Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T03:55:58.896Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A pair of non-homeomorphic product measures on the Cantor set

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2007

TIM D. AUSTIN
TIM D. AUSTIN*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, UCLA, Los Angeles CA 90095-1555, U.S.A. e-mail: timaustin@math.ucla.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For r ∈ [0, 1] let μr be the Bernoulli measure on the Cantor set given as the infinite power of the measure on {0, 1} with weights r and 1 − r. For r, s ∈ [0, 1] it is known that the measure μr is continuously reducible to μs (that is, there is a continuous map sending μr to μs) if and only if s can be written as a certain kind of polynomial in r; in this case s is said to be binomially reducible to r. In this paper we answer in the negative the following question posed by Mauldin:

Is it true that the product measures μrand μsare homeomorphic if and only if each is a continuous image of the other, or, equivalently, each of the numbersrandsis binomially reducible to the other?

Type
Research Article
Information
Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society , Volume 142 , Issue 1 , January 2007 , pp. 103 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge Philosophical Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Dougherty, R., Mauldin, R. D. and Yingst, A.. On homeomorphic product measures on the Cantor set, manuscript.Google Scholar
[2] Huang, K. J.. Algebraic numbers and topologically equivalent measures in the Cantor space. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 96 (1986), 560–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Mauldin, R. D.. Problems in topology arising from analysis. In Open Problems in Topology (van Mill, J. and Rees, G. M., eds.) (North-Holland, 1990), pp. 617–629.Google Scholar
[4] Navarro–Bermúdez, F. J.. Topologically equivalent measures in the Cantor space. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 77 (1979), 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Navarro–Bermúdez, F. J. and Oxtoby, J. C.. Four topologically equivalent measures in the Cantor space. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 104 (1988), 859–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Oxtoby, J. C.. Homeomorphic measures in metric spaces. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 24 (1970), 419–423.Google Scholar
[7] Oxtoby, J. C. and Prasad, V. S.. Homeomorphic measures in the Hilbert cube. Pacific J. Math. 77 (1978), 483–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Oxtoby, J. C. and Ulam, S. M.. Measure preserving homeomorphisms and metrical transitivity. Ann. Math. 42 (1941), 847–920.Google Scholar