Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T02:27:58.118Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Umbilicaria subpolyphylla Oxner: the correct name for U. iberica Sancho & Krzewicka and its bipolar distribution pattern

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 June 2019

Evgeny A. DAVYDOV Open the ORCID record for Evgeny A. DAVYDOV [Opens in a new window] ,
Oleg B. BLUM ,
Grigory P. KASHEVAROV  and
Vladimir P. GRAKHOV
Evgeny A. DAVYDOV
Affiliation:
Altai State University – Herbarium (ALTB), Lenin Prosp. 61, Barnaul 656049, Russian Federation; Tigirek State Nature Reserve, Nikitina Str. 111, Barnaul 656043, Russian Federation. Email: eadavydov@yandex.ru
Oleg B. BLUM
Affiliation:
M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the Academy of Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Grigory P. KASHEVAROV
Affiliation:
M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the Academy of Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Vladimir P. GRAKHOV
Affiliation:
M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the Academy of Science of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Umbilicaria polyphylla aggregate (U. polyphylla (L.) Baumg., U. subpolyphylla Oxner and U. iberica Sancho & Krzewicka) is discussed based on morphological, chemical and molecular data. Umbilicaria iberica is proposed to be a later synonym of U. subpolyphylla. The constructed nrITS + mtLSU phylogeny, which includes specimens with wide geographical ranges, shows that both U. polyphylla and U. subpolyphylla are monophyletic and closely related. Both species have the same type of thalloconidia and identical secondary metabolites. Umbilicaria subpolyphylla has prominent phenotypic differences when compared to U. polyphylla including the monophyllous thallus with a dull upper surface and an elevated, slightly wrinkled centre, often covered with white pruina, and a medulla of the ‘U. havaasii’ type. Phylogenetic evidence for the bipolar distribution of both U. polyphylla and U. subpolyphylla is provided. Sympatric speciation in one region followed by long-distance dispersal seems to be the most plausible phylogeographical explanation for the observed patterns. Umbilicaria subpolyphylla is found in southern temperate-subtropical (Mediterranean) mountains, at least in Europe.

Keywords

biogeographyBosniaHPLClichen substancesmtLSUNew ZealandnrITSUmbilicaria polyphylla
Type
Articles
Information
The Lichenologist , Volume 51 , Issue 3 , May 2019 , pp. 205 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © British Lichen Society 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Passed away while the manuscript was in preparation.

