Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-19T23:34:17.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Selection of vacuum pump system for steel degassing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 June 2014

W. Burgmann
Affiliation:
Consultant in vacuum metallurgy, France and Germany. e-mail: wburgmann@burgmann-net.de
T. Gustafson
Affiliation:
Process Technology Director of GMC- Swiss Engineers, Sweden and Bulgaria; e-mail: thore.gustafson@gmail.com
J. Davené
Affiliation:
Process engineer with CLESID-Lorber, St.Chamond, France; e-mail: jean.davene@clesid.com
Get access

Abstract

Steam ejector vacuum pumps (SVPs) are mainly used on larger melt sizes up to 350 t in integrated steel plants because of the availability of steam. The use of dry operating mechanical vacuum pumps (MVPs) for steel degassing has made a tremendous step forward in the past 10 years but is still confined to melts below 150 t while its progress towards larger melt sizes is not completed. Besides the consideration of investment and operating costs there is no restriction in using any type of modern vacuum pump system for all vacuum processes and plant designs. Both systems fulfil all metallurgical requirements. Considering the significant savings in operating cost offered by MVP systems it is worth reconsidering the efforts for reducing air leaks, the use of protective gases and pressure losses between the pump set and the metallurgical reaction vessel. Both systems have made progress in energy optimising but the MVPs have a striking energy advantage. Only the overall costs should be considered, including those necessary to meet emission constraints and safety standards, and only the pressure prevailing at the reaction vessel is to be considered when comparing vacuum pump systems. Also, the means and use of dust abatement systems should be reconsidered since they offer cost savings by reducing the frequency of cleaning, less wear, little sludge handling and the significantly lower design suction capacity of SVP systems. The SVP mass flow need is to be corrected by a special coefficient before being applied to the volume conveying MVPs. Depending on the operational pressure required for the pump design, MVP systems can reach the same performance at the reaction vessel with much less mass flow capacity than that needed by a SVP system.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© EDP Sciences 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burgmann, W., Davené, J., Stahl und Eise 6 (2012) 59-66
Burgmann, W., Davené, J., CISRI 8 (2012) 81-88
Dorstewitz, F., Tembergen, D., Stahl und Eisen 133 (2013) 33-44
SMS-MEVAC, MPT Intern. 4 (2007) 44
Zemp, R., Stahel, J., Burgmann, W., Stahl und Eisen 8 (2008) 45-50
Zöllig, U., Dreifert, T., MPT Intern. 3 (2011) 98-103
Burgmann, W., Steel Times Int. 7/8 (2013) 24-30
Burgmann, W., Göhler, K., Metallurgy (Moscow) 6 (2013) 54-61
Burgmann, W., Davené, J., Laffitte, J., La metallurgia Italiana 11/12 (2013) 11-19
Heat Exchange Institute Inc, Cleveland/Ohio/USA Standards for Steam Jet Vacuum Systems, 5th edition, 2000, pp. 28-30
Bruce, S., Cheetham, V., Vacuum challenges and solutions 8 (2009) 12-13
R. Gottardi, A. Partyka, S. Miani, M, Volpe, Proc AIS Techn Pittsburgh/Pa/USA, Vol. I, 2010, pp. 1243-1252