Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-20T17:32:58.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

THE DEMAND FOR LIQUID ASSETS: EVIDENCE FROM THE MINFLEX LAURENT DEMAND SYSTEM WITH CONDITIONALLY HETEROSKEDASTIC ERRORS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 March 2018

Dongfeng Chang
Affiliation:
Shandong University
Apostolos Serletis*
Affiliation:
University of Calgary
*
Address correspondence to: Apostolos Serletis, Department of Economics, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta T2N 1N4, Canada; e-mail: Serletis@ucalgary.ca; Website: http://econ.ucalgary.ca/serletis.htm

Abstract

We investigate the demand for money and the degree of substitutability among monetary assets in the United States using the generalized Leontief and the Minflex Laurent (ML) models as suggested by Serletis and Shahmoradi (2007). In doing so, we merge the demand systems literature with the recent financial econometrics literature, relaxing the homoskedasticity assumption and instead assuming that the covariance matrix of the errors of flexible demand systems is time-varying. We also pay explicit attention to theoretical regularity, treating the curvature property as a maintained hypothesis. Our findings indicate that only the curvature constrained ML model with a Baba, Engle, Kraft, and Kroner (BEKK) specification for the conditional covariance matrix is able to generate inference consistent with theoretical regularity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This paper is based on Chapter 4 of Dongfeng Chang's Ph.D. dissertation at the University of Calgary. We would like to thank Bill Barnett and the following members of Dongfeng's dissertation committee: Herbert Emery, Daniel Gordon, Ron Kneebone, David Walls, and Philip Chang.

