Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T00:07:19.917Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Legality, by Scott Shapiro. Cambridge: MA/London: Belknap Press, 2011, viii + 455 + (index) 17 pp (£29.95 hardback). ISBN 978-0-674-05566-7.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Thomas Bustamante
Thomas Bustamante*
Affiliation:
Federal University of Minas Gerais, Brazil
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , September 2012 , pp. 499 - 507
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Legality, p 398.

2. Ibid, p 2.

3. Ibid, p 8.

4. Ibid.

5. Ibid, p 9.

6. Ibid, p 29.

7. Ibid, p 149.

8. Ibid, p 120.

9. Ibid, p 127.

10. Ibid, pp 128–129.

11. Ibid, p 129; emphasis added.

12. Ibid, pp 132–133.

13. Ibid, p 143.

14. Ibid, p 170.

15. Ibid.

16. Ibid, p 171; emphasis added.

17. Ibid, p 156.

18. Ibid, p 177.

19. Ibid, p 225.

20. Ibid, p 213.

21. Ibid, p 275.

22. Ibid, pp 302–303.

23. Ibid, p 334.

24. Ibid, p 331. The ‘economy of trust’ is understood, in Shapiro's book, as ‘the distribution of trust upon which a plan is predicated’ (p 335).

25. Dworkin, R Law's Empire (Cambridge, MA/London: Belknap Press, 1986)Google Scholar pp 4–5.

26. Ibid, p 5.

27. Legality, p 283.

28. Dworkin, above n 25, p 33.

29. Legality, p 291.

30. Tennessee Valley Authority v Hill, 437 US 153 (1978).

31. Legality, p 288.

32. Ibid, p 289.

33. Ibid, p 302.

34. Ibid, p 303.

35. Ibid, p 304.

36. Ibid, p 305.

37. Ibid, p 293.

38. Ibid, p 296.

39. Ibid.

40. Ibid, p 382.

41. Ibid, pp 307–330.

42. Ibid, p 357.

43. Ibid.

44. Ibid, p 370.

45. Ibid, p 172.

46. Waldron, J ‘Review essay: planning for legality’ (2011) 109 Michigan Law Review 883 Google Scholar at 894.

47. Waldron, J ‘Normative (or ethical) positivism’ in Coleman, J (ed.) Hart's Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to ‘The Concept of Law’ (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001)Google Scholar p 421.

48. Ibid, p 418.

49. Legality, p 297.

50. Ibid.

51. Dworkin, R ‘A reply’ in Cohen, M (ed.) Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence (London: Duckworth, 1984)Google Scholar p 254.

52. Ibid, p 256.

53. Hart, Hla The Concept of Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd edn, 1994)Google Scholar p 240.

54. Dworkin, R Justice in Robes (Cambridge, MA/: Belknap Press, 2006)Google Scholar p 141.

55. Kelsen, H General Theory of Law and State (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1946)Google Scholar p xiii (emphasis added).

56. Factortame v Secretary of State for Transport[1991] AC 603.

57. MacCormick, N Questioning Sovereignty: Law, State and Nation in the European Commonwealth (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar p 81.

58. Ibid, p 92.

59. Ibid.

60. Dworkin, above n 25; Alexy, R, A Theory of Legal Argumentation: The Theory of Rational Discourse as Theory of Legal Justification, trans R Adler and N MacCormick (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989)Google Scholar; MacCormick, N Rhetoric and the Rule of Law: A Theory of Legal Reasoning (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bustamante, T ‘Comment on Petroski: on MacCormick's Post-Positivism’ (2011) 12 German Law J 693 Google Scholar.

61. Bertea, S ‘Law and legal reasoning’ (2008) 58 Northern Ireland Legal Q 5 Google Scholar at 10.

62. Ibid, at 12.