Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-vbn2q Total loading time: 0.879 Render date: 2021-08-01T13:38:45.214Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

UNANCHORED EXPECTATIONS: SELF-REINFORCING LIQUIDITY TRAPS AND MULTIPLE STEADY STATES

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2019

Joep Lustenhouwer
Affiliation:
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg
Corresponding
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We study a New Keynesian model with bounded rationality, where agents choose their expectations heterogeneously from a discrete choice set. The range of their set of possible expectation values can be interpreted as the anchoring of expectations. In the model, multiple locally stable steady states can arise that reflect coordination on particular expectation values. Moreover, bad shocks to the economy can trigger a self-reinforcing wave of pessimism, where the zero lower bound on the nominal interest rate becomes binding, and agents coordinate on a locally stable liquidity trap steady state. When we let the anchoring of expectations evolve endogenously, it turns out that the anchoring of expectations at the time the bad shocks hit the economy is crucial in determining whether the economy can recover from the liquidity trap. Finally, we find that a higher inflation target makes it less likely that self-reinforcing liquidity traps arise.

Type
Articles
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2019

Footnotes

The author gratefully acknowledges the financial support of NWO (Dutch Science Foundation) Project No. 40614011 “Monetary and Fiscal Policy under Bounded Rationality and Heterogeneous Expectations”.

