Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-tdptf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-15T04:57:58.786Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The penetration depth in impure superconducting tin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 October 2008

R. G. Chambers
Affiliation:
Royal Society Mond Laboratory Cambridge

Abstract

A new method is described for measuring the surface impedance of metals at low temperatures and at radio-frequencies. Using this method, the surface impedance of normal tin and the penetration depth λ in superconducting tin have been studied at about 9 Mc/s frequency as a function of impurity content. The measured surface impedances agree well with the values expected, and the penetration depths increase with impurity content, in confirmation of Pippard's observations (14) at 9400 Mc/s. The variation of λ with reduced temperature t is well represented by the equation λ/λ0 = (1 − t4)−½, in impure as well as in pure tin. The absolute value of λ found for pure tin is about 4 × 10−6 cm., significantly lower than the values previously found.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 1956

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1)Casimir, H. B. G.Physica, 's Grav., 7 (1940), 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2)Chambers, R. G.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 215 (1952), 481.Google Scholar
(3)Chambers, R. G.Physica, 's Grav., 19 (1953), 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(4)Clapp, J. K.Proc. Inst. Radio Engrs, N.Y., 36 (1948), 356.Google Scholar
(5)Daunt, J. G., Miller, A. R., Pippard, A. B. and Shoenberg, D.Phys. Rev. (2), 74 (1948), 842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6)Dingle, R. B.Physica, 's Grav., 19 (1953), 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(7)Gouriet, G. G.Wireless Engr, 27 (1950), 105.Google Scholar
(8)Laurmann, E. and Shoenberg, D.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 198 (1949), 560.Google Scholar
(9)Lock, J. M.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 208 (1951), 391.Google Scholar
(10)London, F.Superfiuids (New York, 1950).Google Scholar
(11)London, F. and London, H.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 149 (1935), 71.Google Scholar
(12)Pippard, A. B.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 191 (1947), 370.Google Scholar
(13)Pippard, A. B.Proc. ray. Soc. A, 203 (1950), 98.Google Scholar
(14)Pippard, A. B.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 216 (1953), 547.Google Scholar
(15)Pippard, A. B.Phil. Trans. A, 248 (1955), 97.Google Scholar
(16)Reuter, G. E. H. and Sondheimer, E. H.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 195 (1948), 336.Google Scholar
(17)Shoenberg, D.Proc. roy. Soc. A, 175 (1940), 49.Google Scholar
(18)Tallqvist, Hj.Comment, phys.-math., Helsingf. 6 (11) (1932).Google Scholar