Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-gndc8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T07:48:45.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Projective representations of rotation subgroups of Weyl groups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

D. Theo
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia

Extract

By exploiting the well known spin representations of the orthogonal groups O(l), Morris [12] was able to give a unified construction of some of the projective representations of Weyl groups W(Φ) which had previously only been available by ad hoc means [5]. The principal purpose of the present paper is to give a corresponding construction for projective representations of the rotation subgroups W+(Φ) of Weyl groups. Thus we construct non-trivial central extensions of W+(Φ) via the well-known double coverings of the rotation groups SO(l). This adaptation allows us to give a unified way of obtaining the basic projective representations of W+(Φ) from those of W(Φ) determined in [12]. Hence our work is a development of the recent work of Morris, and is an extension of Schur's work on the alternative groups [15].

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Atiyah, M., Bott, R. and Shapiro, A.. Clifford modules. Topology 3 (1964), 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Bourbaki., N.Groupes et Algèbres de Lie, chap. iv–vi (Hermann, 1968).Google Scholar
[3]Carter., R. W.Conjugacy classes in the Weyl group. Compositio Math. 25 (1972), 159.Google Scholar
[4]Frame., J. S.The classes and representations of groups of 27 lines and 28 bitangents. Ann. Mat. Pura Appl. 32 (1951), 83119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Ihara, S. and Yokonuma., T.On the second cohomology groups (Schur multipliers) of finite reflection groups. J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo, 11 (1965), 155171.Google Scholar
[6]Lam., T.The Algebraic Theory of Quadratic Forma (Benjamin, 1973).Google Scholar
[7]Magnus, W., Karrass, A. and Solitar., D.Combinatorial Group Theory (Dover, 1976).Google Scholar
[8]Maxwell., G.The Schur multipliers of rotation subgroups of Coxeter groups. J. Algebra 53 (1978), 440451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Morris., A. O.The spin representations of the symmetric groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 12 (1962), 5576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Morris., A. O.Projective representations of Weyl groups. J. London Math. Soc. (2) 8 (1974), 125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Morris., A. O.Projective characters of exceptional Weyl groups. J. Algebra 29 (1974), 567–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Morris., A. O.Projective representations of reflection groups. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 32 (1976), 403–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Morris., A. O.Projective representations of reflection groups II. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 40 (1980), 553–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Read., E. W.The projective representations of the generalized symmetric group. J. Algebra 46 (1977), 102–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Schur., I.Über die Darstellung der symmetrischen und der alternierenden Gruppe durch gebrochene lineare Substitutionen. J. für Math. 139 (1911), 155250.Google Scholar
[16]Theo., D.The α-regular classes of rotation subgroups of Weyl groups. J. Algebra (to appear).Google Scholar