References

Agliari, A., Massaro, D., Pecora, N. and Spelta, A. (2017) Inflation targeting, recursive inattentiveness, and heterogeneous beliefs. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 49(7), 15871619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agliari, A., Pecora, N. and Spelta, A. (2015) Coexistence of equilibria in a new keynesian model with heterogeneous beliefs. Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 79, 8395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrade, P., Crump, R. K., Eusepi, S., Moench, E., et al. (2013) Noisy information and fundamental disagreement. Staff Reports, Federal Reserve Bank of New York 655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anufriev, M., Assenza, T., Hommes, C. and Massaro, D. (2013) Interest rate rules and macroeconomic stability under heterogeneous expectations. Macroeconomic Dynamics 17(8), 15741604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arifovic, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M. (2018) Learning to live in a liquidity trap. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 89, 120136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aruoba, Borağan, S., Cuba-Borda, P. and Schorfheide, F. (2017) Macroeconomic dynamics near the zlb: A tale of two countries. The Review of Economic Studies 85(1), 87118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assenza, T., Heemeijer, P., Hommes, C. and Massaro, D. (2014) Managing self-organization of expectations through monetary policy: A macro experiment, Technical report, CeNDEF Working Paper, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Baker, M. (1992) Digit preference in CPS unemployment data. Economics Letters 39(1), 117121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, L. M. (2013) The case for four percent inflation. Central Bank Review 13(2), 17.Google Scholar
Benhabib, J., Evans, G. W. and Honkapohja, S. (2014) Liquidity traps and expectation dynamics: Fiscal stimulus or fiscal austerity? Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 45, 220238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M. (2001a) Monetary policy and multiple equilibria. American Economic Review 91(1), 167186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, J., Schmitt-Grohé, S. and Uribe, M. (2001b) The perils of taylor rules. Journal of Economic Theory 96(1), 4069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blinder, A. S., Ehrmann, M., Fratzscher, M., De Haan, J. and Jansen, D.-J. (2008) Central bank communication and monetary policy: A survey of theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Literature 46(4), 910945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, W. A. and McGough, B. (2009) A new keynesian model with heterogeneous expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 33(5), 10361051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Branch, W. A. and McGough, B. (2010) Dynamic predictor selection in a new keynesian model with heterogeneous expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 34(8), 14921508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, William A and Cars, H Hommes (1997) A rational route to randomness. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 65, 10591095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, C. D. (2003) Macroeconomic expectations of households and professional forecasters. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 118(1), 269298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, S. J. and Milani, F. (2019) The misspecification of expectations in new keynesian models: A DSGE-VAR approach. Macroeconomic Dynamics 23(3), 9741007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornea-Madeira, A., Hommes, C. and Massaro, D. (2019) Behavioral heterogeneity in US inflation dynamics. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 37(2), 288300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, Richard (2010), Inflation expectations and empirical tests: Theoretical models and empirical tests. In: Inflation Expectations, pp. 5279. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Grauwe, P. (2011) Animal spirits and monetary policy. Economic Theory 47(2–3), 423457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Grauwe, P. and Ji, Y. (2019) Inflation targets and the zero lower bound in a behavioral macroeconomic model. Economica 86(342), 262299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Di Bartolomeo, G., Di Pietro, M. and Giannini, B. (2016) Optimal monetary policy in a new keynesian model with heterogeneous expectations. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 73, 373387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dincer, N. N. and Eichengreen, B. (2014) Central bank transparency and independence: Updates and new measures. International Journal of Central Banking 10(1), 189259.Google Scholar
Edouard, L. and Senthilselvan, A. (1997) Observer error and birthweight: Digit preference in recording. Public Health 111(2), 7779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eusepi, S. (2010) Central bank communication and the liquidity trap. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 42(2-3), 373397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. W., Guse, E. and Honkapohja, S. (2008) Liquidity traps, learning and stagnation. European Economic Review 52(8), 14381463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, G. W., Honkapohja, S. and Mitra, K. (2016) Expectations, stagnation and fiscal policy. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper 25.Google Scholar
Gasteiger, E. (2014) Heterogeneous expectations, optimal monetary policy, and the merit of policy inertia. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 46(7), 15351554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guse, E. A. and Carton, J. (2014) Replicator dynamic learning in Muth’s model of price movements. Macroeconomic Dynamics 18(3), 573592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hommes, C. H. and Lustenhouwer, J. (2019a) Inflation targeting and liquidity traps under endogenous credibility. Journal of Monetary Economics, forthcoming. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hommes, C. H. and Lustenhouwer, J. (2019b) Managing unanchored, heterogeneous expectations and liquidity traps. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 101, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurz, M., Piccillo, G. and Wu, H. (2013) Modeling diverse expectations in an aggregated new keynesian model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37(8), 14031433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustenhouwer, J. (2017) Monetary and fiscal policy under bounded rationality and heterogeneous expectations, Technical report, Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Mankiw, N. G., Reis, R. and Wolfers, J. (2003) Disagreement about inflation expectations, Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manski, C. F., McFadden, D., et al. (1981) Structural Analysis of Discrete Data with Econometric Applications. Mit Press Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Massaro, D. (2013) Heterogeneous expectations in monetary DSGE models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 37(3), 680692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mertens, K. R. S. M. and Ravn, M. O. (2014) Fiscal policy in an expectations-driven liquidity trap. Review of Economic Studies 81(4), 16371667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pecora, N. and Spelta, A. (2017) Managing monetary policy in a new keynesian model with many beliefs types. Economics Letters 150, 5358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfajfar, D. and Žakelj, B. (2018) Inflation expectations and monetary policy design: Evidence from the laboratory. Macroeconomic Dynamics 22(4), 10351075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svensson, L. E. O. (2009) Transparency under flexible inflation targeting: Experiences and challenges. No. 7213. CEPR Discussion Papers.Google Scholar
Woodford, M. (1999) Optimal monetary policy inertia. The Manchester School 67(s1), 135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodford, M. (2003) Interest and Prices: Foundations of a Theory of Monetary Policy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Woodford, M. (2005) Central bank communication and policy effectiveness, Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
You have Access
Open access
1
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

UNANCHORED EXPECTATIONS: SELF-REINFORCING LIQUIDITY TRAPS AND MULTIPLE STEADY STATES
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

UNANCHORED EXPECTATIONS: SELF-REINFORCING LIQUIDITY TRAPS AND MULTIPLE STEADY STATES
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

UNANCHORED EXPECTATIONS: SELF-REINFORCING LIQUIDITY TRAPS AND MULTIPLE STEADY STATES
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *