Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:50:32.957Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Compensators and Cox convergence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

T. C. Brown
Affiliation:
University of Bath

Extract

In a previous paper (4), the author showed that the martingale approach to point processes may be used to derive Poisson distributional limit theorems. Here this approach is extended to Cox convergence, general increasing processes are considered, and a regularity condition needed in (4) is removed (that of calculability). In Section 3 we give examples to show the need for the various hypotheses used in the main theorem of Section 2. This theorem is applied to various (dependent) thinnings and compound-ings of point processes in Section 4.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Aldous, D. Weak convergence of stochastic processes, for processes viewed in the Stras-bourg manner. Preprint (1979).Google Scholar
(2)Aldous, D. and Eagleson, G. K.On mixing and stability of limit theorems. Ann. Probability 6 (1978), 325331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(3)Billingsley, P.Convergence of probability measures (John Wiley, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
(4)Brown, T. C.A martingale approach to the Poisson convergence of simple point processes. Ann. Probability 6 (1978), 615628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(5)Brown, T. C. Some distributional approximations for random measures. PhD thesis, University of Cambridge, 1979.Google Scholar
(6)Brown, T. C.Position dependent and stochastic thinning of point processes. Stochastic Processes and Appl. 9 (1979), 189193.Google Scholar
(7)Dellacherie, C.Capacités et processus stochastiques (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1972).Google Scholar
(8)Eagleson, G. K.Martingale convergence to mixtures of infinitely divisible laws. Ann. Probability 3 (1975), 557562.Google Scholar
(9)Feller, W.An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol. 1, 3rd edition (John Wiley, New York, 1968).Google Scholar
(10)Grigelionis, B.The characterization of stochastic processes with conditionally independent increments. Liet. Matem. Rink. 18 (1977), 7586.Google Scholar
(11)Jacod, J.Multivariate point processes: predictable projection, Radon-Nikodym derivatives, representation of martingales. Zeit. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie 31 (1975), 235253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(12)Jacod, J. and Memin, J.Sur la convergence des semimartingales vers un processus a accroissements indépendents. Séminaire Probabilités. XIV. Springer Lecture Notes in Maths, 784 (1980).Google Scholar
(13)Jagers, P. and Lindvall, T.Thinning and rare events in point processes. Zeit. Wahr-scheinlichkeitstheorie 28 (1974), 8998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(14)Kabanov, Y.Lipster, R. and Shiryayev, A.Some limit theorems for simple point processes (martingale approach). Stochastics 3 (1980), 203216.Google Scholar
(15)Kallenberg, O.Random measures (Academic Press, London, 1976).Google Scholar
(16)Kallenberg, O.On the asymptotic behaviour of line processes and systems of non-interacting particles. Zeit. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie 43 (1978), 6595.Google Scholar
(17)Lipster, R. S. and Shiryayev, A. N.Statistics of random processes. II (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978).Google Scholar
(18)Papangelou, F.The conditional intensity of general point processes and an application to line processes. Zeit. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie 28 (1974), 207226.Google Scholar
(19)Silverman, B. and Brown, T. C.Short distances, flat triangles and Poisson limits. J. Appl.Probab. 15 (1978), 815825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(20)Whitt, W. Representation and convergence of point processes on the line. Preprint (1973).Google Scholar