Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-cnmwb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-20T09:58:22.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Innovations in Public and Non-profit Sector Organizations in China

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2015

G. Zhiyong Lan
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, USA Renmin University, China
Joseph Galaskiewicz
Affiliation:
University of Arizona, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

This article provides background information on public and non-profit sector innovation in the past thirty years in the West as well as in China. We summarized and commented on the articles in this issue, which document cases of public and non-profit sector innovation in China and theorize their significance. These cases tell vivid stones about how Chinese organizations innovate and also point out the importance of the role of government in initiating or constraining these innovations. We find, through the review of these studies, that China's public and non-profit sector organization innovation experiences carry some important messages about the unique features of China's public and non-profit organizations that should not be ignored while studying changes in China.

Type
From the Guest Editors
Copyright
Copyright © International Association for Chinese Management Research 2012

References

Acosta, R. 2012. Advocacy networks through a multidisciplinary lens: Implications for research agendas. Voluntas, 23(1): 156181.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C. 2006. The civil sphere. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arrillaga-Andreessen, L. 2012. Giving 2.0: Transform your giving and our world. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
Barman, E. 2006. Contesting communities: The transformation of workplace charity, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barman, E. 2007. An instiuuional approach to donor control: From dyadic ties to a field-level analysis. American Journal of Sociology, 112(5): 14161457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, T. 2003. Certifying forests and factories: States, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields. Politics and Society, 31(3): 433464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, T. 2007. Institutional emergence in an era of globalization: Tbe rise of transnational private regulation of labor and environmental condition. American Journal of Sociology, 113(2): 297351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. (Eds.). 2008. NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. 1987. All organiza Hons are public: Bridging public and private organizational theories. Washington DC: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. 2002. Public-value failure: When efficient markets may not do. Public Administration Review, 62(2): 145161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busky, D. F. 2000. Democratic socialism: A global survey. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc. Google Scholar
Chaves, M.; Stephens, L., & Galaskiewicz, J. 2004. Does governmental funding suppress nonprofits' political activity? American Sociological Review, 69(2): 292316.Google Scholar
Defourny, J., & Kim, S.-Y. 2011. Emerging models of social enterprise in eastern Asia: A cross-country analysis. Social Enterprise Journal, 7(1): 86111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. 2012. Conceptions of social enterprise in Europe: A comparative perspective with the United States. In Gidron, B. & Hasenfeld, Z. (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective: 7190. New York: Pelgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dekker, P. 2009. Civicness: From civil society to civic services? Voluntas, 20(3): 220238.Google Scholar
Dollinger, M. J., Li, X., & Mooney, C. H. 2010. Extending the resource-based view to the mega-event: Entrepreneurial rents and innovation. Management and Organization Review, 6(2): 195218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earl, J., & Kimport, K. 2011. Digitally enabled social change; Activism in the internet age, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ebrahim, A. 2003. NGOs and organizational change; Discourse, reporting, and learning. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eikenberry, A. M. 2006. Giving circles: Growing grassroots philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(3): 517532.Google Scholar
Galaskiewicz, J., & Barringer, S. N. 2012. Social enterprises and social categories. In Gidron, B. & Hasenfeld, Z. (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective: 4770. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, S., & Eggcrs, W. D. 2004. Governing by network. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hodgkinson, V. A., Nelson, K. E., & Sivak, E. D. Jr. 2002. Individual giving and volunteering. In Salamon, L. M. (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America: 387420. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Hood, C. 1991. A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1): 319.Google Scholar
Hsu, C. L. 2008. ‘Rehabilitating charity’ in China: The case of project hope and the rise of nonprofit organizations. Journal of Civil Society, 4(2): 8196.Google Scholar
Hsu, C. L. 2010. Beyond civil society: An organizational perspective on state-NGO relations in the People's Republic of China. Journal of Civil Society, 6(3): 259277.Google Scholar
Karnani, A. 2011. Microfinance needs regulation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1): 4853.Google Scholar
Keck, M. E., & Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kerlin, J. A. 2012. Defining social enterprise across diilerent contexts: A conceptual framework based on institutional factors. In Gidron, B. & Hasenfeld, Z. (Eds.), Social enterprises: An organizational perspective: 91117. New York: Pelgrave/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kettl, D. F. 2000. The transformation of governance: Globalization, devolution, and the role of government. Public Administration Review, 60(6): 488495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kojima, K., Choe, J.-Y., Ohtomo, T., & Tsujinaka, Y. 2012. The corporate system and social organizations in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(3): 609628.Google Scholar
