No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Low Voltage Biological X-Ray Microanalysis: Progress and a Remaining Problem
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 July 2020
Extract
Experimental work in a number of research groups over the past five years have demonstrated, unequivocally, that low voltage i.e. 5kV and below, quantitative x-ray microanalysis is a valid analytical technique which can be applied to a wide range of specimens. The advantages of this approach are now generally well known and include improved image contrast, diminished bulk charging of the sample and for bulk specimens, a reduction in the size of the beam-sample interactive volume from which the x-rays are generated, and as a consequence, a considerable improvement in the microanalytical spatial resolution. In addition, low voltages ensure a sensitive surface analysis procedure which provides true topographic contrast and that in the case of light element analysis, quantitation is simplified because the atomic number (Z), absorption (A) and fluorescence (F) effects are minimised. All these advantages are improved further if one uses a field emission gun as the primary electron source.
- Type
- Low Voltage Scanning Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Microanalysis
- Information
- Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 6 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis 2000, Microscopy Society of America 58th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 34th Annual Meeting, Microscopical Society of Canada/Societe de Microscopie de Canada 27th Annual Meeting, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania August 13-17, 2000 , August 2000 , pp. 758 - 759
- Copyright
- Copyright © Microscopy Society of America
References
1. Joy, D. C. & Joy, C. S.. Micron 27 247–263 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Joy, D. C.. Journal of Microscopy 191 74–82 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Joy, D. C.. Microscopy & Microanalysis (Suppl. 2) 302–303 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Various Authors. Microscopy & Microanalysis (Suppl. 2) 302—319 1999Google Scholar
5. Echlin, P.. Low Temperature Microscopy and Analysis. Plenum Press. New York 1992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Echlin, P.. Microscopy & Microanalysis. 4 577–584 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Echlin, P.Microscopy & Microanalysis. (Suppl. 2) 312–313Google Scholar
8. Echlin, P.. Microscopy & Microanalysis. (Suppl. 2) 574–575Google Scholar
9. Echlin, P.. Microscopy & Microanalysis 6 (In Press) 2000.Google Scholar