Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T22:13:31.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fefferman-type metrics and the projective geometry of sprays in two dimensions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 2007

M. CRAMPIN  and
D. J. SAUNDERS
M. CRAMPIN*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematical Physics and Astronomy, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281, B–9000 Ghent, Belgium and Department of Mathematics, King's College, Strand, London WC2R 2LS. e-mail: Crampin@btinternet.com
D. J. SAUNDERS
Affiliation:
Department of Algebra and Geometry, Palacky University, 779 00 Olomouc, Czech Republic.
*
†Address for correspondence: 65 Mount Pleasant, Aspley Guise, Beds MK17 8JXUK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A spray is a second-order differential equation field on the slit tangent bundle of a differentiable manifold, which is homogeneous of degree 1 in the fibre coordinates in an appropriate sense; two sprays which are projectively equivalent have the same base-integral curves up to reparametrization. We show how, when the base manifold is two-dimensional, to construct from any projective equivalence class of sprays a conformal class of metrics on a four-dimensional manifold, of signature (2, 2); the Weyl conformal curvature of these metrics is simply related to the projective curvature of the sprays, and the geodesics of the sprays determine null geodesics of the metrics. The metrics in question have previously been obtained by Nurowski and Sparling (Classical and Quantum Gravity20 (2003) 4995–5016), by a different method involving the exploitation of a close analogy between the Cartan geometry of second-order ordinary differential equations and of three-dimensional Cauchy–Riemann structures. From this perspective the derived metrics are seen to be analoguous to those defined by Fefferman in the CR theory, and are therefore said to be of Fefferman type. Our version of the construction reveals that the Fefferman-type metrics are derivable from the scalar triple product, both directly in the flat case (which we discuss in some detail) and by a simple extension in general. There is accordingly in our formulation a very simple expression for a representative metric of the class in suitable coordinates.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 142 , Issue 3 , May 2007 , pp. 509 - 523
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Bailey, T. N., Eastwood, M. G. and Gover, A. R.. Thomas's structure bundle for conformal, projective and related structures Rocky Mountain J. Math. 24 1994 1191–1217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Cartan, E. . Sur les variétés à connexion projective Bull. Soc. Math. France 52 1924 205–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Crampin, M. and Saunders, D. J.. Cartan's concept of duality for second-order ordinary differential equations J. Geom. Phys. 54 2005 146–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Crampin, M. and Saunders, D. J.. Projective connections. J. Geom. Phys. 57 (2007), 691–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Crampin, M. and Saunders, D. J.. Path geometries and almost Grassmann structures. Adv. Stud. Pure Math. to appear. (Available at http://maphyast.ugent.be Theoretical Mechanics.)Google Scholar
[6]Douglas, J. . The general geometry of paths Ann. Math. 29 1928 143–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Dunajski, M. and West, S.. Anti-self-dual conformal structures with null Killing vectors from projective structures. Preprint DAMTP, Cambridge University (2006), (arXiv:math.DGsol; 0601419).Google Scholar
[8]Fefferman, C. . Monge-Ampère equations, the Bergman kernel, and geometry of pseudo-convex domains Ann. Math. 103 1976 359–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Fritelli, S., Kozameh, C. and Newman, E. T.Differential geometry from differential equations Comm. Math. Phys. 223 2001 383–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]LeBrun, C. and Mason, L. J.. Nonlinear gravitons, null geodesics and holomorphic discs. Preprint SUNY Stony Brook (2005), (arXiv:math.DG/0504582).Google Scholar
[11]Newman, E. T. and Nurowski, P.. Projective connections associated with second-order ODEs Classical Quantum Gravity 20 2003 2325–2335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Nurowski, P. . Differential equations and conformal structures J. Geom. Phys. 55 2005 19–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Nurowski, P. and Sparling, G. A. J.. Three-dimensional Cauchy–Riemann structures and second-order ordinary differential equations Classical Quantum Gravity 20 2003 4995–5016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Roberts, C. . The projective connections of T. Y. Thomas and J. H. C. Whitehead applied to invariant connections Diff. Geom. Appl. 5 1995 237–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Sharpe, R. W.Differential Geometry: Cartan's Generalization of Klein's Erlangen Program Springer 1997Google Scholar
[16]Shen, Z. . Differential Geometry of Spray and Finsler Spaces Kluwer 2001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Thomas, T. Y. . On the projective and equi-projective geometries of paths Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 11 1925 199–203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
[18]Thomas, T. Y. . A projective theory of affinely connected manifolds Math. Zeit. 25 1926 723–733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19]Weyl, H. . Zur Infinitesimalgeometrie: Einordnung der projektiven und der konformen Auffassung Gött. Nach. 1921 99–112Google Scholar
[20]Whitehead, J. H. C. . The representation of projective spaces Ann. Math. 32 1931 327–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Yano, K. and Ishihara, S.Tangent and Cotangent Bundles Marcel Dekker 1973.Google Scholar