Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T14:50:54.497Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The structure of radiation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Edmund C. Stoner
Edmund C. Stoner
Affiliation:
Emmanuel College.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is shown that, assuming conservation of energy and momentum in individuai transitions, radiation must be regarded as propagated by linearly directed quanta. Evidence is brought forward in favour of the view that these quanta are spatially localised longitudinally as well as laterally. As these conclusions seem unavoidable, an attempt is made to see if there is any possibility of accounting for interference effects in terms of quants possessing periodic properties.

The idea that a single quantum can produce interference effects is untenable. The conception of the phase of a quant is introduced, and it is supposed that atoms may absorb a quant in a given phase provided they are in a “state” corresponding to that phase. Considering radiation emanating from a point, it is shown that a tentative explanation of interference may be obtained if the quants have a constant phase at emission, and if they give atoms at any point an impulse towards the state corresponding to their phase at the point. According as these impulses reinforce or oppose each other, bright or dark parts of a fringe System are obtained. Practically the whole nomenclature and method of the wave theory may be taken over and applied to the quant phase field surrounding an emitting source. Essentially, on this view, an explanation of interference is sought in terms of different quants, and the dark and bright parte of a fringe system are to be explained, not in terms of different numbers of quante arriving at them, but in different phase relations of quante which do arrive.

Quante are characterised by a magnetic and electric vector, whose magnitudes and directions define the state of polarisation and the phase. Electron orbite may also be regarded as characterised by two vectors in terms of which it seems as if the “state” may be specified.

The relation between transition character and type of radiation emitted is finally considered and it is shown that the evidence so far available renders plausible an explanation of interference of the kind put forward. Much further experimental work, particularly in connection with the Stark and Zeeman effects, is, however, necessary, before sufficient precision can be given to the views put forward to make them satisfying. On the other hand, it seems premature to suppose that only a formal treatment is possible of the physical phenomena involved.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , March 1925 , pp. 577 - 594
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1925

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* For a generai account of the present status of the problem see Jeans, , Report on Radiation and the Quantum Theory (2nd ed. 1924)Google Scholar, particularly Ch. VIII, and Bohr, , On the Application of the Quantum Theory to Atomic Structure, Pt I (1924)Google Scholar, particularly Ch. III, supplemented by Bohr, Kramers and Slater, , Phil. Mag. 47, 785 (1924).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* L.c. p. 80.Google Scholar

† L.c. p. 81.Google Scholar

‡ L.c. p. 82.Google Scholar

* Einstein, , Phys. Zeit. 18, 121 (1917).Google Scholar

† Cf., Bohr, l.c. p. 40.Google Scholar

‡ Breit, , Phys. Rev. 22, 313 (1923).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* Wilson, , Proc. Roy. Soc. 104, 1 (1923)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, see p. 18.

* Phil. Mag., l.c. p. 791.Google Scholar

† Skobelzyn, , Zeit. für Phys. 28, 278 (1924).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

‡ Compton, , Phys. Rev. 23 (1924).Google Scholar

* E.g. Tolman, , Phys. Rev. 23, 693 (1924)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Milne, , Phil. Mag. 47, 209 (1924).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† Thomson, , Proc. Roy. Soc. 104, 115 (1923).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

* Ornstein, and Burger, , Zeit. f. Phys. 20, 345, 351 and 21, 358 (1924).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† de Broglie, , Journ. de Phys. VI, iii, 422 (1922).Google Scholar

* See Jeans, , l.c. p. 79.Google Scholar

† Bohr, , l.c. p. 35.Google Scholar

* Cf., Bohr, l.c. p. 41.Google Scholar

* Wood, and Ellett, , Proc. Roy. Soc. 103, 396 (1923)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Phys. Rev. 24, 243 (1924).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

† See Joos, , Phys. Zeit. 25, 130 (1924).Google Scholar