Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-c654p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T10:19:18.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Energy-Filtered Imaging and Spectrum Imaging: Which One Should I Choose?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

P.A. Crozier*
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 85287-1704
Get access

Extract

There are now several commercially available methods for performing spatially resolved electron energy-loss spectroscopy in a transmission electron microscopy. In the energy-filtering electron microscope (EFEM), an Omega filter (Zeiss 912) or a post-column magnetic-prism filter (Gatan Imaging Filter) forms an electron image with electrons of a selected energy loss. A series of such images are acquired to provide spatially resolved information on sections of the energy-loss spectrum. These images can be processed to yield elemental maps from areas of interest in the material. In the spectrum imaging method (EMISPEC System), a small focused electron probe is rastered over the sample and a parallel energy-loss spectrum acquired from each point in the selected area. These spectra are then batch processed and information like elemental distributions extracted and displayed in the form of a map. Each of these two approaches has advantages and disadvantages and the appropriate choice is often dictated by factors such as time constraints, sample stability and the nature of the information of interest.

Type
Analytical Electron Microscopy
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sauer, H.et al, Ultramicroscopy 49(1993)19810.1016/0304-3991(93)90226-NCrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. This work was supported by the HREM Industrial Associates Program of Arizona State University (ASU) and was performed in the Center for HREM at ASU. We would like to acknowledge helpful discussion with Dr. Lawrence Garvie of the ASU Geology Department.Google Scholar