Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-06T01:15:23.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Generalising a problem of Sylvester

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 January 2015

Michael De Villiers
Michael De Villiers*
Affiliation:
School of Science, Mathematics & Technology Education, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, e-mail:profmd@mweb.co.za
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Euler line of a triangle is mostly valued, not for any practical application, but purely as a beautiful, esoteric example of post-Greek geometry. Much to his surprise, however, the author recently came across the following result and theorem by Sylvester (1814-1897) in [1] that involves an interesting application of forces that relate to the Euler line (segment). This result is also mentioned in [2] without proof or reference to Sylvester.

Type
Articles
Information
The Mathematical Gazette , Volume 96 , Issue 535 , March 2012 , pp. 78 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © The Mathematical Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dörrie, H. (translated by Antin, D.), 100 Great Problems of Elementary Mathematics: their history and solution, Dover Publications, New York (1965)p.142.Google Scholar
2. Wells, D., The Penguin dictionary of curious and interesting geometry, Penguin books (1991) p. 32.Google Scholar
3. Coolidge, J. L., A treatise on the circle and the sphere, Chelsea Publishing Company, New York (1971, original 1916) pp. 53–57.Google Scholar
4. Honsberger, R., Episodes in nineteenth & twentieth century Euclidean geometry, The Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC (1995) pp. 7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Villiers, M. de, Generalising the Nagel line to circumscribed polygons by analogy and constructive defining, Pythagoras 68 (Dec 2008) pp.32–40.Google Scholar
6. Johnson, R. A., Advanced Euclidean geometry (Modern geometry), New York, Dover Publications, New York, (1960, original 1929) p. 251.Google Scholar
7. Alison, J., Statical proofs of some geometrical theorems, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society, IV (1885) pp. 58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Yaglom, I. M., Geometric transformations I, The Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar