Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-rnpqb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-26T17:36:42.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Common Values and the Public-Private Divide by Dawn Oliver. London: Butterworths, Law in Context, 1999, xxix + 287 + bibliography and index ISBN 0 406 98303 8

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Ian Leigh
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Legal Studies , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , March 2001 , pp. 140 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Society of Legal Scholars 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. R v Panel on Takeover and Mergers, ex p Datafin plc (1987) QB 815.

2. Sir Harry Woolf ‘Public law — private law: Why the divide’ (1986) PL 220.

3. Rt Hon Lord Justice Sedley Freedom, Law and Justice (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1999) ‘Public power and private power’.

4. Birkinshaw, P, Harden, I and Lewis, N Government By Moonlight (London, 1990)Google Scholar.

5. Dunn, A (ed) The Voluntary Sector, The State and the Law (Oxford: Hart, 2000)Google Scholar; Leigh, I Law, Politics and Local Democracy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), ch 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6. Eg Okin, S M Justice, Gender and the Family (New York: Basic Books, 1989)Google Scholar; Olsen, F E ‘The Family and the Market: A Study in Ideology and Family Reform’ (1982-83) 96 Harv LR 1497 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Naffine, N Law and the Sexes (London: Allen and Unwin, 1990) ch 3Google Scholar.

7. For surveys see: Freeman, M D A (ed) Family, State and the Law (Aldershot: Dartmouth, 1999)Google Scholar Introduction; Eekelaar, J ‘What is “Critical” Family Law?’ (1989) 105 LQR 244 Google Scholar.

8. A paragraph refersbriefly to it, however, in a chapter on Europe (at p 235).

9. Hart, H L A Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1982) ch 7Google Scholar.

10. Simmonds, N E The Decline of Juntdica1 Reason (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984) esp ch 2Google Scholar.