Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-4hvwz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-28T02:32:50.699Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron Holographic Imaging of Magnetic Materials at Nanometer Scale Resolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2020

M.R. McCartney*
Affiliation:
Center for Solid State Science, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287
Get access

Extract

Traditional electron microscopy techniques for imaging magnetic microstructure include out-of-focus Fresnel or Lorentz imaging, Foucault imaging and differential phase contrast (DPC). Off-axis electron holography provides access to both the amplitude and phase of the electron wave which has passed through the sample and therefore can provide direct, quantitative information about the in-plane component of the magnetic induction. The Philips CM200-FEG microscope which was used for the holography described here is equipped with a powerful mini-lens below the specimen enabling 2nm spatial resolution and only a small residual field at the sample. The combination of high coherence and increased magnification enable quantitative mapping of magnetic induction at the nanometer scale.

Electrostatic or magnetic potentials give rise to phase shifts in the holographic interference fringes which can be quantified following reconstruction. In the presence of a magnetic field, the phase equation (for constant composition and neglecting diffraction effects) becomes:

Type
Recent Developments in Microscopy for Studying Electronic and Magnetic Materials
Copyright
Copyright © Microscopy Society of America 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Reimer, L., Transmission Electron Microscopy, Second Edition(Springer Verlag, Berlin 1989).10.1007/978-3-662-21579-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Jakubovics, J.P., in Electron Microscopy in Materials Science, Part IV, edited by Valdre, U. and Ruedl, E., (Commission of the European Communities, Brussels, 1976) p. 1303.Google Scholar
3.Chapman, J.N., Batson, P.E., Waddell, E.M. and Ferrier, R.P., Ultramicroscopy 3 (1978) 203.10.1016/S0304-3991(78)80027-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Tonomura, A., Rev. Mod. Phys. 59 (1987) 639.10.1103/RevModPhys.59.639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Tonomura, A., Electron Holography(Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1993).10.1007/978-3-662-13913-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Bonevich, J.E., et al., Phy. Rev. Lett. 70 (1993) 2952.10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.2952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Lehmann, M.and Lichte, H., in Electron Holography edited by Tonomura, A.,et al., (Elsevier,Amsterdam 1995) p. 69.Google Scholar
8.Gajdardziska-Josifovska, M.,et al., Ultramicroscopy 50 (1993) 285.10.1016/0304-3991(93)90197-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Microscopy was performed at the Center for High Resolution Electron Microscopy at ASU in collaboration with Prof. A. Berkowitz (UCSD), Dr.Farrow, R.F.C.(IBM Almaden) and Dr.Zhu, Y. (Brookhaven). Support from DOE contract No. DE- AC02-76CH00016 is gratefully acknowleged.Google Scholar