Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-cjp7w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-02T11:31:41.994Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Racing populations, sexing environments: the challenges of a feminist politics in international law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Doris Buss
Doris Buss*
Affiliation:
Keele University
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 1994, feminist activists made headlines at the United Nations Cairo Conference on Population and Development for their highly organised and influential lobbying. The final agreement negotiated at Cairo reflected this involvement by specifically referring to women's reproductive rights, and by recognising the complex relationship between population policy, environmental security and economic growth. International population policy, defined broadly as the array of international projects and actors involved in efforts to curb population growth, is an increasingly important arena for the contestation of social values and the meaning of global community. In this paper, I offer a re-reading of the 1994 Cairo agreement, and population policy more generally, in the context of colonial discourses around race and gender, which articulate with constructions of the population ‘problem’. Focusing on the language of environment and economic growth, I examine how racialised conceptions of ‘dangerous’ fertility are reinforced rather than challenged by the Cairo agreement. Through this analysis, I attempt to first, make explicit the international inequality that structures international law and policy, and secondly, outline some of the challenges facing feminist engagement with international law.

Type
Research Article
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , November 2000 , pp. 463 - 484
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2000

References

1. See eg F Anthias and N Yuval-Davis Racialized Boundaries: Race, Nation, Gender, Colour and Class und the Anti-Racist Struggle (London and New York: Routledge, 1992).

2. The Cairo Programme was subject to a five-year review in 1998 (Cairo +5) resulting in a United Nations General Assembly resolution outlining gains made since 1994 and scope for further improvement. As that review was not intended to rewrite or reconsider agreement reached at Cairo, this paper focuses on the 1994 agreement as the current international framework. For a discussion of some aspects of Cairo +5, see D Buss “’ How the U.N. Stole Childhood”: The Christian Right and the International Convention on the Rights of the Child’, forthcoming in J Bridgeman and D Monk Feminist Perspectives on Child Care Law (London: Cavendish, forthcoming).

3. G Sen ‘The World Programme of Action: A New Paradigm for Population’ (1995) 37 Environment 10, 11.

4. This is not to suggest that feminists have completely overlooked the racial dimension of population policies. See eg A Bandarage Women, Population and Global Crisis: A Political-Economic Analysis (London and New Jersey: Zed Books, 1997); J Alexander ‘Mobilizing against the State and International “Aid” Agencies: “Third World” Women Define Reproductive Freedom’ in M G Fried From Abortion to Reproductive Freedom: Transforming a Movement (Boston, MA: South End Press, 1990); L Briggs ‘Discourses of “Forced Sterilization” in Puerto Rico: The Problems with the Speaking Subaltern’ (1998) 10 Differences 30. However, within the feminist literature concerning the Cairo Conference very little comment or analysis is made of race or economic inequality in the context of population policy.

5. Sen, above n 3; B B Crane and S L Isaacs ‘The Cairo Programme of Action: A New Framework for International Cooperation on Population and Development Issues’ (1995) 36 Harv Int LJ 295; C A McIntosh and J L Finkle ‘The Cairo Conference on Population and Development: A New Paradigm?’ (1995) 21 Population and Development Rev 233; R Petchesky Commentary: ‘From Population Control to Reproductive Rights: Feminist Fault Lines’ (1995) 6 Reproductive Health Matters 152.

6. My use of ‘Third World women’ in this context is taken from Chandra Talpade Mohanty, who argues that “Third World” retains a certain heuristic value and explanatory specificity in relation to the inheritance of colonialism and contemporary neocolonial economic and geopolitical processes’: ‘Women Workers and Capitalist Scripts: Ideologies of Domination, Common Interests, and the Politics of Solidarity’ in M J Alexander and C T Mohanty Feminist Genealogies, Colonial Legacies, Democratic Futures (New York and London: Routledge, 1997) p 7.

7. An exception to this are aboriginal and some poor communities within Western countries that are often treated as ‘other’ to the dominant population and have a status akin to Third World or developing countries. For these groups, demographics and related issues such as child custody have been subject to intervention by the dominant population. See M Kline ‘The Colour of Law: Ideological Representations of First Nations in Legal Discourse’ (1994) 3 4 Social and Legal Studies 451. Because the Cairo process is overtly directed at populations in the Third World, this is the focus of my analysis.

8. A Harris ‘Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory’ (1990) 42 Stan L Rev 581; b hooks Ain't I a Woman: Black Women and Feminism (Boston, MA: South End, 1981); M Kline ‘Race, Racism, and Feminist Legal Theory’ (1989) 12 Harv Women's LJ 115.

9. Imperial Leather: Race, Gender mid Sexuality in the Colonial Context (New York and London: Routledge, 1995) p 4–5. Emphasis in the original.

