Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T16:35:31.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Observation of NBC Precipitates In Steels In The Nanometer Range Using A Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscope

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

Raynald Gauvin
Affiliation:
Département de génie mécanique, Université de Sherbrooke, Québec, CanadaJ1K 2R1.
Steve Yue
Affiliation:
Department of Mining and Metallurgical Engineering, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, CanadaH3A 2A7.
Get access

Extract

The observation of microstructural features smaller than 300 nm is generally performed using Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) because conventional Scanning Electron Microscopes (SEM) do not have the resolution to image such small phases. Since the early 1990’s, a new generation of microscopes is now available on the market. These are the Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscope with a virtual secondary electron detector. The field emission gun gives a higher brightness than those obtained using conventional electron filaments allowing enough electrons to be collected to operate the microscope with incident electron energy, E0, below 5 keV with probe diameter smaller than 5 nm. At 1 keV, the electron range is 60 nm in aluminum and 10 nm in iron (computed using the CASINO program). Since the electron beam diameter is smaller than 5 nm at 1 keV, the resolution of these microscopes becomes closer to that of TEM.

Type
Low Voltage SEM Imaging and Analysis for the Biological and Materials Sciences
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Gauvin, R., Hovington, P. and Drouin, D. (1995), “Quantification of Spherical Inclusions in the Scanning Electron Microscope Using Monte Carlo Simulations", Scanning, Vol. 17, pp. 202219.10.1002/sca.4950170401CrossRefGoogle Scholar