Lan, Z. 1999. The 1998 administrative reform in China: Issues, challenges, and prospects. The Asian Journal of Public Administration, 21(1): 2954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lan, Z., & Rosenbloom, D. 1992. Public administration in transition. Public Administration Review, 52(6): 57.Google Scholar
Li, J. 2012. Xinhua news people's net.Google Scholar
Ma, Q. 2006. Non-governmental organizations in contemporary China: Paving the way to civil society? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marwell, N. P. 2007. Bargaining for Brooklyn; Community organizations in the entrepreneurial city. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merget, A. E. 2003. Donald C. Stone lecture. Public Administration Review 63(4): 390395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milward, H. B., & Provan, K. G. 2000. Governing the hollow state. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(2): 359379.Google Scholar
Moody, M. 2008. Building a culture: The construction and evolution of venture philanthropy as a new organizational field. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly; 37(2): 324352.Google Scholar
Mosley, J. E. 2012. Keeping the lights on: How government funding concerns drive the advocacy agendas of nonprofit homeless service providers. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4): 841866.Google Scholar
Neshkova, M. I., & Kostadinova, T. 2012. The effectiveness of administrative reform in new democracies. Public Administration Review, 72(3): 324333.Google Scholar
Pei, M. 2002. China's governing crisis. Foreign Affairs, 81(5): 118.Google Scholar
Pekkanen, R. 2006. Japan's dual civil society: Members without advocates. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Perry, J., & Rainey, H. 1988. The public-private distinction in organization theory: A critique and research strategy. Academy of Management Review, 13(2): 182201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, W. W., & Owen-Smith, J. 1998. Universities as creators and retailers of intellectual property: Life-sciences research and commercial development. In Weisbrod, B. A. (Ed.), To profit or not to profit: The commercial transformation of the nonprofit sector; 169193. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proust, E. 1997. Implementing the contract state. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 56(3): 132134.Google Scholar
Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. 2008. Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2): 229 252.Google Scholar
Provan, K. G., & Milward, H. B. 1995. A preliminary theory of interorganizational network effectiveness: A comparative study of four community mental health systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(1): 133.Google Scholar
Rangan, V. K., Chu, M., & Petkoski, D. 2011. Segmenting the base of the pyramid. Harvard Business Review, 89(6): 113117.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M. 2012. The resilient sector: The future of nonprofit America. In Salamon, L. (Ed.), The state of nonprofit America: 386. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. 1998. Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. Voluntas, 9(3): 213247.Google Scholar
Savas, E. S. 1987. Privatization: The key to better government. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers.Google Scholar
Schick, A. 1998. Why most developing countries should not try New Zealand's reforms. The World Bank Research Observer, 13(1): 123131.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C. 1974. Still the century of corporatism? The Review of Politics, 36(1): 85131.Google Scholar
Schwartz, F. J., & Pharr, S. J. (Eds.). 2003. The state of civil society in Japan. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schweitzer, C. 2000. Building on new foundations. Association Management, (Oct): 2839.Google Scholar
Simo, G., & Bies, A. 2007. The role of nonprofits in disaster response: An expanded model of cross-sector collaboration. Public Administration Review, 67(1): 125142.Google Scholar
Spires, A.J. 2011. Contingent symbiosis and civil society in an authoritarian state: Understanding the survival of China's grassroots NGOs. American Journal of Sociology, 117(1): 145.Google Scholar
Unger, J. (Ed.). 2008. Associations and the Chinese state: Contested spaces. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Unger, J., & Chan, A. 2008. Associations in a bind: The emergence of political corporatism. In Unger, J. (Ed.), Associations and the Chinese state: Contested spaces: 4868. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
Wang, F., Yin, H., & Zhou, Z. 2012. The adoption of bottom-up governance in China's homeowner associations. Management and Organization Review, 8(3): 559583.Google Scholar
Wang, M. 2012. Managing HIV/AIDS: Yunnan's government-driven, multi-sector partnership model. Management and Organiza Hon Review, 8(3): 535557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y., Wu, W., & Wang, X. 2008. China's 30 year administrative reform. People's Net-Theory Channel.Google Scholar
Werlin, H. H. 2003. Poor nations, rich nations: A theory of governance. Public Administration Review 63(3): 329339.Google Scholar
Yang, L. 2012. Building a knowledge-driven society: Scholar participation and governance in large public works projects. Management and Organization Review, 8(3): 585607.Google Scholar
Young, D. R. 2009. Alternative perspectives on social enterprise. In Cordes, J.J. & Steuerle, E. (Eds.), Nonprofits and business: 2146. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Y. 2012. Institutional sources of reform: The diffusion of land banking systems in China. Management and Organization Review, 8(3): 507533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, M. 2012. The social enterprise emerges in China. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(2): 3035.Google Scholar