References

REFERENCES

Allen, R. G. D. (1938) Mathematical Analysis for Economists. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A. (1978) The user cost of money. Economics Letters 1, 145149.10.1016/0165-1765(78)90051-4Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A. (1980) Economic monetary aggregates: An application of aggregation and index number theory. Journal of Econometrics 14, 1148.10.1016/0304-4076(80)90070-6Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A. (1983) New indices of money supply and the flexible Laurent demand system. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1, 723.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A. (2002) Tastes and technology: Curvature is not sufficient for regularity. Journal of Econometrics 108, 199202.10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00131-2Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A. (2016) Friedman and Divisia monetary measures. In Cord, R. and Hammond, D. (eds.), Milton Friedman: Contributions to Economics and Public Policy, pp. 265291. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198704324.003.0016Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A. and Lee, Y. W. (1985) The global properties of the minflex Laurent, generalized Leontief, and translog flexible functional forms. Econometrica 53, 14211437.10.2307/1913216Google Scholar
Barnett, W. A., Liu, J., Mattson, R. S., and van den Noort, J. (2013) The new CFS Divisia monetary aggregates: Design, construction, and data sources. Open Economies Review 24, 101124.10.1007/s11079-012-9257-1Google Scholar
Barten, A. P. (1969) Maximum likelihood estimation of a complete system of demand equations. European Economic Review 1, 773.10.1016/0014-2921(69)90017-8Google Scholar
Blackorby, C., Primont, D., and Russell, R. R. (1978) Duality, Separability, and Functional Structure. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Blackorby, C., Primont, D., and Russell, R. R. (1989) Will the real elasticity of substitution please stand up? American Economic Review 79, 882888.Google Scholar
Diewert, W. E. (1971) An application of the Shephard duality theorem: A generalized Leontief production function. Journal of Political Economy 79, 481507.10.1086/259764Google Scholar
Diewert, W. E. (1973) Functional forms for profit and transformation functions. Journal of Economic Theory 6, 284316.10.1016/0022-0531(73)90051-3Google Scholar
Diewert, W. E. (1974) Applications of duality theory. In Intriligator, M. and Kendrick, D. (eds.), Frontiers in Quantitive Economics, pp. 106171. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Drake, L. and Fleissig, A. R. (2004) Semi-nonparametric estimates of currency substitution: The demand for sterling in Europe. Review of International Economics 12, 374394.10.1111/j.1467-9396.2004.00456.xGoogle Scholar
Drake, L. and Fleissig, A. R. (2010) Substitution between monetary assets and consumer goods: New evidence on the monetary transmission mechanism. Journal of Banking and Finance 34, 28112821.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.06.002Google Scholar
Drake, L., Fleissig, A. R., and Mullineaux, A. (1999) Are ‘risky’ assets substitutes for ‘monetary assets’? Evidence from an AIM demand system. Economic Inquiry 37, 510526.10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01445.xGoogle Scholar
Drake, L., Fleissig, A. R., and Swofford, J. L. (2003) A semi-nonparametric approach to the demand for U.K. monetary assets. Economica 70, 99120.10.1111/1468-0335.d01-49Google Scholar
Engle, R. F. and Kroner, K. F. (1995) Multivariate simultaneous generalized ARCH. Econometric Theory 11, 122150.10.1017/S0266466600009063Google Scholar
Ewiss, N. A. and Fisher, D. (1984) The translog utility function and the demand for money in the United States. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 16, 3452.10.2307/1992647Google Scholar
Ewiss, N. A. and Fisher, D. (1985) Toward a consistent estimate of the substitutability between money and near monies: An application of the Fourier flexible form. Journal of Macroeconomics 7, 151174.10.1016/S0164-0704(85)80002-1Google Scholar
Fisher, D. and Fleissig, A. R. (1994) Money demand in a flexible dynamic Fourier expenditure system. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review 76, 117128.Google Scholar
Fisher, D. and Fleissig, A. R. (1997) Monetary aggregation and the demand for assets. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 29, 458475.10.2307/2953708Google Scholar
Fisher, I. (1922) The Making of Index Numbers: A Study of Their Varieties, Tests, and Reliability. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Fleissig, A. R. (1997) The dynamic Laurent flexible form and long-run analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics 12, 687699.10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199711/12)12:6<687::AID-JAE435>3.0.CO;2-S3.0.CO;2-S>Google Scholar
Fleissig, A. R. and Serletis, A. (2002) Seminonparametric estimates of substitution for Canadian monetary assets. Canadian Journal of Economics 35, 7891.10.1111/1540-5982.00121Google Scholar
Fleissig, A. R. and Swofford, J. L. (1996) A dynamic asymptotically ideal model of money demand. Journal of Monetary Economics 37, 371380.10.1016/0304-3932(96)01247-0Google Scholar
Gorman, W. M. (1959) Separable utility and aggregation. Econometrica 27, 469481.10.2307/1909472Google Scholar
Leontief, W. W. (1947) An introduction to a theory of the internal structure of functional relationships. Econometrica 15, 361373.10.2307/1905335Google Scholar
Morishima, M. (1967) A few suggestions on the theory of elasticity (in Japanese). Keizai Hyoron (Economic Review) 16, 144150.Google Scholar
Serletis, A. (1987) The demand for Divisia M1, M2, and M3 in the United States. Journal of Macroeconomics 9, 567591.10.1016/0164-0704(87)90020-6Google Scholar
Serletis, A. (1988) Translog flexible functional forms and substitutability of monetary assets. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 6, 5967.Google Scholar
Serletis, A. and Feng, G. (2010) Semi-nonparametric estimates of currency substitution between the Canadian dollar and the U.S. dollar. Macroeconomic Dynamics 14, 2955.10.1017/S1365100509080298Google Scholar
Serletis, A. and Isakin, M. (2017) Stochastic volatility demand systems. Econometric Reviews 36, 11111122.10.1080/07474938.2014.977091Google Scholar
Serletis, A. and Robb, A. L. (1986) Divisia aggregation and substitutability among monetary assets. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 18, 430446.10.2307/1992463Google Scholar
Serletis, A. and Shahmoradi, A. (2005) Semi-nonparametric estimates of the demand for money in the United States. Macroeconomic Dynamics 9, 542559.10.1017/S1365100505040307Google Scholar
Serletis, A. and Shahmoradi, A. (2007) Flexible functional forms, curvature conditions, and the demand for assets. Macroeconomic Dynamics 11, 455486.10.1017/S1365100507060154Google Scholar
Sono, M. (1961) The effect of price changes on the demand and supply of separable goods. International Economic Review 2, 239271.10.2307/2525430Google Scholar
Strotz, R. H. (1957) The empirical implications of a utility tree. Econometrica 25, 169180.10.2307/1910254Google Scholar
Strotz, R. H. (1959) The utility tree-A correction and further appraisal. Econometrica 27, 482488.10.2307/1909473Google Scholar