10. Briggs, above n 4; G Spivak ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ in C Nelson and L Grossberg Marxism and the Interpretation of Cultures (Urbana: University of Illinois, 1988).

11. Briggs, above n 4, for example, demonstrates how US feminist critiques of ‘forced sterilization’ in Puerto Rico inadvertently echoed US colonial justifications for intervention in Puerto Rico.

12. A Loomba Colonialism/Postcolonialism (London & New York: Routledge, 1998) pp 15–17.

13. E Said Orientalism (New York: Vintage, 1979); Loomba, above n 12.

14. McClintock, above n 9, p 5, 8.

15. Loomba, above n 12, p 47.

16. ‘Foucault on Power: A Theory for Women’ in L J Nicholson Feminism/Postmodernism (New York and London: Routledge, 1990) p 161.

17. Bandarage, above n 4, p 51.

18. F Furedi Population and Development: A Critical Introduction (Cambridge: Polity, 1997) p 17.

19. B Hartmann Reproductive Rights arid Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control arid Contraceptive Choice (New York: Harper & Row, 1987) p 57; See also B B Crane ‘International Population Institutions: Adaptation to a Changing World Order’ in P M Haas, R O Keohane and M A Levy Institutions for the Earth: Sources of Effective Environmental Protection (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1994) pp 351–393, and discussion below.

20. Said, above n 13, p 7.

21. Loomba, above n 12, p 47.

22. Comaroff, J. and Comaroff, J. Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism, and Consciousness in South Africa I (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991) p 105 Google Scholar.

23. Thanks to my colleague Michael Thomson for making this connection for me and for his assistance with this section more generally.

24. J J Pettman Worlding Women: A Feminist International Politics (London and New York: Routledge, 1996) p 25–44.

25. Above n 9, p 22.

26. Above n 9, p 22.

27. Above n 9, p 22.

28. Above n 9, p 48.

29. Above n 9, p 23; see also Comaroff and Comaroff, above n 22, p 90

30. E Burman ‘Innocents Abroad: Western Fantasies of Childhood and the Iconography of Emergencies’ (1994) 18 Disasters 238.

31. b hooks Black Looks: Race and Representation (Boston, MA: South End, 1992) pp 61–77.

32. McClintock, above n 9, pp 352–389.

33. Hartmann, above n 19, p 57; see also Crane, above n 19, pp 351–393.

34. For a discussion of these conferences and the evolution of international population policy, see S Cornea, in collaboration with R Reichmann Population rind Reproductive Rights: Feminist Perspectives from the South(New Delhi and London: Kali for Women and Zed Books in association with DAWN, 1994): Crane, above n 19; J Finkle and B B Crane ‘Ideology and Politics at Mexico City: The United States at the 1984 International Conference on Population’ (1985) 11 Population and Development Rev I; Hartmann, above n 19; Sen, above n 3.

35. A Germain, S Nowrojee and H Hnin Pyne ‘Setting a New Agenda: Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights’ in G Sen, A Germain, L C Chen Population Policies Reconsidered: Health, Empowerment, arid Rights (Boston, MA: Harvard School of Public Health, 1994).

36. Corrěa, above n 34, p 62; Germain, Nowrojee, Hin Pyne, above n 35, pp 37–41.

37. A Higer ‘International Women's Activism and the 1994 Cairo Population Conference’ in M K Meyer and E Prügl Gender Politics in Global Governance (Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield, 1999) p 127.

38. above n 37, p 130.

39. above n 37, pp 127–131.

40. Petchesky, above n 5, p 152; See also D Buss ‘Robes, Relics, and Rights: The Vatican and the Beijing Conference on Women’ (1998) 7 Social and Legal Studies 339.

41. Report of the International Conference on Population and Development, Cairo 5-13 September 1994. Annex, Programme of Action of the International Conference on Population and Development, A/CONF. 171/13, 18 October 1994. An electronic version is available from the United Nations Population Information Network.

42. Petchesky, above n 5, pp 154–155; R P Petchesky ‘Spiraling Discourses of Reproductive and Sexual Rights: A Post-Beijing Assessment of International Feminist Politics’ in C J Cohen and K B Jones and J C Tronto Women Transforming Politics: An Alternative Reader (New York and London: New York University Press, 1997) p 570.

43. R Copelon and R Petchesky ‘Toward an Interdependent Approach to Reproductive and Sexual Rights as Human Rights: Reflections on the ICPD and Beyond’ in M A Schuler From Basic Needs to Basic Rights: Women's Claim to Human Rights (Washington: Institute for Women, Law and Development, 1994) p 343.

44. Petchesky, above n 5.

45. An Essay on the Principle of Population (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1970).

46. (London: Pan Books, 1971). See also P Ehrlich and A Ehrlich Population, Resources Environment, (San Francisco: W H Freeman and Co, 1970); P Harrison, The Third Revolution: Population, Environment and A Sustainable World (London: Penguin Books, 1992); R D Kaplan ‘The Coming Anarchy: How Scarcity, Crime, Overpopulation, Tribalism, and Disease are Rapidly Destroying the Social Fabric of Our Planet’ (1994) 273 Atlantic Monthly 44.

