Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-xq9c7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-07T05:33:50.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Industrial Standardisation in Cyrenaica during the Second and Third Centuries A.D.: The Evidence from Locally Manufactured Pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2015

Extract

A detailed study of the coarse pottery of Cyrenaica, and particularly Berenice, in the Hellenistic and Roman periods (Riley, in press) indicates that, with the exception of the total disappearance of locally made amphoras, the Romanisation of Cyrenaica made no impact on the local pottery industry until around the middle of the second century A.D. Indeed, at a time of rapidly increasing prosperity in Cyrenaica from the Augustan period, the local pottery industry continued to produce poor quality goods in general. These were generally of the poor, shell rich fabrics (for these and Cyrenaican fabrics in general, see Riley, 1979), and comprised a wide range of variation within broad type groupings, which were of the characteristic, elegantly curved Hellenistic tradition.

When change came, around the middle of the second century, it was sweeping. The poorer quality shell rich fabric was superceded by the harder, sturdier, lime rich fabrics, and a completely new repertoire of angular and corrugated forms was introduced. This development appears to follow a similar pattern in the Aegean region during the early part of the second century, so that by the latter part of that century there is a striking typological similarity between the various coarse wares in Greece, Crete and Cyrenaica.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Society for Libyan Studies 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, W. Y., 1979. On the Argument from Ceramics to History: A Challenge Based on Evidence from Medieval Nubia. Current Anthropolocy, 20: 727744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraser, P. M., 1950. Hadrian and Cyrene. Journal of Roman Studies, 40: 7790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenfell, B. P., Hunt, A. S. and Smyly, J. G. (ed.), The Tebtunis Papyri, London, 1902–1976Google Scholar
Johnson, A. C., 1936. Roman Egypt to the Region of Diocletian. In (ed.) Frank, T., An Economic Survey of Ancient Rome, LondonGoogle Scholar
Krywonos, W., Newton, G. W. A., Riley, J. A. and Robinson, V. J., 1980. Neutron Activation Analysis of Roman Coarse Wares from Cyrenaica. Archaeometry, 22, 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, J. A. (ed.), 1977. Excavations at Sidi Khrebish, Benghazi Berenice, I, Tripoli, Department of AntiquitiesGoogle Scholar
Orton, C. R., 1974. An Experiment in the Mathematical Reconstruction of the Pottery from a Romano–British Kiln Site at Highgate Wood, London. Bulletin of the Institute of Archaeology, 11: 4173Google Scholar
Riley, J. A., 1979. The Penological Investigation of Roman and Islamic Ceramics from Cyrenaica. Libyan Studies, 10: 3546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. A., in press. The Coarse Pottery from Benghazi. In (ed.) Lloyd, J. A., Sidi Khrebish Excavations, Benghazi (Berenice), II, Tripoli, 91467Google Scholar
Robinson, H. S., 1959. The Athenian Agora, Volume V. Pottery of the Roman Period, Princeton, American School of Classical Studies in AthensGoogle Scholar