Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T17:44:55.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

New Projects for Superstem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

L. M. Brown
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, EnglandCB4 3DG.
A. L. Bleloch
Affiliation:
Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, EnglandCB4 3DG.
Get access

Extract

It is proposed to build two high-performance general-user instruments at Daresbury, Cheshire, where the present U.K. synchrotron facility is located. The instruments can be used on-site, where accommodation for visitors is already available. They can also be used remotely, via the internet. The features of the instruments are: aberration-corrected optics, voltage-stabilised electron spectrometer, and multi-specimen stages to facilitate rapid throughput of routine work. We anticipate that a sub-Angstrom probe size will be available for incoherent HAADF imaging, and PEELS with an energy resolution better than 0.3V for losses up to 2kV. The operating voltage will be l00kV.

The new instruments will allow better analysis of continuing problems. Anticipated developments are as follows:

1. Study of helium bubbles in reactor materials: Recently, accurate quantification of helium has been achieved and a quantitative explanation has been given for the ‘blue shift’, that is, the increasing threshold energy for the Is to 2p transition due to quantum confinement of the excited state with increasing gas pressure.

Type
The Theory and Practice of Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bleloch, A. L., (principal investigator), and seven others: ‘The SuperStem: a multi-user sub-angstrom analytical electron microscope facility’, submitted to EPSRC April 1999. Case for support available on request to the authors.Google Scholar
2.Krivanek, O. L. et. al., Ultramicroscopy 78 (1999) pp 111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bleloch, A. L. et. al., EMAG 99, Inst. Phys. Conf.Ser. No. 161, Kiely, C. J. Ed. pp 195198, I.o.P.Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia.Google Scholar
4.Walsh, C. A. et. al., Phil Mag 80A, to appear shortly.Google Scholar
5.Essex, D. W. et. al. EMAG 99, Inst. Phys. Conf. Ser. No 161, Kiely, C. J. Ed., pp 187- 190, I.o.P. Publishing, Bristol and Philadelphia.Google Scholar
6.Muller, D. A. et. al, Phys Rev B57(1998)pp 81818202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Muller, D. A. et. al., Nature 399 (1999) pp 758761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Brown, Mick et. al., Physics World 10 (1997) pp 4549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Batson, P.E. et. al., Phys Rev Lett 67 (1991) pp 350353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Particulate Matter: Properties and effects upon health, Edited by R. L. Maynard and C. V. Howard, Bios Scientific Publishers in association with the Royal Microscopical Society, Oxford, 1999.Google Scholar