Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-68ccn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T06:23:36.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Susceptor Geometry on Gan Growth on Si(111) with a New MOCVD Reactor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Yungeng Gao
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Condensed Matter and Surface Science Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701
Daniel A. Gulino
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Condensed Matter and Surface Science Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701
Ryan Higgins
Affiliation:
Condensed Matter and Surface Science Program, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701

Abstract

High quality GaN films on AlN buffer layers were grown on Si(111) with a new, commercial, two-injector vertical rotating disk MOCVD reactor (CVD, Inc.). It was found that the geometry of the susceptor greatly affected the structural quality of the epilayers on Si. For the original susceptor geometry, though single crystal GaN films could be obtained, the films were dark gray in appearance with a rough morphology, and the best x-ray rocking curve FWHM was 2.33°. After modifying the susceptor geometry, transparent, mirror-like single crystal GaN films were obtained with the best x-ray rocking curve FWHM being 0.24°. Photoluminescence (PL) and infrared reflectance (IR) spectra of the grown films were compared. The film growth rate was found to increase with decrease of the growth pressure. A 2-D simulation of the flow, heat transfer, and chemical species transport in the reactor showed a more symmetric flow, larger velocity gradient, and lower upward velocity with the modified susceptor, which may be the main reason for the improvement of the structural quality of the films.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Materials Research Society

I. Introduction

GaN has attracted much research interest due to its potential application in optical, high temperature, and high power devices. Although high quality GaN films have been achieved by MOCVD growth, the mechanism is still not fully understood. Factors found to affect MOCVD growth of GaN include substrate properties,[ Reference Morkoc, Strite, Gao, Lin, Sverdlov and Burns 1 ] any buffer layer and its growth conditions,[ Reference Kuznia, Khan, Olson, Kaplan and Freitas 2 ] epilayer growth temperature and pressure,[ Reference Sasaki and Matsuoka 3 ] V/III molar flow ratio,[ Reference Tchounkeu, Briot, Gil, Alexis and Aulombard 4 ] inlet flow rate and reactor configuration,[ Reference Nakamura, Harada and Seno 5 ] among others, but a careful control of these factors does not guarantee a high quality film. The growth of GaN on silicon is very difficult due to their large difference in lattice constant, crystal structure, and thermal expansion coefficient,[ Reference Martin, Sverdlov, Botchkarev, Morkoc, Smith, Tsen, Thompson and Nayfeh 6 ] yet silicon is a very attractive material since it offers the possibility of incorporating GaN devices in silicon devices. In this work, a new, commercial, two-injector, vertical rotating disk MOCVD reactor (CVD Equipment Corporation) was used to grow GaN on Si(111). After experiencing difficulties with film growth using the standard geometry, we modified it and found that the susceptor geometry greatly affected the structural quality of the films.

II. Experiment

A new, commercial MOCVD system (CVD, Inc.) was used for GaN growth. It consists of a gas delivery system, pumping system, and reaction chamber. The reaction chamber is schematically illustrated in Figure 1a. It is a two-injector, vertical, cold-wall reactor with a rotating molybdenum susceptor inductively heated by RF. The susceptor is capable of processing one wafer with a diameter of 1 inch per run. A thermocouple is placed inside a quartz shaft underneath the susceptor to monitor the growth temperature. A closed loop vacuum pumping system enables the reactor to be operated over a pressure range of 10 to 760 torr with good stability.A high vacuum loadlock is interfaced to the reactor to isolate it from the ambient environment during wafer loading and unloading operations. Figures 1(b) and (c) show the original and modified susceptor, respectively. The original, manufacturer-supplied susceptor has a diameter of 37.5 mm, including a circular central part (which has a diameter of 25.5 mm) and an outer edge of 6 mm width. The central part of the modified susceptor was unchanged from the original, but the outer edge was cut and tapered. The diameter at the base of the modified susceptor was 31.5 mm.

Figure 1. (a) schematic of the MOCVD reaction chamber. (b) original susceptor shape. (c) modified susceptor shape.

