Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-r5zm4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-17T18:33:59.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seahorse Tagging Project, Studland Bay, Dorset, UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2010

N. Garrick-Maidment*
Affiliation:
The Seahorse Trust, Escot Park, Ottery St Mary, Honiton, Devon EX11 1LU, UK
S. Trewhella
Affiliation:
Purbeck Marine Wildlife Reserve, Kimmeridge, Dorset BH20 5AR, UK
J. Hatcher
Affiliation:
Purbeck Marine Wildlife Reserve, Kimmeridge, Dorset BH20 5AR, UK
K.J. Collins
Affiliation:
School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
J.J. Mallinson
Affiliation:
School of Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, National Oceanography Centre, Southampton SO14 3ZH, UK
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: N. Garrick-Maidment, The Seahorse Trust St Mary, Escot Park, Ottery, Honiton, Devon EX11 1LU, UK email: info@theseahorsetrust.org
Get access

Abstract

Studland Bay contains an extensive seagrass (Zostera marina) bed and two species of seahorse: spiny (Hippocampus guttulatus) and short snouted (H. hippocampus). All are protected under UK and international legislation. Five H. guttulatus have been tagged and all re-sighted several times within the seagrass bed. Home ranges of 30–400m2 were found. The three tagged males have all been observed to be pregnant throughout the summer months suggesting up to five broods per year. On one occasion the courtship display was recorded. This study has demonstrated the value of volunteer divers in monitoring which would not have been so successful without them. This project arose from concerns over negative impacts of boat anchoring and mooring on the seagrass habitat. It is hoped that the insights gained into site fidelity, territory size and breeding ecology of the seahorses will contribute to management plans for this unique site.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bos, A.R., Bouma, T.J., de Kort, G.L.J. and van Katwijk, M. (2007) Ecosystem engineering by annual intertidal seagrass beds: sediment accretion and modification. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 74, 344348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carcupino, M., Baldacci, A., Mazzini, M. and Franzoi, P. (2002) Functional significance of the male brood pouch in the reproductive strategies of pipefishes and seahorses: a morphological and ultrastructural comparative study on three anatomically different pouches. Journal of Fish Biology 61, 14651480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ceccherelli, G. and Campo, D. (2002) Experimental evaluation of anchor damage on Posidonia oceanica L. (Delile). Biologia Marina Mediterranea 9, 672673.Google Scholar
Collins, K.J. and Baldock, B. (2007) Use of diving computers in brittlestar surveys. Underwater Technology 27, 115118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, K.J., Mallinson, J.J. and Suonpaa, A. (in press) Seagrass and seahorses, Studland Bay, Dorset, UK. Underwater Technology.Google Scholar
Curtis, J., Moreau, M.-A., Marsden, D., Bell, E., Martin-Smith, K., Samoilys, M. and Vincent, A. (2004) Underwater visual census for seahorse population assessments. Project Seahorse Technical Report No. 8, Version 1.0. Project Seahorse, Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 28 pp.Google Scholar
Curtis, J.M.R. (2007) Validation of a method for estimating realized annual fecundity in a multiple spawner, the long-snouted seahorse (Hippocampus guttulatus), using underwater visual census. Fishery Bulletin 105, 327336.Google Scholar
Curtis, J.M.R. and Vincent, A.C.J. (2006) Life history of an unusual marine fish: survival, growth and movement patterns of Hippocampus guttulatus Cuvier 1829. Journal of Fish Biology 68, 707733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, S.J. and Vincent, A.C.J. (2004) Life history and ecology of seahorses: implications for conservation and management. Journal of Fish Biology 65, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrick-Maidment, N. (1998) A note on the status of indigenous species of sea horse. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 78, 691692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrick-Maidment, N. (2007) British Seahorse Survey 2007. Escot: The Seahorse Trust, 26 pp.Google Scholar
ICES (2003) Report of the Working Group on Fish Ecology, 3–7 March 2003. ICES Council Meeting Documents, Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Koldewey, H. (2005) Syngnathid husbandry in public aquariums. Project Seahorse, Zoological Society of London, 137 pp.Google Scholar
Lipton, A.P. and Thangaraj, M. (2007) Evaluation of a simple tagging method to monitor the growth of endangered species of seahorse. Current Science 92, 16311632.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. and Bull, C. (2005) Potential techniques for marking and tagging seahorses. Project Seahorse Technical Report No. 7, Version 1.0. Fisheries Centre, University of British Columbia, 27 pp.Google Scholar
Pinnegar, J.K., Stelzenmuller, V., Van der Kooij, J., Engelhard, G.H., Garrick-Maidment, N. and Righton, D.A. (2008) Occurrence of the short-snouted seahorse Hippocampus hippocampus in the central North Sea. Cybium 32, 343346.Google Scholar
Widdows, J., Pope, N.D., Brinsley, M.D., Asmus, H. and Asmus, R.M. (2008) Effects of seagrass beds (Zostera noltii and Z. marina) on near-bed hydrodynamics and sediment resuspension. Marine Ecology Progress Series 358, 125136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar