Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-fv566 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-18T23:37:11.966Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Co60 Irradiation on Muscle Fiber Types of the Grass Frog

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Glenn M. Cohen
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Troy State University, Troy, AL36082
Margaret F. Scott
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Troy State University, Troy, AL36082
Get access

Extract

Striated skeletal muscle has been considered radioresistant because it is highly differentiated and post-mitotic. Striated muscle does, however, respond to irradiation with morphological and biochemical changes after short and long latency periods; vascular and/or neurological impairments might contribute to the delayed responses to irradiation.

The objective of the present study was to determine the susceptibility of three amphibian muscle fiber types to Co60 irradiation. In amphibians, the three major fiber types are 1) large twitch fibers, which contain low levels of mitochondrial enzymes and lipids, but intermediate levels of glycogen; 2) small twitch fibers, which contain high levels of both glycolytic and mitochondrial enzymes (FIG. 1); and tonic fibers, which contain low levels of all three histochemical markers. Thus, the determination of susceptibility of different amphibian fiber types to irradiation might indicate whether the metabolic characteristics of the fibers, rather than morphological or electrical properties, could serve as an early indicator of radiation damage.

Type
Biomedical Applications
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.Warren, S., Arch. Pathol. 35(1943)347.Google Scholar
2.Bergström, R. M. and A. Salmi, , Exptl. Cell Res. 26(1962)226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Khan, M. Y., J. Neuropathol. 33(1974)42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Zeman, W. and Solomon, W., in Berdjis, C. C., Ed., Pathology of Irradiation, Baltimore Williams and Wilkins (1971)171.Google Scholar
5.Hodge, J. E. and Hofreiter, B. T., in Whistler, R. L. and Wolfram, M. L., Eds., Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry. New York Academic Press (1962)389.Google Scholar
6. This research was conducted at the Florida Institute of Technology and was supported by a NASA grant.Google Scholar