Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T01:26:23.861Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The three-dimensional inverse scattering problem for the Helmholtz equation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

B. D. Sleeman
B. D. Sleeman
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper we are concerned with solutions of the three-dimensional Helmholtz equation which are of class C2 (i.e. regular) in the exterior of a bounded domain D. In cylindrical polar coordinates (r, z, φ) such solutions satisfy the equation

in which we have dimensionalized the radial coordinate r so that the wave number is normalized to unity. If we further assume that u satisfies the Sommerfeld radiation condition

then u may be regarded as being generated by volume sources, surface sources, or point singularities, all of which are contained in D.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 73 , Issue 3 , May 1973 , pp. 477 - 488
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Boas, R. P.Entire functions (Academic Press, New York, 1954).Google Scholar
(2)Colton, D.On the inverse scattering problem for axially symmetric solutions of the Helmholtz equation. Quart. J. Math., Oxford Scr. 22 (1971), 125–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Erdélyi, A.Higher transcendental functions, vol. II (New York, McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
(4)Garabedian, P. R.Partial differential equations (New York, Wiley, 1964).Google Scholar
(5)Gilbert, R. P.On the singularities of generalised axially symmetric potentials. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 61 (1960), 171–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Hartman, P. and Wilcox, C.On solutions of the Hehnholtz equation in exterior domains. Math. Z. 75 (1961), 228–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Henrici, P.A survey of I. N. Vekua's theory of elliptic partial differential equations with analytic coefficients. Z. Agnew. Math. Phys. 8 (1957), 169–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(8)Hille, E.Analytic function theory, vol. II (Boston, Ginn and Co., 1962).Google Scholar
(9)Hochstadt, H.The functions of mathematical physics (Wiley–Interscience, 1971).Google Scholar
(10)Lewy, H.On the reflection laws of second order differential equations in two independent variables. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 65 (1959), 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(11)Miller, R. F.Singularities of two-dimensional exterior solutions of the Helmholtz equation. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 69 (1971), 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Müller, C.Radiation patterns and radiation fields. J. Rational Mech. Anal. 4 (1955), 235–246.Google Scholar
(13)Rudin, W.Principles of Mathematical Analysis (New York, McGraw-Hill, 1964).Google Scholar
(14)Titchmarsh, E. C.Theory of functions (Oxford University Press, London, 1939).Google Scholar
(15)Vekua, I. N.New Methods for solving elliptic equations (New York, Wiley, 1967).Google Scholar
(16)Weinstein, A.Generalized axially symmetric potential theory. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 59, (1953), 20–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17)Weston, V. H., Bowman, J. J. and Ar, E.On the inverse electromagnetic scattering problem. Arch. Rational Mech. Anal. 31 (1968), 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar