Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T15:28:41.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Freedom of Commercial Expression by Roger A Shiner, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, xxiv + 332 + (bibliography + index) 23 pp (£45.00 hardback). ISBN 0 19 82626 1 2.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Thomas Gibbons
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , July 2005 , pp. 340 - 343
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Valentine v Chrestensen 316 US 52 (1942).

2. 376 US 254 (1964).

3. Virginia State Board of Pharmacy et a1 v Virginia Citizens Consumer Council Inc et a1 425 US 748 ( 1976).

4. Subsequently, the court limited the extent of the protection by holding that, compared with political and cultural expression, restrictions on Commercial speech attract a less strict level of scrutiny: Central Hudson Gus & Electric Cotpn v Public Service Commission of New York 447 US 557 (1980); and 44 Liquormnrt Inc v Rhode Island 517 US 484 (1996).

5. A controversial Canadian example is RJR-MacDonald Inc v Canada (Attorney- General) (1995) 127 DLR (4th) 1. In the European Court of Human Rights, examples are Markt Intern Verlag & Klaus Beermann v Germany ( 1990) 12 EHRR 16 1 ; Jacubowski v Germany (1994) 19 EHRR 64; Hertel v Switzerland (1998) 28 EHRR 534.

6. C Munro ‘The Value of Commercial Speech’ (2003) 62 CLJ 134.

7. Shiner cites C E Baker ‘Media Concentration: Giving Up on Democracy’ (2002) 54 Fla L Rev 854.

8. Here, Shiner is adopting Meir Dan-Cohen’s taxonomy of the grounds for rights: M Dan-Cohen Rights, Persons and Organizations: A Legal Theory for Bureaucratic Society (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).

9. For example, M Redish Money Talks: Speech, Economic Power and the Values of Democracy (New York: New York University Press, 2001).