Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-txr5j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T00:59:03.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Asymptotic distributions of pontograms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

Miklós Csörgő  and
Lajos Horváth
Miklós Csörgő
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Carleton University
Lajos Horváth
Affiliation:
Bolyai Institute, Szeged University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Let{N(x), x ≥ 0} be a Poisson process with intensity parameter λ > 0, and introduce

When looking for the changepoint in the Land's End data, Kendall and Kendall [7] proved for all 0 < ε1 < 1 − ε2 < 1 that

where {V(s), − ∞ < s < ∞} is an Ornstein–Uhlenbeck process with covariance function exp (−|t − s|). D. G. Kendall has posed the problem of replacing ε1 and ε2 by zero or by sequences εi(n) → 0 (n → ∞) (i = 1, 2), in (1·1). In this paper we study the latter problem and also its L2 version. The proofs will be based on the following weighted approximation of Zn.

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 101 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 131 - 139
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Csörgo, M. and Horváth., L. On the distributions of the supremum of weighted quantile processes. In Technical Report Series of the Laboratory for Research in Statistics and Probability, Carleton University, Ottawa, no. 55 (1985).Google Scholar
[2]Csörgő, M. and Horváth., L. On the distributions of L 1 and L 2 norms of weighted uniform empirical and quantile processes. In Technical Report Series of the Laboratory for Research in Statistics and Probability, Carleton University, Ottawa, no. 60 (1985).Google Scholar
[3]Csörgő, M. and Horváth., L.Approximations of weighted empirical and quantile processes. Statist. Probab. Lett. 4 (1986). (In the Press.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Csörgő, M. and Révész., P.Strong Approximations in Probability and Statistics (Academic Press, 1981).Google Scholar
[5]de, A.Acosta. Invariance principles in probability for triangular arrays of B-valued random vectors and some applications. Ann. Probab. 10 (1982), 346–373.Google Scholar
[6]Feller., W.An Introduction to Probability Theory and its Applications, vol. 2 (Wiley, 1966).Google Scholar
[7]Kendall, D. G. and Kendall., W. S.Alignments in two-dimensional random sets of points. Adv. Appl. Prob. 12 (1980), 380–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8]Komlós, J., Major, P. and Tusnády., G.An approximation of partial sums of independent R.V.'s and the sample DF. I.Z. Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie verw. Gebiete 32 (1975), 111–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar