Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pjpqr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T18:26:58.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Mens Rea of Superior Responsibility as Developed by ICTY Jurisprudence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2004

Abstract

The Statute of the ICTY incorporates the customary international law principle of superior responsibility. Where a superior knew or had reason to know that subordinates were about to commit or committed a crime, he/she is under an obligation to take preventative or punitive measures against subordinates. The mens rea, or knowledge, of a superior is pivotal in determining his/her criminal responsibility. However, despite the customary law status of the principle of Superior Responsibility, the definition and standard of mens rea applied has varied. The ICTY Trial Chambers in the Čelebići and Blaškić cases reached opposite findings on the definition of the term “had reason to know” under customary law. The Appeals Chamber has rendered its definition of mens rea. However, the standard applied appears inconsistent with the principle of Superior Responsibility.

Type
HAGUE INTERNATIONAL TRIBUNALS
Copyright
© 2001 Kluwer Law International

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)