Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g78kv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T14:23:15.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Image Reconstruction from the Oversampled Diffraction Pattern

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J. Miao
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, SUNY at Stony Brook, NY, 11794
H. Chapman
Affiliation:
Department of X-ray Optics, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA94551
D. Sayre
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, SUNY at Stony Brook, NY, 11794
Get access

Extract

In recording the intensity of the diffraction pattern from an arbitrary object, the phase is lost. This gives rise to the “phase problem”in reconstructing the object in crystallography, where the pattern is sampled at the Bragg peaks. It was shown by Bates and by Hayes that sampling at twice crystallographic density (2x oversampling) in each dimension is sufficient in principle to obtain a full reconstruction of the object. It was pointed out by Sayre in 1991 that the diffraction pattern of a non-crystalline object is continuous, therefore the pattern may be sampled on a finer scale, providing the additional information for the image reconstruction.

The loss of phase corresponds to a loss of half the information. It seems therefore that 2x oversampling in each dimension (8x in three dimension) may be unnecessary. We find that oversampling 1.67x in each dimension is sufficient to obtain a reconstruction, even in the presence of noise. However our algorithm fails when we reduce the oversampling factor to 1.58x.

Type
Computational Methods for Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bates, R.H.T., Optik 61(1982)247.Google Scholar
2.Hayes, M.H., IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 30(1982)140.10.1109/TASSP.1982.1163863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Sayre, D., in Schenk, H. Ed., Direct Methods of Solving Crystal Structure. Plenum Series B Physics vol. 274(1991)353.10.1007/978-1-4899-3692-9_33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Fienup, J.R., Opt. Lett. 3(1978)27.10.1364/OL.3.000027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. The authors gratefully acknowledge Prof. Kirz, J. for many helpful discussions and Prof. Jacobsen, C. for the use of the computer facility.Google Scholar