Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T12:29:29.644Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An integrated methodology for the documentation and protection of cultural heritage in the MENA region: a case study from Libya and Tunisia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2020

Anna Leone
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Durham University
Will Wootton
Affiliation:
Department of Classics, King's College London
Corisande Fenwick
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London
Marco Nebbia
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology, Durham University
Hiba Alkhalaf
Affiliation:
Department of Classics, King's College London
Gaygysyz Jorayev
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeology, University College London
Ammar Othman
Affiliation:
Institut National du Patrimoine de Tunisie
Muftah A. Alhddad
Affiliation:
Azzaytouna University, Tarhuna, Libya
Morgan Belzic
Affiliation:
Mission Archéologique Française pour la Libye antique/École Pratiques des Hautes Études/Department of Archaeology, Durham University
Ahmad Emrage
Affiliation:
University of Benghazi, Libya
Ziad Siala
Affiliation:
Department of Antiquities of Libya
Patricia Voke
Affiliation:
Wessex Archaeology/Department of Archaeology, Durham University

Abstract

This paper presents the methodology and overall outcomes from the Training in Action project (TinA), funded by the British Council's Cultural Protection Fund between 2017 and 2019, which has built capacity among 72 employees of the Department of Antiquities of Libya (DoA) and the Institut National du Patrimoine de Tunisie (INP). It highlights the integrated and comprehensive nature of the training based on an innovative approach designed to increase value and impact. The integrated methodology, combining documentation, conservation and management, serves as a reproducible and sustainable model for other capacity-building projects. TinA was developed and carried out collaboratively by academics at Durham University, King's College London and University College London, and in partnership with the DoA and INP.

تقدم هذه الورقة المنهجية والنتائج الإجمالية لمشروع التدريب أثناء العمل (TinA)، الممول من صندوق حماية الثقافة التابع للمجلس الثقافي البريطاني في الفترة ما بين 2017–2019، والذي قام ببناء قدرات اثنين وسبعين من موظفي مصلحة الآثار الليبية (DOA) و المعهد الوطني للتراث التونسي (INP). و تسلط الضوء على الطبيعة المتكاملة والشاملة للتدريب على أساس نهج مبتكر مصمم لزيادة القيمة و التأثير. تعمل المنهجية المتكاملة، التي تجمع بين التوثيق والحفظ والإدارة، كنموذج قابل للاستنساخ و مستدام لمشاريع بناء القدرات الأخرى. تم تطوير TinA وتنفيذه بشكل تعاوني من قبل الأكاديميين في جامعة دورهام و جامعة الملك بلندن (KCL) و جامعة لندن (UCL)، وبالشراكة مع مصلحة الآثار الليبية و المعهد الوطني للتراث التونسي .

Type
Part 3: Fieldwork Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for Libyan Studies 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdulkariem, A. 2013. Involving the local community in the protection of the heritage and archaeology of Cyrene. Libyan Studies 44: 103106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdulkariem, A. and Bennett, P. 2014. Libyan heritage under threat: the case of Cyrene. Libyan Studies 45: 155161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Al Raeid, F., Di Valerio, E., Di Antonio, M.G., Menozzi, O., Abdalgader el Mziene, M.A.S. and and Tamburrino, C. 2016. The main issues of the Cyrene necropolis and the use of remote sensing for monitoring in the case of the eastern necropolis. Libyan Studies 47: 730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banning, E. 2002. Archaeological Survey. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baratte, F. and Béjaoui, F. 2014. Basiliques chrétiennes d'Afrique du Nord II - Monuments de la Tunisie. Ausonius, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
Barry, M. 1885. Note sur les ruines de Yonga (Macomades minores). Bulletin Archéologique du comité des travaux historiques et scientifiques 1885: 320324.Google Scholar
Belmabrouk, N. 2016. Macomades Minorres- Iunci: cite et territoire. Thèse de doctorat sous la direction de Abdellafit Mrabet, Faculté des lettres et Sciences Humaine de Sousse.Google Scholar
Belzic, M. 2017. Les Sculptures funéraires de Cyrénaïque sur le marché de l'art. Libyan Studies 48: 105116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Baaziz, S. 1992. La carte nationale des sites archéologiques et des monuments historiques. Bulletin des travaux de l'Institut National du Patrimoine: comptes rendus 6: 115.Google Scholar
Bennett, P. and Barker, G. 2011. Protecting Libya's Archaeological Heritage. The African Archaeological Review 28(1): 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bewley, R., Wilson, A.I., Kennedy, D., Mattingly, D.J., Banks, R., Bishop, M., Bradbury, J., Cunliffe, E., Fradley, M., Jennings, R., Mason, R., Rayne, L., Sterry, M., Sheldrick, N. and Zerbini, A. 2016. Endangered archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa: introducing the EAMENA Project. In S. Campana, R. Scopigno, G. Carpentiero, and M. Cirillo (eds), CAA2015. Keep the Revolution Going: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Archaeopress, Oxford: 919932.Google Scholar
Brodie, N. 2015. Why is no one talking about Libya's cultural destruction? Near Eastern Archaeology 78(3): 212217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodie, N. 2017. The role of Conservators in facilitating the thefts and trafficking of cultural objects: the case of a seized Libyan Statue. Libyan Studies 48: 117123.Google Scholar
Chaouali, M., Fenwick, C. and Booms, D. 2018. Bulla Regia I: A new church and Christian cemetery. Libyan Studies 49: 187197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of Europe. 2005. Guidance on Heritage Assessment - our cultural diversity is what unites us. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2009. Guidance on Inventory and Documentation of the Cultural Heritage. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. 2012. Guidelines on Cultural Heritage Technical Tools for Heritage Conservation and Management. Strasbourg.Google Scholar
Demas, M. 2002. Planning for Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites: A Values-Based Approach. In Teutonico, J.M. and Palumbo, G. (eds), Management planning for archaeological sites : an international workshop organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and Loyola Marymount University, 19–22 May 2000, Corinth, Greece. Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles: 2754.Google Scholar
Djelloul, N. 1993. A propos d'un toponyme de la région de Sfax : Qasr Ziyâd, dans La dynamique économique à Sfax entre la passé et le présent, 1er colloque international 28-30 novembre 1991, Publication A.S.M.S: 945.Google Scholar
Djelloul, N. 1999. Les fortifications en Tunisie. Ministe`re de la culture, Agence de mise en valeur du patrimoine et de promotion culturelle, Tunis.Google Scholar
English Heritage. 2008 Geophysical Survey in Archaeological Field Evaluation. Research and Professional Service Guideline No 1. Swindon (2nd Edition).Google Scholar
Ensoli, S. (ed.). 2012. For the Preservation of the Cultural Heritage in Libya: A Dialogue among Institutions. Proceedings of Conference, 1–2 July 2011, Monumental Complex of Belvedere. San Leucio, Caserta. Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa.Google Scholar
Fitzjohn, M. 2009. The use of GIS in Landscape heritage and attitudes to place - Digital Deep Maps. In Sorenson, M.L. and Carman, J. (eds), Heritage studies: methods and approaches Routledge, London: 116.Google Scholar
Foster, S. and Linge, L. 2002. World Heritage Site, buffer zones: statements of fact or aspiration? Journal conservation of Management of Archaeological Sites 5: 141150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gizzi, F.T., Biscione, M., Danese, M., Maggio, A., Pecci, A., Sileo, M., Potenza, M.R., Masini, N., Ruggeri, A., Sileo, A., Mercurio, F. and School-Work Alternation (SWA) Working Group (WG) 2019. Project Report Students Meet Cultural Heritage: An Experience within the Framework of the Italian School-Work Alternation (SWA)—From Outcomes to Outlooks. Heritage 2(3): 19862016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirtz, C. 2014. Contributions of GIS and satellite-based remote sensing to landscape archaeology in the Middle East. Journal of Archaeological research 22: 229276.Google Scholar
Hobson, M. 2019. EAMENA training in the use of satellite remote sensing and digital technologies in heritage management: Libya and Tunisia workshops 2017–2019. Libyan Studies 50: 6371.Google Scholar
IPAMED 2005 ‘IPAMED: Carte Informatisée du Patrimoine’ http://www.inp.rnrt.tn/Carte_archeo/pdf/Fr/LV_IPAMED.pdf (accessed 1 September 2019).Google Scholar
Jorayev, G., Wehr, K., Benito-Calvo, A., Njau, J. and de la Torre, I. 2016. Imaging and photogrammetry models of Olduvai Gorge (Tanzania) by Unmanned Aerial Vehicles: A high-resolution digital database for research and conservation of Early Stone Age sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 75: 4056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kane, S. 2015. Archaeology and cultural heritage in post-revolution Libya. Near Eastern Archaeology 78(3): 204211.Google Scholar
Kenrick, P. 2012. Conservation and presentation of cultural heritage: the importance of education. In Ensoli, S. (ed.), For the Preservation of the Cultural Heritage in Libya: A Dialogue among Institutions. Proceedings of Conference (1–2 July 2011, Monumental Complex of Belvedere, San Leucio, Caserta). Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa: 145146.Google Scholar
Lafrenz Samuels, K. 2009. Trajectories of development: International Heritage management of Archaeology in the Middle East and North Africa. Archaeologies 2009: 6891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E.C. 1991. Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leone, A. 2007. Changing Townscapes in North Africa from Late Antiquity to the Arab conquest. Edipuglia, Bari.Google Scholar
Leone, A. 2013. The End of the Pagan City. Religion, Economy and Urbanism in Late Antique North Africa. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letellier, R. and Eppich, R. 2011. Recording, Documentation and Information. Management for the conservation of Heritage Places, London.Google Scholar
Levin, N., Ali, S., Crandall, D. and Kark, S. 2019. World Heritage in danger: Big data and remote sensing can help protect sites in conflict zones. Global environmental change 55: 97104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahfoud, F. 2014. Lumières des sources, Regard des auteurs arabes sur le passé antique de l'Ifriqiya. Presse universitaire le la Mannouba.Google Scholar
Mattingly, D.J. 2012. Conservation issues in the Libyan oasis belts. In Ensoli, S. (ed.), For the Preservation of the Cultural Heritage in Libya: A Dialogue among Institutions. Proceedings of Conference (1–2 July 2011, Monumental Complex of Belvedere, San Leucio, Caserta). Fabrizio Serra Editore, Pisa: 2732.Google Scholar
Mason, R. and Avrami, E. 2000. Heritage values and challenges of conservation planning. In Management Planning for Archaeological Sites, an International Workshop organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and the Loyola Marymount University May 2000, Corinth, Greece: 13–26.Google Scholar
Menozzi, O. 2016. Libya: archaeology in war and archaeology of the war. In S. Santoro (ed.), Skills and Tools to the Cultural Heritage and Cultural Tourism Management Archaeology: Proceedings of the Conference, 13 April 2012, Chieti. CHTMBAL Project 2. Edizioni D'Errico, Teramo: 91110.Google Scholar
Menozzi, O., Di Valerio, E., Tamburrino, C., Shariff, A., D'Ercole, V. and Di Antonio, M. 2017. A race against time: monitoring the necropolis and the territory of Cyrene and Giaraburb through protocols of remote sensing. Libyan Studies 48: 69103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menozzi, O., Cherstich, L., Di Valerio, E., Di Antonio, M. and Abdalrahim Shariff Saad, A. 2019. A proposal for the use of Core and Buffer Zones to protect the heritage of the Cyrenean landscapes. Libyan Studies 50: 107135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munzi, M. and Zocchi, A. 2017. The Lepcitanian territory: cultural heritage in danger in war and peace. Libyan Studies 48: 5167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nebbia, N., Leone, A., Bockmann, R., Hddad, M., Abdouli, H., Masoud, A.M., Elkendi, N., Hamoud, H., Adam, S. and Khatab, M. 2016. Developing a Collaborative Strategy to Manage and Preserve Cultural Heritage During the Libyan Conflict. The Case of the Gebel Nāfusa. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 23(4): 971988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicholas, G. and Hollowell, J. 2007. Ethical challenges to a postcolonial archaeology: the legacy of scientific colonialism. In Hamilakis, Y. and Duke, P. (eds), Archaeology and capitalism. Walnut Creek, Left Coast Press, California: 5982.Google Scholar
Othman, A. 2004. «A propos d'une inscription inédite dans la zâwiya de Sidi Ahmad `Absa». Africa XX 2004: 167176.Google Scholar
Othman, A. 2017. Saints de la région de Sfax : des hommes et des monuments. Edition Md Ali, Sfax.Google Scholar
Othman, A., Belmabrouk, N., Leone, A., Voke, P., Wootton, W., Alkhalaf, H., Utrero Agudo, M., José I. Murillo Fragero, M., Nebbia, M., Marinato, M. Pavan forthcoming. Protecting and Managing the Site of Iunca (Tunisia), AFRICA.Google Scholar
Paolini, A., Vafadari, A., Cesaro, G., Quintero, M.S., van Balen, K., Vileikis, O. and Fakhoury, L. 2012. Risk Management at Heritage Sites: A Case Study of the Petra World Heritage Site. Rafidi Print, Amman.Google Scholar
Perelli, C. and Sistu, G. 2013. Jasmines for tourists: heritage policies in Tunisia. In J. Kaminski, A.M. Benson, and D. Arnold (eds), Contemporary Issues in Cultural Heritage Tourism. Routledge, London: 99115.Google Scholar
Perring, D. and van der Linde, S. 2009. The Politics and Practice of Archaeology in Conflict. Conservation and Management of Archaeological Sites 11 3–4: 197213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poinssot, L. 1944. Macomades Iunci, Mémoires de la Société Nationale des Antiquaires de France, 81 (NS 1): 133-169Google Scholar
Prince, R. 2013. Purge of the marabouts: Salafists target Tunisia's Islamic heritage. Foreign Policy in Focus 5. April. Available at: http://fpif.org/purge_of_the_marabouts_salafists_target_tunisias_islamic_heritage/ (accessed on 14 August 2017).Google Scholar
Pyburn, A. 2003. Archaeology for a New Millennium: The Rules of Engagement. In Derry, L. and Malloy, M. (eds), Archaeologists and Local Communities. Society for American Archaeology, Washington, DC: 167–84.Google Scholar
Pringle, D. 1981. The Defence of Byzantine Africa from Justinian to the Arab Conquest. vols. 1-2. BAR International Series, Oxford.Google Scholar
Rayne, L., Sheldrick, N. and Nikolaus, J. 2017. Endangered Archaeology in Libya: Recording Damage and Destruction. Libyan Studies 48: 2349. doi:10.1017/lis.2017.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, V. 2018. The Radicalization of Heritage in Tunisia. International Journal of Islamic Architecture 7(1): 6784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starzman, M.T. 2008. Cultural imperialism and heritage politics in the event of armed conflict: prospects for an ‘activist archaeology’. Archaeologies: Journal of the World Archaeological Congress 4(3): 368–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sullivan, S. 1997. A Planning Model for the Management of Archaeological Sites. In de la Torre, Marta (ed.), The Conservation of Archaeological Sites in the Mediterranean Region. Proceedings of an International Conference organized by the Getty Conservation Institute and the J. Paul Getty Museum, May 1995. The Getty Conservation Institute, Los Angeles: 15–26.Google Scholar
The National Center for Preservation Technology and Training. 2011. Rapid Building and Site Condition Assessment. Available at https://www.ncptt.nps.gov/wp-content/uploads/Rapid-NCPTT-Building-Site-Assessment-Form-2011-Update1.pdf (accessed on 1 September 2019).Google Scholar
Talbi, M. 1966. L'Emirat aghlabide, 184/296-800/909, histoires politiques. Adrien-Maisonneuve, Paris.Google Scholar
Teutonico, J.M. and Friedman, L. 2018. ‘MOSAIKON 2008–2018: Objectives, Outcomes, Opportunities’, Conservation Perspectives. The GCI Newsletter 33(1): 1012.Google Scholar
Trousset, P. 2003. Iunci. Encyclopédie Berbère 25: 38063812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNESCO 2013. Managing Cultural World Heritage. Manual. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, Paris.Google Scholar
Vafadari, A. 2015. Guidelines for Conducting Rapid Condition assessment of Bagan Monuments. UNESCO Unpublished Report.Google Scholar
Vafadari, A., Philip, G., and Jennings, R. 2017. Damage assessment and monitoring of cultural heritage places in a disaster and post-disaster event – a case study of Syria. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W5: 695701, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-695-2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waller, R.R. 2003. Cultural property risk analysis model: development and application to preventive conservation at the Canadian Museum of Nature. Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis, Göteborg.Google Scholar
Walton, T. 2003. Methods for Monitoring the Condition of Historic Places. New Zealand Department of Conservation, Wellington.Google Scholar
Waugh, W.L. and Streib, G. 2006. Collaboration and Leadership. Effective Emergency Management, Publica Administration Review (Nov. 2006). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00673.xGoogle Scholar
Wootton, W.T., El-Habashi, A., Stewart, J. and Walda, H. 2015. Conserving and managing mosaics in Libya (CaMMiL): The final project review. Libyan Studies 46: 103113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank 2001. Cultural Heritage and Development: A Framework for Action in the Middle East and North Africa. Orientations in development series. World Bank, Washington, DC.Google Scholar