Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-21T21:12:13.640Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ASSESSMENT OF RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN GROWTH AND INEQUALITY: MICRO EVIDENCE FROM THAILAND

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2008

Hyeok Jeong
Hyeok Jeong*
Affiliation:
Vanderbilt University
*
Address correspondence to: Department of Economics, University of Southern California, 3620 S. Vermont Ave., Kaprielian Hall Room 300, Los Angeles, CA 90089, USA; Phone: +1 (213) 740-3512. Fax: +1 (213) 740-8543. e-mail: hjeong@usc.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper shows that growth and income distribution dynamics are closely linked through occupation, financial intermediation, and education. We use micro data from Thailand for 1976–1996. The compositional changes across these characteristics account for half of the Thai inequality increase and 40% of the Thai growth and poverty reduction. Financial deepening and educational expansion contributed to increasing inequality, whereas occupational transformation contributed to poverty alleviation. The changes in income gaps across the income–status groups, that is, divergence and then convergence, give rise to inverted-U inequality dynamics. These two growth-related components of inequality dynamics, composition and income-gap dynamics, explain virtually all the change in overall inequality, except its initial rise. Thus, inequality dynamics can be viewed as an integral part of the wider process of growth, as Kuznets speculated.

Keywords

Kuznets CurveTFP GrowthInequality DecompositionPoverty Decomposition
Type
Articles
Information
Macroeconomic Dynamics , Volume 12 , Supplement S2: Inequality , September 2008 , pp. 155 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alesina, Alberto and Rodrik, Dani (1994) Distributive politics and economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 465–490.Google Scholar
Ahluwalia Montek, S. (1976) Inequality, poverty, and development. Journal of Development Economics 3, 307–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, Sudhir and Kanbur, Ravi (1993) The Kuznets process and the inequality–development relationship. Journal of Development Economics 40, 25–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit and Duflo, Esther (2003) Inequality and growth: What can the data say? Journal of Economic growth 8, 267–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banerjee, Abhijit and Newman, Andrew F. (1993) Occupational choice and the process of development. Journal of Political Economy 101, 274–298.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, François (1979) Decomposable income inequality measures. Econometrica 47, 901–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourguignon, François, Ferreira, Francisco, and Leite, Phillippe (2002) Beyond Oaxaca–Blinder: Accounting for differences in household income distributions across countries. World Bank Policy Research working paper 2828.Google Scholar
Bourguignon, François, Ferreira, Francisco, and Lustig, Nora (2005) The Microeconomics of Income Distribution Dynamics in East Asia and Latin America. Washington, DC: World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Caselli, Francesco and John Coleman, Wilbur II (2001) The U.S. structural transformationl and regionall convergence: A reinterpretation. Journal of Political Economy 109, 584–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulter, Fiona, Cowell, Frank, and Jenkins, Stephen (1992) Equivalence scale relativities and the extent of inequality and poverty. Economic Journal 102, 1067–1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Datt, Gaurav and Ravallion, Martin (1992) Growth and redistribution components of changes in poverty measures. Journal of Development Economics 38, 275–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deininger, Klaus and Squire, Lyn (1996) A new data set measuring income inequality. World Bank Economic Review 10, 565–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiNardo, John, Fortin, Nicole M., and Lemieux, Thomas (1996) Labor market institutions and the distribution of wages, 1973–1992: A semiparametric approach. Econometrica 64, 1001–1044.Google Scholar
Fields Gary, S. and Jakubson, George H. (1994) New evidence on the Kuznets curve. Mimeo, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Fields Gary, S. (2001) Distribution and Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forbes Kristin, J. (2000) A reassessment of the relationship between inequality and growth. American Economic Review 90, 869–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Galor, Oded and Zeira, Joseph (1993) Income distribution and macroeconomics. Review of Economic Studies 60, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gine, Xavier and Townsend, Robert M. (2004) Evaluation of financial liberalization: A general equilibrium model with constrained occupational choice. Journal of Development Economics 74, 269–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, Jeremy and Jovanovic, Boyan (1990) Financial development, growth, and the distribution of income. Journal of Political Economy 98, 1076–1107.Google Scholar
Hsieh, Chang-Tai (2002) What explains the industrial revolution in East Asia. American Economic Review 92, 502–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Hyeok (2000) Sources of Kuznets Dynamics in Thailand. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Jeong, Hyeok and Kim, Yong J. (2006) Complementarity and transition to modern economic growth. IEPR Working Paper No. 5.31, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Hyeok and Townsend, Robert M. (2008) Growth and inequality: Model evaluation based on an estimation–calibration strategy. Macroeconomic Dynamics 12(Supplement 2), 231–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeong, Hyeok and Townsend, Robert M. (2007) Sources of TFP growth: Occupational choice and financial deepening. Economic Theory 32 (1), 179–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juhn, Chinhui, Murphy, Kevin M., and Pierce, Brooks (1993) Wage inequality and the rise in returns to skill. Journal of Political Economy 101, 410–442.Google Scholar
Knight John, B. and Sabot, Richard H. (1983) Educational expansion and the Kuznets effect. American Economic Review 73, 1132–1136.Google Scholar
Krusell, Per, Ohanian, Lee E., Ríos-Rull, Jóse-Víctor, and Violante, Giovanni L. (2000) Capital–skill complementarity and inequality: A macroeconomic analysis. Econometrica 68, 1029–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznets, Simon (1954) Underdeveloped countries and the pre-industrial phase in the advanced countries. In Agarwala, A.N. and Singh, S.P. (eds.). The Economics of Underdevelopment, pp. 135–153. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuznets, Simon (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. American Economic Review 45, 1–28.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. Arthur (1954) Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor. Manchester School 22, 139–191.Google Scholar
Lindert Peter, H. (1986) Unequal English wealth since 1670. Journal of Political Economy 94, 1127–1162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd-Ellis, Huw and Bernhardt, Dan (2000) Enterprise, inequality, and economic development. Review of Economic Studies 67, 147–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mookherjee, Dilip and Shorrocks, Anthony F. (1982) A decomposition analysis of the trend in UK income inequality. Economic Journal 92, 886–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, Young-Bum, Ross, David R., and Sabot, Richard H. (1996) Educational expansion and the inequality of pay in Brazil and Korea. In Birdsall, N. and Sabot, R.H. (eds.). Opportunity Foregone: Education in Brazil, pp. 267–287. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Ranis, Gus and Fei, John (1961) A theory of economic development. American Economic Review 51, 533–565.Google Scholar
Robinson, Sherman (1976) A note on the U hypothesis relating income inequality and economic development. American Economic Review 66, 437–440.Google Scholar
Saith, Ashwani (1983) Development and distribution: A critique of the cross-country U-hypothesis. Journal of Development Economics 13, 367–382.Google Scholar
Silverman Bernard, W. (1986) Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.Google Scholar
Shorrocks, A. F. (1980) The class of additively decomposable inequality measures. Econometrica 48, 613–625.Google Scholar
Summers, Robert and Heston, Alan (1991) The Penn World Table (Mark 5): An expanded set of international comparisons, 1950–1988. Quarterly Journal of Economics 106, 327–368.Google Scholar
Townsend Robert, M. (1994) Risk and insurance in village India. Econometrica 62, 539–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Townsend Robert, M. and Ueda, Kenichi (2006) Financial deepening, inequality, and growth. Review of Economic Studies 73 (1), 251–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villasenor Jose, A. and Arnold, Barry C. (1989) Elliptical Lorenz curves. Journal of Econometrics 40, 327–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, Alwyn (1995) The tyranny of numbers: Confronting the statistical realities of the East Asian growth experience. Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 641–680.Google Scholar