Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-pl66f Total loading time: 0.145 Render date: 2021-09-21T20:58:44.333Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Comparison Between Commercial and Aquatic Lily Lignins

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2019

M.E. Mendoza-Duarte
Affiliation:
Ingeniería y Química de Materiales, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, S.C. (CIMAV) Chihuahua, México.
J.L. Espinoza-Acosta
Affiliation:
Ingeniería y Química de Materiales, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, S.C. (CIMAV) Chihuahua, México.
C. Leyva-Porras
Affiliation:
Ingeniería y Química de Materiales, Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, S.C. (CIMAV) Chihuahua, México.
I.A. Estrada-Moreno*
Affiliation:
CONACyT – Centro de Investigación en Materiales Avanzados, S.C., Chihuahua, México.
*Corresponding
*Corresponding author: ivan.estrada@cimav.edu.mx
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Applications of Integrated Electron Probe Microscopy and Microanalysis Techniques in Characterizing Natural and Synthetic Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2019 

References

[1]Watkins, D, Nuruddin, M, Hosur, M, Tcherbi-Narteh, A, and Jeelani, S, Journal of Materials Research and Technology 4 (2015), p. 26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Gordobil, O, Delucis, R, Egüéss, I, and Labidi, J, Industrial Crops and Products 72 (2015), p. 46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Klapiszewski, L, Nowacka, M, Milczarek, G, and Jesionowski, T, Carbohydrate Polymers 94 (2013), p. 345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Sifontes, M, and Domine, M, Avances En Ciencias E Ingeniería, 4 (2013), p. 15.Google Scholar
[5]The authors thank Karla Campos, Daniel Lardizabal and Luis de la Torre for their helpful assistance.Google Scholar
You have Access

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Comparison Between Commercial and Aquatic Lily Lignins
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Comparison Between Commercial and Aquatic Lily Lignins
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Comparison Between Commercial and Aquatic Lily Lignins
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *