Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-19T01:09:24.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bifurcation Patterns and Branching Exponents in Branchial Vessels in Tadpoles of Xenopus laevis Daudinduring Metamorphosis-3D-Measurements from Microvascular Corrosion Casts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

B. Minnich ,
H. Bartel ,
R. Karch ,
W. Schreiner  and
A. Lametschwandtner
B. Minnich
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg, Department of Vascular- and Performance Biology, A-5020Salzburg, Austria
H. Bartel
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg, Department of Vascular- and Performance Biology, A-5020Salzburg, Austria
R. Karch
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Department of Medical Computer Sciences, General Hospital, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
W. Schreiner
Affiliation:
University of Vienna, Department of Medical Computer Sciences, General Hospital, A-1090, Vienna, Austria
A. Lametschwandtner
Affiliation:
University of Salzburg, Department of Vascular- and Performance Biology, A-5020Salzburg, Austria
Get access

Abstract

Introduction

Fluid transport systems of organisms [1] in general and the blood vascular system in particular are considered to be optimally designed. From Murray's laws [2] it is concluded that an arterial bifurcation where the diameter of the parent vessel (d0) relates to the larger (d1) and the smaller daughter vessel (d2) according to d03 = d13 + d23 is optimal. Interestingly, existing data predominantly refer to arterial branchings of the fully developed circulatory system of mammals. to the best of our knowledge there are no data available on arterial bifurcations and venous mergings in an initially growing but then regressing tubular system of blood vessels as it is found in the gill filter apparatus of the anuran tadpole where the highly complex three-dimensional vascular network totally disappears at the end of metamorphosis.

Type
Recent Techniques for the Fixation and Staining of Biological Samples (Organized by M. Sanders and K. McDonald)
Information
Microscopy and Microanalysis , Volume 7 , Issue S2: Proceedings: Microscopy & Microanalysis 2001, Microscopy Society of America 59th Annual Meeting, Microbeam Analysis Society 35th Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California August 5-9, 2001 , August 2001 , pp. 1188 - 1189
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References:

1.LaBabera, M., Science, 249 (1990) 992–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Murray, C.D., Journal of General Physiology, 9 (1926) 835–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Aichhorn, H. et al., Scanning, 18 (1996) 447–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Minnich, B. et al., Journal of Microscopy, 1 (1999) 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Karch, R. et al., in Power, H., Brebbia, C.A. and Kenny, J., Eds., Simulations in Biomedicine IV, Perugia (1998) 3–12.Google Scholar