Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-7tdvq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-16T10:47:25.900Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Identifying Molecular Counterparts of Functional Gradients in Biomaterials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

J. Herbert Waite*
Affiliation:
Marine Science Institute, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106, USA
Get access

Abstract

many naturally occurring structures are, in fact, composite materials with functionally graded mechanical properties. in manufacturing, achieving such graded properties is critical when joining two materials of significantly different elastic moduli, thermal or electronic characteristics. One assumes that similar imperatives are at play in the profusion of biological examples of gradients. Two gradient biosystems, in particular, have been the focus of our attention: These are mussel byssal threads and polychaete jaws. Mussel byssal threads are composites consisting of anisotropically packed discontinuous fibers in an amorphous matrix all coated by a protective cuticle. The threads are produced by process resembling reaction injection molding and imparted with a longitudinal gradient of mechanical properties ranging from stiff and tough distally to extensible and rubbery proximally. Collagen is the principal tensile polymer as determined by fiber x-ray diffraction, however, the mechanical properties of typical tendon are poorly matched with those of byssal threads.

Type
Advances in Imaging Techniques for Biomaterlals (Organized by S. Eppel)
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Waite, J. H.. Results & Problems in Cell Differentiation 19(1992) 27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

2. Smeathers, J. E. and Vincent, J. F. V.. J. Molluscan Stud. 49(1979)219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

3. Bell, E. C. and Gosline, J. M.. J. Exp. Biol. 199 (1996) 1005.Google Scholar

4. Gathercole, L. J. & Keller, A., Structure of Fibrous Biopolymers, ed. by Atkins, E.D.T., and Keller, A., Butterworths, London, (1975) 153.Google Scholar

5. Qin, X. X.et al., J. Biol. Chem. 272 (1997) 32623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

6. Coyne, K.J.et al., Science 277 (1997) 1830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. Qin., X. X. & Waite, J. H.. J. Exp. Biol. 198 (1995) 633.Google Scholar

8. Bryan, G.W. & Gibbs, P.E.. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc.UK 60 (1980) 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9. Bryan, G.W.& Gibbs, P.E..J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 59 (1979) 969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. Michel, C.et al., Bull. Biol. France Belg. 107 (1973) 301.Google Scholar

11. Voss-Foucart, M.F.et al., Biochem System . 1(1973) 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12. This research was supported by funds from the Office of Naval Research and the Biomaterials Program at the National Institutes of HealthGoogle Scholar