47. Bandarage, above n 4, p 34; R Boland, S Rao, and G Zeidenstein ‘Honoring Human Rights in Population Policies: From Declaration to Action’ in G Sen, A Germain and L C Chen Population Policies Recognised: Health, Empowerment, and Rights (Boston, MA: Harvard School of Public Health, 1994), p 96.

48. The Brundtland Commission (The World Commission on Environment and Development) produced a report – Our Common Future – on international environmental law and the principles of sustainable development. The Commission sought a compromise between economic development and environmental protection by arguing for a reciprocal relationship between the two where each is essential to the other. For a discussion of sustainable development, see W Harcourt Feminist Perspectives on Sustainable Development (New Jersey and Rome: Zed Books, in association with the Society for International Development, 1994) and M Redclift Sustainable Development: Exploring the Contradictions (London: Methuen. 1987)

49. K Eder (M Ritter, trans) The Social Construction of Nature: A Sociology of Ecological Enlightenment (London: Sage. 1996); M A Hajer The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995); M Douglas and A Wildavsky Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1982); P Mcnaughten and J Urry Contested Natures (London: Sage, 1998).

50. Above n 49, p 20.

51. M Davies ‘Taking the Inside Out: Sex and Gender in the Legal Subject’ in N Naffine and R Owens Sexing the Subject of Law (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1997) p 32.

52. Douglas and Wildavsky, above n 49, p 8; Hajer, above n 49, p 17; Mcnaghten and Urry, above n 49, p 15.

53. Mcnaghten and Urry, above n 49, p 14.

54. Above n 49, p 14.

55. Above n 49, p 15, Richard Grove, however, argues that the colonial relationship with colonised land was more complex than simple imperial exploitation. He maintains that the roots of some Western environmentalism can be traced back to early efforts to protect colonial lands from environmental destruction: Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600–1860 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995) p 6.

56. Mcnaughten and Urry, above n 49, p 30.

57. Douglas and Wildavsky, above n 49, p 8.

58. Purity and Danger, An Analysis of Conceptions of Pollution and Taboo (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966); Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory (New York and London: Routledge, 1992).

59. Above n 49, 37.

60. Above n 49, p 162.

61. Hajer, above n 49, p 14; Furedi, above n 18, p 143.

62. Above n 49, p 214. See also: Union of Concerned Scientists ‘World Scientists’ Warning to Humanity’, distributed at the International Conference on Population and Development, 1994, available electronically through the Population Information Network.

63. Douglas and Wildavsky, above n 49, p 8.

64. K Strom ‘Population and Habitat in the New Millenium: A Handbook for the Environmental Activist (Boulder, CO: Population & Habitat Campaign, National Audubon Society, 1998) p 1.

65. Union of Concerned Scientists, above n 62.

66. United States Agency for International Development ‘Making a World of Difference One Family at a Time’ (1998) 3 Global Issues: Population at the Millenium, the US Perspective 32 at 32.

67. Above n 62.

68. ‘Interrelationships between Population, Sustained Economic Growth and Sustainable Development’.

69. Furedi, above n 18, p 162.

70. Strorn, above n 64, p 22.

71. Above n 62.

72. Comaroff and Comaroff, above n 22, p 109.

73. R Braidotti Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory (New York: Columbia University Press); M Thomson ‘Legislating for the Monstrous: Access to Reproductive Services and the Monstrous Feminine’ (1997) 6 Social and Legal Studies 401.

74. Thomson, above n 73, p 419.

75. McClintock, above n 9, p 48.

76. See above at nn 24–32.

77. Above n 4, p 53.

78. The public sphere is defined in para 4.3(b) as ‘production, employment, income-generating activities, education, health, science and technology, sports, culture and population related activities’.

79. G Chowdhry ‘Engendering Development? Women in Development (WID) in International Development Regimes’ in M H Marchand and J L Parpart Feminism/Postmodernism/Drvelopment (London and New York: Routledge, 1995) p 33.

80. ‘Holding Up Half the Sky, But for Whose Benefit?: A Critical Analysis of the Fourth World Conference on Women’ (1996) 6 Australian Feminist LJ 7 at 20.

81. See also C Chinkin ‘Feminist Interventions into International Law’ (1997) 19 Adelaide LR 13 at 23.

82. Otto, above n 80, p 21.

83. Mohanty, above n 6, p 5.

84. Above n 6, p 5.

85. Above n 6, p 8.

86. Above n 6, p 6.

87. Above n 16, p 161.

88. Furedi, above n 18, p 162.