The source gases were ammonia (NH3), trimethylgallium (TMGa), and trimethylaluminum (TMA). Hydrogen was used as a carrier gas. Silicon (111) was used as the substrate, and it was cleaned in acetone, 2%HF, and UHP deionized water, then dried with N2. Prior to growth, it was heated at 1050°C under a hydrogen flow of 2 slpm for 5 min. A total inlet gas flow rate of 1.0 slm was used. The inlet flow distribution was 0.4 slpm H2, 0.3 slpm NH3, and 0.3 slpm H2 to push the TMA or TMG. The carrier gas flow rate through the TMA bubbler (28°C) or TMG bubbler (−10°C ) was 1 sccm. The calculated V/III molar flow ratio was 4390. An AlN buffer layer with a thickness of around 100 nm was grown at 1050ºC.[ Reference Watanabe, Takcuchi, Hirosawa, Amano, Hiramatsu and Akasaki 7 ] The GaN epilayer was grown at 1000°C for 45 minutes. Four samples were grown under the above conditions, but with differing susceptor geometry, growth pressure, or susceptor rotation rate as shown in Table I. Sample 1 was the best of the samples deposited using the original susceptor.

Table I. Sample growth conditions.

sample 1 sample 2 sample 3 sample 4
susceptor shape original modified modified modified
pressure (torr) 76 10 10 76
spin rate (rpm) 60 150 60 150

X-ray diffraction (XRD), Photoluminescence (PL), and Infrared Reflectance (IR) were used to characterize the deposited films. XRD was performed with a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer with a wide angle automated goniometer and computer-based data acquisition and analysis system. IR data was collected on a Perkin-Elmer Spectrum 2000 spectrometer using unpolarized light with a reflectance angle of 0° from the normal. A gold mirror was used as the reference. PL emission at 9.5K was measured. A He-Cd laser beam (325 nm, 9 mw) was used as the excitation source. The optical signal was detected by Princeton Instruments back-illuminated CCD camera model TEA-CCD-512 TK with a UV/AR coating and controlled by a computer. Commercial CFD software (FLUENT) was used to characterize the fluid dynamics in the reactor.

III. Results

The appearance of sample 1 was rough and dark gray, while samples 2 through 4 appeared transparent and mirror-like.

3.1 XRD Results

Theta-2 theta scans of the samples showed that, in addition to Si reflections, only four other reflections were detectable, i.e. GaN (0002), AlN (0002), GaN (0004), and AlN (0004). This showed that the epilayers were single crystal and in the wurtzite phase. Figure 2 is the X-ray rocking curve on the GaN (0002) reflection. The FWHM of samples 1 to 4 were 2.33°, 0.36°, 0.40°, and 0.24°, respectively (shown in order 1, 3, 2, 4 in the figure with curves for samples 1 and 4 labeled), showing that the structural quality of the GaN films was much improved using the modified susceptor.

Figure 2. X-ray rocking curves on the GaN (0002) reflection. The curves for samples 1 and 4 are labeled.

3.2 PL Results

Figure 3 shows the photoluminescence (PL) spectra of the samples. A very strong near band edge emission was observed at 358.5 nm on samples 1 and 2 and at 356.5 nm on sample 3. The FWHM of these peaks were 61, 62, and 59 meV, respectively. Two additional peaks at 378 nm and 388 nm were also observed on these samples. Sample 4 showed a very weak near band edge emission but a very strong yellow luminescence, which is surprising considering that the X-ray rocking curve of this sample was the narrowest.

Figure 3. Photoluminescence spectra of the samples.

3.3 IR Results

From the number of interference fringes that occurred between two frequencies of the IR transmittance spectra as seen in Figure 4, we calculated the thickness of the films,[ Reference Harrick 8 ] which were 1.12, 1.27, 1.32, and 0.95 µm, respectively, for samples 1 to 4. It was interesting to note the thickness (growth rate) differences among samples 2 to 4. The growth rates under different susceptor spin rates (60 rpm vs. 150 rpm) were almost the same, while there was a significant difference among the growth rates under different growth pressures, and the growth rate decreased with increasing pressure. This result was also confirmed by the thickness of sample 1, which was thinner than samples 2 or 3. From Figure 4 we can also see that the interference fringes of sample 1 attenuate quickly at higher frequencies, which indicates the inferior quality of the film. Figure 5 shows the IR absorbance spectra of the films. A strong, sharp LO phonon mode in wurtzite GaN is observed at 735 cm−1 on sample 4, which further confirms both the high quality of the film and the x-ray rocking curve results. The LO phonon mode was also observed on sample 2 at 738 cm−1. The phonon mode of sample 1 is shifted to a higher frequency of 743 cm−1. The LO phonon mode of AlN was also observed at around 882 cm−1. No GaN or AlN LO phonon mode was observed on sample 3; the reason for this is not clear.