References

Cubero, O. F., Crespo, A., Fatehi, J. & Bridge, P. D. (1999) DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbarium-stored, lichenized, and other fungi. Plant Systematics and Evolution 216: 243–249.Google Scholar
Culberson, C. F. & Kristinsson, H. A. (1970) A standardized method for the identification of lichen products. Journal of Chromatography 46: 85–93.Google Scholar
Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9: 772.Google Scholar
Davydov, E. A. (2017) Family Umbilicariaceae. In Lichen Flora of Russia: Genus Protoparmelia, Families Coenogoniaceae, Gyalectaceae, and Umbilicariaceae (Andreev, M. P. & Himelbrant, D. E., eds): 66–136. Moscow, St. Petersburg: KMK.Google Scholar
Davydov, E. A. & Zhurbenko, M. P. (2008) Contribution to Umbilicariaceae (lichenized Ascomycota) studies in Russia. I. Mainly Arctic species. Herzogia 21: 157–166.Google Scholar
Davydov, E. A., Himelbrant, D. E. & Stepanchikova, I. S. (2011) Contribution to the study of Umbilicariaceae (lichenized Ascomycota) in Russia. II. Kamchatka Peninsula. Herzogia 24: 229–241.Google Scholar
Davydov, E. A., Peršoh, D. & Rambold, G. (2017) Umbilicariaceae (lichenized Ascomycota) – trait evolution and a new generic concept. Taxon 66: 1282–1303.Google Scholar
Edgar, R. C. (2004) MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797.Google Scholar
Ekman, S. & Blaalid, R. (2011) The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae. Systematic Biology 60: 541–561.Google Scholar
Elix, J. A., Barbero, M., Giralt, M., Lumbsch, H. T. & McCaffery, L. F. (1995) 2"-O-methylgyrophoric acid, a new lichen tridepside. Australian Journal of Chemistry 48: 1761–1765.Google Scholar
Fernández-Mendoza, F. & Printzen, C. (2013) Pleistocene expansion of the bipolar lichen Cetraria aculeata into the Southern Hemisphere. Molecular Ecology 22: 1961–1983.Google Scholar
Frey, E. (1936) Vorarbeiten zu einer Monographie der Umbilicariaceen. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 45: 198–230.Google Scholar
Galloway, D. (2007) Flora of New Zealand Lichens. Revised Second Edition Including Lichen-Forming and Lichenicolous Fungi. Volumes 1 and 2. Lincoln, New Zealand: Manaaki Whenua Press.Google Scholar
Gardes, M. & Bruns, T. D. (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for basidiomycetes – application to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Molecular Ecology 2: 113–118.Google Scholar
Garrido-Benavent, I. & Pérez-Ortega, S. (2017) Past, present and future research in bipolar lichen-forming fungi and their photobionts. American Journal of Botany 104: 1660–1674.Google Scholar
Garrido-Benavent, I., de los Ríos, A., Fernández-Mendoza, F. & Pérez-Ortega, S. (2018) No need for stepping stones: direct, joint dispersal of the lichen-forming fungus Mastodia tessellata (Ascomycota) and its photobiont explains their bipolar distribution. Journal of Biogeography 45: 213–224.Google Scholar
Hasenhüttl, G. & Poelt, J. (1978) Über die Brutkorner bei der Flechtengattung Umbilicaria. Berichte der Deutschen Botanischen Gesellschaft 91: 275–296.Google Scholar
Henssen, A. (1970) Die Apothecienentwicklung bei Umbilicaria Hoffm. emend. Frey. Vorträge aus dem Gesamtgebiet der Botanik, Neue Folge (Deutsche Botanische Gesellschaft) 4: 103–126.Google Scholar
Hestmark, G. (1990) Thalloconidia in the genus Umbilicaria. Nordic Journal of Botany 9: 547–574.Google Scholar
Hestmark, G. (1991) To sex or not to sex... structures and strategies of reproduction in the family Umbilicariaceae (Lecanorales, Ascomycetes). Sommerfeltia Supplement 3: 1–47.Google Scholar
Hestmark, G., Skogesal, O. & Skullerud, O. (2004) Growth, reproduction, and population structure in four alpine lichens during 240 years of primary colonization. Canadian Journal of Botany 82: 1356–1362.Google Scholar
Kristinsson, H., Zhurbenko, M. & Hansen, E. S. (2010) Panarctic Checklist of Lichens and Lichenicolous Fungi. Akureyri: CAFF Technical Report No. 20, CAFF International Secretariat.Google Scholar
Krzewicka, B., García, M. A., Johansen, S. D., Sancho, L. G. & Martín, M. P. (2009) Morphological and nuclear ribosomal DNA data support distinguishing two new species of Umbilicaria (Umbilicariaceae, Ascomycota) from Europe. Lichenologist 41: 631–648.Google Scholar
Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S. Y. W. & Guindon, S. (2012) PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 1695–1701.Google Scholar
Larget, B. & Simon, D. (1999) Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16: 750–759.Google Scholar
Librado, P. & Rozas, J. (2009) DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25: 1451–1452.Google Scholar
Llano, G. A. (1950) A Monograph of the Lichen Family Umbilicariaceae in the Western Hemisphere. Washington, D. C.: Office of Naval Research, Department of the Navy.Google Scholar
Masson, D. (2010) Cinq additions à la flore macrolichénique française. Bulletin de la Société Linnéenne de Bordeaux 38: 149–159.Google Scholar
Narui, T., Culberson, C. F., Culberson, W. L., Johnson, A. & Shibata, S. (1996) A contribution to the chemistry of the lichen family Umbilicariaceae (Ascomycotina). Bryologist 99: 199–211.Google Scholar
Narui, T., Sawada, K., Takatsuki, S., Okuyama, T., Culberson, C. F., Culberson, W. L. & Shibata, S. (1998) NMR assignments of depsides and tridepsides of the lichen family Umbilicariaceae. Phytochemistry 48: 815–822.Google Scholar
Øvstedal, D. O. & Lewis Smith, R. I. (2001) Lichens of Antarctica and South Georgia. A Guide to Their Identification and Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oxner, A. N. (1968) Flora of Ukraine. Vol. 2 (Issue 1). Kyiv: Naukova Dumka.Google Scholar
Printzen, C. (2002) Fungal specific primers for PCR-amplification of mitochondrial LSU in lichens. Molecular Ecology Notes 2: 130–132.Google Scholar
Ronquist, R., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D. L., Darling, A., Höhna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M. A. & Huelsenbeck, J. P. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542.Google Scholar
Seriña, E., Arroyo, R., Manrique, E. & Sancho, L. G. (1996) Lichen substances and their intraspecific variability within eleven Umbilicaria species in Spain. Bryologist 99: 335–342.Google Scholar
Silvestro, D. & Michalak, I. (2012) RaxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity and Evolution 12: 335–337.Google Scholar
Stamatakis, A. (2014) RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30: 1312–1313.Google Scholar
Valladares, F. & Sancho, L. G. (1995) Medullary structure of the Umbilicariaceae. Lichenologist 27: 189–199.Google Scholar
Vilgalys, R. & Hester, M. (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4238–4246.Google Scholar
Wei, J. C. & Jiang, Y. M. (1993) The Asian Umbilicariaceae (Ascomycota). Mycosystema Monographicum Series No. 1. Beijing: International Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
White, T. J., Bruns, T. D., Lee, S. B. & Taylor, J. W. (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis, M. A., Gelfand, D. H., Sninsky, J. J. & White, T. J., eds): 315–322. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Williams, M., Gummer, H., Powlesland, R., Robertson, H. & Taylor, G. (2006) Migrations and Movements of Birds to New Zealand and Surrounding Seas. Wellington: Science & Technical Publishing, Department of Conservation, New Zealand.Google Scholar
Zoller, S., Lutzoni, F. & Scheidegger, C. (1999) Genetic variation within and among populations of the threatened lichen Lobaria pulmonaria in Switzerland and implications for its conservation. Molecular Ecology 8: 2049–2059.Google Scholar