.H. & Schlotzer-Schrehardt, U. (2010). Preservation of the limbal stem cell phenotype by appropriate culture techniques. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 51(2), 765–774.Google Scholar
Nazeran, H., Rice, F., Moran, W. & Skinner, J. (1995). Biomedical image processing in pathology: A review. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 18(1), 26–38.Google Scholar
Neumann, F.R. & Nurse, P. (2007). Nuclear size control in fission yeast. J Cell Biol 179(4), 593–600.Google Scholar
Pantanowitz, L. (2010). Digital images and the future of digital pathology. J Pathol Inform 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
Parsa, R., Yang, A., McKeon, F. & Green, H. (1999). Association of p63 with proliferative potential in normal and neoplastic human keratinocytes. J Invest Dermatol 113(6), 1099–1105.Google Scholar
Pasovic, L., Eidet, J., Lyberg, T., Messelt, E., Aabel, P. & Utheim, T. (2014). Antioxidants improve the viability of stored adult retinal pigment Epithelial-19 cultures. Ophthalmol Ther (3), 49–61.10.1007/s40123-014-0024-9Google Scholar
Pellegrini, G., Dellambra, E., Golisano, O., Martinelli, E., Fantozzi, I., Bondanza, S., Ponzin, D., McKeon, F. & De Luca, M. (2001). p63 identifies keratinocyte stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98(6), 3156–3161.10.1073/pnas.061032098Google Scholar
Pellegrini, G., Traverso, C.E., Franzi, A.T., Zingirian, M., Cancedda, R. & De Luca, M. (1997). Long-term restoration of damaged corneal surfaces with autologous cultivated corneal epithelium. Lancet 349(9057), 990–993.Google Scholar
Priya, C.G., Prasad, T., Prajna, N.V. & Muthukkaruppan, V. (2013). Identification of human corneal epithelial stem cells on the basis of high ABCG2 expression combined with a large N/C ratio. Microsc Res Tech 76(3), 242–248.Google Scholar
Rama, P., Matuska, S., Paganoni, G., Spinelli, A., De Luca, M. & Pellegrini, G. (2010). Limbal stem-cell therapy and long-term corneal regeneration. N Engl J Med 363(2), 147–155.10.1056/NEJMoa0905955Google Scholar
Rocha, R., Vassallo, J., Soares, F., Miller, K. & Gobbi, H. (2009). Digital slides: Present status of a tool for consultation, teaching, and quality control in pathology. Pathol Res Pract 205(11), 735–741.Google Scholar
Sonoda, S., Spee, C., Barron, E., Ryan, S.J., Kannan, R. & Hinton, D.R. (2009). A protocol for the culture and differentiation of highly polarized human retinal pigment epithelial cells. Nat Protoc 4(5), 662–673.Google Scholar
Tseng, H. & Green, H. (1994). Association of basonuclin with ability of keratinocytes to multiply and with absence of terminal differentiation. J Cell Biol 126(2), 495–506.10.1083/jcb.126.2.495Google Scholar
Utheim, T.P. (2013). Limbal epithelial cell therapy: Past, present, and future. Methods Mol Biol 1014, 3–43.10.1007/978-1-62703-432-6_1Google Scholar
Vergani, L., Grattarola, M. & Nicolini, C. (2004). Modifications of chromatin structure and gene expression following induced alterations of cellular shape. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 36(8), 1447–1461.Google Scholar
Watt, F.M. & Green, H. (1981). Involucrin synthesis is correlated with cell size in human epidermal cultures. J Cell Biol 90(3), 738–742.10.1083/jcb.90.3.738Google Scholar
Yang, X., Moldovan, N.I., Zhao, Q., Mi, S., Zhou, Z., Chen, D., Gao, Z., Tong, D. & Dou, Z. (2008). Reconstruction of damaged cornea by autologous transplantation of epidermal adult stem cells. Molecular Vision 14, 1064.Google Scholar