Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-g7rbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-01T17:51:05.184Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Professor Annas Responds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2021

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reply
Information
Medicolegal News , Volume 8 , Issue 6 , December 1980 , pp. 13 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annas, G.J. Glantz, L.H. Katz, B.F.. Informed Consent to Human Experimentation The Subject's Dilemma (Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.) (1977).Google Scholar
DHEW, Determination of the Secretary Regarding the Recommendation on Psychosurgery of the National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research, 43 Fed. Reg. 53242,53244 (Nov. 15, 1978).Google Scholar