Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-17T13:46:30.810Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cybernetic Analysis of Human Population Growth

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2018

Richard E. Blanton*
Affiliation:
Hunter College, CUNY

Extract

In my view, certain critical features of current population theory in demography, anthropology, and related fields are misleading. These anomalies have been incorporated into population theories, I argue, largely because the researchers in these fields have tended to be too specialized. Demography, a science rooted in occidental economics and sociology, is oriented toward the study of industrializing and industrialized societies, societies which are by no means representative of the entire range of human societies. Anthropologists, although they have dealt with a wider range of human societies, have tended to neglect the potential theoretical contributions of population ecology, the study of the population dynamics of nonhuman animals. The theory of human population dynamics which I offer here was developed with the value of generality and broad scope constantly in mind. The roots of this theory are in General Systems Theory, population ecology, ethnology, demography, and economics. I propose this population theory largely as a means of encouraging, within all of those sciences concerned with population matters, a new round of debate regarding existing population theories.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for American Archaeology 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Birdsell, J. B. 1968 Some predictions for the Pleistocene based upon the equilibrium systems among recent hunters and gatherers. In Man the hunter, edited by Lee, R. B. and DeVore, I., pp. 229240. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Blanton, R. E. 1972 Prehispanic settlement patterns of the Ixtapalapa peninsula region, Mexico. Pennsylvania State University Occasional Contributions to Anthropology 6.Google Scholar
Blanton, R. E. n.d. The valley of Oaxaca, Mexico, Settlement Pattern Project, 1971 and 1972 field seasons. Mimeographed paper, on file at the Department of Anthropology, Hunter College, New York.Google Scholar
Boserup, E. 1965 The conditions of agricultural growth. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Carneiro, R. L. 1970 A theory of the origin of the state. Science 169:733738.Google Scholar
Chayanov, A. V. 1966 The theory of peasant economy, Richard D. Irwin for the American Economic Association, Home wood.Google Scholar
Coontz, S. H. 1968 Population theories and the economic interpretation, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Cowgirl, D. O. 1963 Transition Theory as General Population Theory. Social Forces 41:270274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deevey, E. S. 1960 The human population. Scientific American 203(3):194204.Google Scholar
Desmond, A. 1962 How many people have ever lived on earth?. Population Bulletin 18(1):119.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. 1966 Population control in primitive groups. British Journal of Sociology 17(3):263273.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Easterlin, R. A. 1968 Population, labor force, and long swings in economic growth: the American experience. National Bureau of Economic Research, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P., and Ehrlich, A. 1972 Population, resources, environment. Second edition. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1968 The Olmec and the Valley of Oaxaca: a model for interregional interaction in Formative times. In Dumbarton Oaks Conference on the Olmecs edited by Benson, E. P., pp. 79110. Dumbarton Oaks, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Flannery, K. V. 1972 The cultural evolution of civilizations. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 3:399426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, T. R., and DeJong, G. F. (Editors) 1970 Social demography, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
Geertz, C. 1963 Agricultural involution, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, Garrett (Editor) 1969 Population, evolution, and birth control. Second edition, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Hutchinson, G. E. 1951 Copepodology for the Ornithologist. Ecology 32:571577.Google Scholar
Kasarda, J. D. 1971 Economic structure and fertility: a comparative analysis. Demography 8:307316.Google Scholar
Klein, D. R. 1968 The introduction, increase, and the crash of reindeer on St. Matthew Island. Journal of Wildlife Management 32:350367.Google Scholar
Lees, S. 1972 Irrigation, organization, and stability in complex societies. Paper presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the American Anthropological Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
Malo, D. 1951 Hawaiian antiquities. Bernice P. Bishop Museum, Special Publication 2.Google Scholar
Maruyama, M. 1963 The Second Cybernetics: deviation-amplifying mutual-causal processes. American Scientist 51:164179.Google Scholar
Marx, K. 1967 Capital, Vol.1: The process of Capitalist production, International Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
Miller, J. G. 1965 Living systems, basic concepts. Behavioral Science 10(3): 193257.Google Scholar
Park, T. D., Leslie, B. H., and Mertz, D. B. 1964 Genetic strains and competition in populations of Tribolium. Physiological Zoology 37:97162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parsons, J. R. 1971 Prehistoric settlement patterns of the Texcoco region, Mexico. University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Memoirs 3.Google Scholar
Pearl, R. 1927 The growth of populations. Quarterly Review of Biology 2:532548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petersen, W. 1969 Population. Second edition. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Polgar, S. 1971 Culture history and population dynamics. In Culture and population, edited by Polgar, S., pp. 38. Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Rappaport, R. 1967 Pigs for the ancestors. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Russell, J. C. 1958 Late Ancient and Medieval population. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 43.Google Scholar
Sahlins, M. 1972 Stone Age economics. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T., and Price, B. 1968 Mesoamerica: the evolution of a civilization. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Silliman, R. P., and Gutsell, J. S. 1958 Experimental exploitation of fish populations. Fishery Bulletin 58:215252.Google Scholar
Slobodkin, L. B. 1961 Growth and regulation of animal populations. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
Slobodkin, L. B. 1968 Toward a predictive theory of evolution. In Population Biology and Evolution, edited by Lewontin, R. C.. Syracuse University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
Smith, P. E. L., and Young, T. C. 1972 The evolution of early agriculture and culture in Greater Mesopotamia: A Trial Model. In Population growth: anthropological implications, edited by Spooner, Brian, pp. 101154. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert 1898 The principles of biology. D. Appleton, New York.Google Scholar
Spooner, B. (Editor) 1972 Population growth: anthropological implications. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Stott, D. H. 1962 Cultural and natural checks on population growth. Culture and the evolution of man, edited by Ashley-Montagu, M. F., pp. 355376. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Sussman, R. W. 1972 Child transport, family size, and increase in human population during the Neolithic. Current Anthropology 13:258259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, B. 1973 Demand for labor and population growth in Colonial Java, Human Ecology 1(3):217236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittfogel, K. A. 1957 Oriental despotism. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Wright, H. T. 1969 The administration of production in an early Mesopotamian town. University of Michigan, Museum of Anthropology, Anthropological Papers 38.Google Scholar
Wrigley, E. A. 1969 Population and history, McGraw-Hill, New York and Toronto.Google Scholar
Wynne-Edwards, V. C. 1962 Animal dispersion in relation to social behavior. Hafner, New York.Google Scholar