Figure 4. IR transmittance spectra.

Figure 5. IR absorbance spectra.

3.4 Reactor Simulation Results

The fluid dynamics in the reactor with the two different susceptors was simulated using a 2-D model. The model consisted of a numerical solution of the Navier-Stokes equations coupled with heat transfer and mass transport of chemical species using FLUENT software. The effects of variable gas properties and buoyancy was included, but did not include the rotation of susceptor and chemical reactions. A detailed 3-D simulation with susceptor rotation is being conducted and the results will be reported later. Figures 6 and 7 show the vertical velocity contour in the reactor with the only difference being susceptor geometry. From the figures, the following differences are noted: (1) the velocity distribution above the modified susceptor is more symmetric, and (2) the velocity gradient is larger above the modified susceptor. The model also indicates that the upward velocity above the original susceptor is more than twice that of the modified susceptor. (This is not discernable from the Figures.) The more symmetric flow, larger velocity gradient, and lower upward velocity may be the primary reasons for the improvement of the structural quality of the films.

Figure 6. Vertical velocity contours for the original susceptor model.

Figure 7. Vertical velocity contours for the modified susceptor model.

IV. Conclusions

The effect of susceptor geometry on the growth of GaN on silicon substrate using a new MOCVD system was studied. A modified susceptor was found to change the fluid dynamics in the reactor, resulting in a gas flow that is more symmetric, has a larger gradient, and has a weaker recirculation flow over the susceptor. The structural quality of films grown on the modified susceptor was much improved regardless of the susceptor rotation rate and growth pressure. Combining the PL and IR results, high structural and optical quality films could be obtained at 10 torr and 150 rpm with the modified susceptor.

Acknowledgments

Partial support for this work under grant BMDO-DURISP N00014-96-0782 is gratefully acknowledged. The authors wish to thank T. Lin, W. Jadwisienczak, H. Richardson, and B. Mehta at Ohio University for their help with both film and flow characterization.

Footnotes

MRS Internet J. Nitride Semicon. Res. 4S1, G3.53(1999)

References

Morkoc, H., Strite, S., Gao, G. B., Lin, M. E., Sverdlov, B., and Burns, M., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 1363 (1994).Google Scholar
Kuznia, J. N., Khan, M. A., Olson, D. T., Kaplan, R., and Freitas, J., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 4700 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasaki, T., and Matsuoka, T., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 193 (1995).Google Scholar
Tchounkeu, M., Briot, O., Gil, B., Alexis, J. P., and Aulombard, R. L., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 352 (1996).Google Scholar
Nakamura, S., Harada, Y., and Seno, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 2021 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, G. A., Sverdlov, B. N., Botchkarev, A., Morkoc, H., Smith, D. J., Tsen, S.-C. Y., Thompson, W. H., Nayfeh, M. H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 67, vol. 395 (1996).Google Scholar
Watanabe, A., Takcuchi, T., Hirosawa, K., Amano, H., Hiramatsu, K., and Akasaki, I., J. Crystal Growth 128, 391 (1993).Google Scholar
Harrick, N. J., Appl. Opt. 10, 2344 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. (a) schematic of the MOCVD reaction chamber. (b) original susceptor shape. (c) modified susceptor shape.

Figure 1

Table I. Sample growth conditions.

Figure 2

Figure 2. X-ray rocking curves on the GaN (0002) reflection. The curves for samples 1 and 4 are labeled.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Photoluminescence spectra of the samples.

Figure 4

Figure 4. IR transmittance spectra.

Figure 5

Figure 5. IR absorbance spectra.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Vertical velocity contours for the original susceptor model.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Vertical velocity contours for the modified susceptor model.