Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-14T00:03:51.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The sequential topology on is not regular

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 September 2009

MATTHIAS SCHRÖDER
MATTHIAS SCHRÖDER*
Affiliation:
Fakultät für Informatik, Universität der Bundeswehr München, 85577 Neubiberg, Germany Email: matthias.schroeder@unibw.de
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The compact-open topology on the set of continuous functionals from the Baire space to the natural numbers is well known to be zero-dimensional. We prove that the closely related sequential topology on this set is not even regular. The sequential topology arises naturally as the topology carried by the exponential formed in various cartesian closed categories of topological spaces. Moreover, we give an example of an effectively open subset of that violates regularity. The topological properties of are known to be closely related to an open problem in Computable Analysis. We also show that the sequential topology on the space of continuous real-valued functions on a Polish space need not be regular.

Type
Paper
Information
Mathematical Structures in Computer Science , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , October 2009 , pp. 943 - 957
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asperti, A. and Longo, G. (1991) Categories, Types, and Structures: An Introduction to Category Theory for the Working Computer Scientist, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, A., Escardó, M. and Simpson, A. (2002) Comparing Functional Paradigms for Exact Real-number Computation. In: Proc. ICALP '02. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2380 488–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelking, R. (1989) General Topology, Heldermann.Google Scholar
Escardó, M., Lawson, J. and Simpson, A. (2004) Comparing Cartesian Closed Categories of (Core) Compactly Generated Spaces. Topology and its Applications 143 105–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyland, J. M. E. (1979) Filter Spaces and Continuous Functionals. Annals of Mathematical Logic 16 101–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kisyński, J. (1960) Convergence du Type L. Colloquium Mathematicum 7 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleene, S. E. (1959) Countable Functionals. In: Constructivity in Mathematics, North-Holland 81–100.Google Scholar
Kreisel, G. (1959) Interpretation of Analysis by means of Functionals of Finite Type. In: Constructivity in Mathematics, North-Holland 101–128.Google Scholar
Michael, E. (1973) On k-spaces, kR-spaces and k(X). Pacific Journal of Mathematics 47 (2)487–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normann, D. (1980) Recursion on the Countable Functionals. Springer-Verlag Lecture Notes in Mathematics 811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Normann, D. (2005) Comparing Hierarchies of Total Functionals. Logical Methods in Computer Science 1 (2:4)1–28.Google Scholar
Schröder, M. (2002) Extended Admissibility. Theoretical Computer Science 284 519–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schröder, M. (2003) Admissible Representations for Continuous Computations, Ph.D. Thesis, Fernuniversität Hagen.Google Scholar
Simpson, A. (2003) Towards a Convenient Category of Topological Domains. In: Proceedings of thirteenth ALGI Workshop, RIMS, Kyoto University.Google Scholar
Weihrauch, K. (2000) Computable Analysis, Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willard, S. (1970) General Topology, Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar